I don’t remember if I voted because I have been voting on a lot of stuff lately.
If I didn’t here is my +1 for all 3.
Jeff
> On Sep 12, 2023, at 2:29 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Thanks Jeff & Gary.
>
> Is that for all the MINA versions?
>
> On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
I only tested 2.2.3 RC 1 on Windows with Java 17. My other test runs where
on macOS with Java 8.
Gary
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 4:29 AM Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Thanks Jeff & Gary.
>
> Is that for all the MINA versions?
>
> On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> > I can confirm a failure
Never mind, got the same error.
In Java 17 a call to CharsetEncoder.encode() on an immutable buffer
throws a CoderMalfunctionError, not a ReadOnlyBufferException.
The test has to be changed to reflect that. It does not change a thing
for the release, it's still good to go.
Thanks!
On
Thanks Jeff & Gary.
Is that for all the MINA versions?
On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
I can confirm a failure on Java 17 and Windows:
[INFO] ---
[INFO] T E S T S
[INFO] ---
I can confirm a failure on Java 17 and Windows:
[INFO] ---
[INFO] T E S T S
[INFO] ---
[INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
[INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0,
+1.
2 remarks:
- Does not build with Java 17
- Build is failing on Windows
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 8:11 AM Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> +1
>
> Le jeu. 7 sept. 2023 à 05:30, Emmanuel Lecharny a
> écrit :
>
> > hi!
> >
> > WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
> >
> >
> > This is a vote for a
+1
Le jeu. 7 sept. 2023 à 05:30, Emmanuel Lecharny a
écrit :
> hi!
>
> WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
>
>
> This is a vote for a triple release:
> * MINA 2.2.3
> * MINA 2.1.8
> * MINA 2.0.25
>
> Those versions are fixing a Datagram session bug:
> DIRMINA-996:IoSessionRecycler RemoteAddress
+1
Jeff
> On Sep 6, 2023, at 9:29 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
> hi!
>
> WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
>
>
> This is a vote for a triple release:
> * MINA 2.2.3
> * MINA 2.1.8
> * MINA 2.0.25
>
> Those versions are fixing a Datagram session bug:
> DIRMINA-996:IoSessionRecycler
Non-binding +1 for all three. Tested each src zip file with 'mvn clear
verify' using:
Apache Maven 3.9.4 (dfbb324ad4a7c8fb0bf182e6d91b0ae20e3d2dd9)
Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.9.4/libexec
Java version: 1.8.0_382, vendor: Homebrew, runtime:
* MINA 2.2.3 +1
* MINA 2.1.8 +1
* MINA 2.0.25 +1
Thanks
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Lecharny
Sent: 07 September 2023 05:30
To: dev@mina.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases
hi!
WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
This is a vote for a
Thanks Emmanuel!
Gary
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023, 16:49 Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> ... and Apache MINA Team page updated!
>
> On 04/07/2023 22:33, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> > Gary has commit rights :-)
> >
> > That makes me realize that I need to update the Team page.
> >
> > And, yes, I do think we
... and Apache MINA Team page updated!
On 04/07/2023 22:33, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Gary has commit rights :-)
That makes me realize that I need to update the Team page.
And, yes, I do think we should thows some meaningful excection.
On 04/07/2023 14:35, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
Make a PR
Gary has commit rights :-)
That makes me realize that I need to update the Team page.
And, yes, I do think we should thows some meaningful excection.
On 04/07/2023 14:35, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
Make a PR
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 7:12 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi All,
I noticed that in
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 8:35 AM Jonathan Valliere wrote:
>
> Make a PR
An order is not a thought.
Gary
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 7:12 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I noticed that in org.apache.ftpserver.util.EncryptUtils we explicitly
>> throw RuntimeException. This is usually an
Make a PR
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 7:12 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I noticed that in org.apache.ftpserver.util.EncryptUtils we explicitly
> throw RuntimeException. This is usually an anti-pattern as
> IllegalArgumentException, IllegalStateException, and others are more
> descriptive.
>
Hi Emmanuel,
This all sounds good to me!
Thank you for the update.
Gary
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023, 18:39 Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> I'm currently working on FTP Server for a week now. My goals are to get
> MINA 2.2.2 replace the previous version, and to get a grip on teh FTP
> serve
That's on me. I have added two encryption methods (SHA256 and SHA512)
because FTPServer was only supporting MD5 and SHA-1.
But the EncryptUtils has not yet been committed afaict. I'll check that.
On 03/07/2023 23:44, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi All:
Did I check out the wrong branch or have bad
Hi Gary,
I'm currently working on FTP Server for a week now. My goals are to get
MINA 2.2.2 replace the previous version, and to get a grip on teh FTP
serve code base.
The first step is pretty much on its way, with a few road blocks:
- there were some API changes that needed to be addressed
On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 6:32 PM Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> we just have created a Mastodon account to inform the world abouut the
> Apache MINA project evolution.
>
> Feel free to follow @apachem...@fosstodon.org !
> --
> *Emmanuel Lécharny*
>
>
[X] +1 | Release MINA 2.2.2
[X] +1 | Release MINA 2.1.7
[X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.24
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenade des Anglais – 06200 NICE
T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50
P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
emmanuel.lecha...@busit.com https://www.busit.com/
Non-binding +1 on 2.2.2.
SHA512, ASC OK, and 'mvn clean verify' builds OK on:
pache Maven 3.9.2 (c9616018c7a021c1c39be70fb2843d6f5f9b8a1c)
Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.9.2/libexec
Java version: 1.8.0_372, vendor: Homebrew, runtime:
Hi,
In the future, it would be convenient if the VOTE email contained a URL to
the project's PGP/GPG KEYS file.
Gary
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 6:58 PM Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> hi!
>
> WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
>
>
> This is a vote for a triple release:
> * MINA 2.2.2
> * MINA 2.1.7
>
Indeed.
The reason we have both SHA-256 and 512 is historic. We can stop signing
with SHA-256. I'll update the release process to reflect that.
Thanks!
On 04/06/2023 03:53, Gary Gregory wrote:
In the future, it seems to me like we only need sha512 files, not both
512 and 256. Less clutter
In the future, it seems to me like we only need sha512 files, not both 512
and 256. Less clutter IMO.
Gary
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023, 18:58 Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> hi!
>
> WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
>
>
> This is a vote for a triple release:
> * MINA 2.2.2
> * MINA 2.1.7
> * MINA 2.0.24
+3
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 6:58 PM Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> hi!
>
> WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
>
>
> This is a vote for a triple release:
> * MINA 2.2.2
> * MINA 2.1.7
> * MINA 2.0.24
>
> Those versions are fixing some SSL/TLS issues and bring some added
> features:
> DIRMINA-1122:
Let us vote :
[ X] +1 | Release MINA 2.2.2
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.2.2
[ X] +1 | Release MINA 2.1.7
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.1.7
[ X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.24
[ ] ± | Abstain
[ ] -1 | Do *NOT* release MINA 2.0.24
-Original Message-
From:
Errr…. +1 to all 3. :-)
Jeff
> On Jun 1, 2023, at 8:21 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Jeff
>
>> On Jun 1, 2023, at 4:58 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>>
>> hi!
>>
>> WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
>>
>>
>> This is a vote for a triple release:
>> * MINA 2.2.2
>> * MINA 2.1.7
>>
+1
Jeff
> On Jun 1, 2023, at 4:58 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> hi!
>
> WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
>
>
> This is a vote for a triple release:
> * MINA 2.2.2
> * MINA 2.1.7
> * MINA 2.0.24
>
> Those versions are fixing some SSL/TLS issues and bring some added features:
>
tomaswolf merged PR #382:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/382
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
tomaswolf opened a new pull request, #382:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/382
The previous implementation always put unused SftpClients back into the
pool, but SftpClients in the pool were never closed (unless the whole SSH
session was closed).
Let this pool work more
+1
Le mer. 10 mai 2023, 09:35, Guillaume Nodet a écrit :
> I've staged a candidate release for 2.10.0 at:
> Official staging repo:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.10.0/
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1081
> Git
It's on public keyservers:
https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?search=073F7A9345756F3B40CDB99E6C70A3B7599C5736=on=index
I've updated the KEYS file at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/mina/KEYS
with the updated key.
Thx !
Le mer. 10 mai 2023 à 21:10, Thomas Wolf a écrit :
>
On 10.05.23 09:35 , Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've staged a candidate release for 2.10.0 at:
[...]
Please review and vote !
+1
* JGit SSH tests pass
* CI builds in Github are all green
* Class versions are 52 (Java 8)
* Src tar unpacks and builds fine; all tests pass locally (OS X)
Thanks,
+1
Jeff
> On May 10, 2023, at 1:35 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> I've staged a candidate release for 2.10.0 at:
> Official staging repo:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.10.0/
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1081
>
Think of it like this. All of the Processor Pool threads share the same
FilterChain. So if you have 8 cores there are 16 Processor Threads. If you
add a ExecutorFilter with 4 threads then then all the tasks produced by
those 16 threads will then be executed on the 4 shared threads and it will
Yes, all sockets
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 11:21 AM KMVS (Jira) wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17720884#comment-17720884
> ]
>
> KMVS edited comment on DIRMINA-1173 at 5/9/23 3:20 PM:
>
Yes, we maintain at least two branches as LTS. However new features will
likely only be added to the newest branch.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 9:36 PM Radar wen (Jira) wrote:
> Radar wen created DIRMINA-1170:
> --
>
> Summary: Will Apache MINA 2.1 and
Hi Christofer,
nice work on plc4x!
We will look at it and see how to apply to to the MINA project.
Many thanks!
On 15/02/2023 15:58, Christofer Dutz wrote:
Hi,
while reviewing your projects activity as part of my board duties, I came to
notice, that the dev-list is in an almost unusable
Hi,
please see here:
https://mina.apache.org/mina-project/2.2-vs-2.1.html
Cheers
Chris
On 01.12.22 16:28, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
Hi All,
I want to migrate the FTP server component from Mina Core 2.1.6 to 2.2.1 but
there is API breakage. Can someone do the port or provide directions? TY!
Hi,
first, can you tell which MINA version you are using? Also what is your
environment (OS, Java version, machine configuration - number of cores,
type of CPU, frequency, ram-)
Is there any valid reason to create two thread pool of 1000 threads?
That sounds overkilling to me. Also are you
On 23.09.22 17:16 , Radhakrishnan Meiappan wrote:
* If I pass the .ppk file I'm getting the below exception - getting
exception during parsing of the key file
Check what the file format of that PPK file is. If it mentions anything
about "argon": you need at least Apache MINA sshd 2.9.0
On 08.09.22 13:11 , Jonathan Valliere wrote:
I don’t know how to connect my personal account to my Apache permissions
for Apache repos.
IIRC all I had to do was enter my GitHub account name in the Apache
account info at https://id.apache.org/ . It may take a few hours to take
effect.
See
I don’t know how to connect my personal account to my Apache permissions
for Apache repos.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 3:25 AM Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> what is the pb you are having with GH ? Can't connect? Can't access to
> the mina-sshd repo?
>
> On 2022/09/07 12:32, Jonathan
Hi Jonathan,
what is the pb you are having with GH ? Can't connect? Can't access to
the mina-sshd repo?
On 2022/09/07 12:32, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
Emmanuel do you have a link somewhere how to fix my connection to Apache on
GitHub?
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 4:29 AM Edward Zheng
wrote:
Hi
Thanks, Jonathan.
On 27.08.22 20:05, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
https://github.com/apache/mina/blob/7893dfc29bb37dcef1345ffb482709902b6b6c9f/mina-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mina/transport/socket/nio/NioSocketSession.java#L94
On Aug 26, 2022 at 5:15:42 AM, Christoph John wrote:
The
Emmanuel do you have a link somewhere how to fix my connection to Apache on
GitHub?
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 4:29 AM Edward Zheng
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I create a pull request several days ago.
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/242. I’m not sure if it’s a
> bugfix or my usage is wrong,
Hi Guillaume,
sorry, I should have tested it again, it now passes green (I was in
vacation last week...). I guess it was a hicup...
My +1 for teh release.
On 2022/09/05 09:43, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've run the test alone without any issue on osx, windows 10 and fedora, so
I'm quite
I've run the test alone without any issue on osx, windows 10 and fedora, so
I'm quite confident the underlying code is working correctly.
Le mar. 30 août 2022 à 06:41, Emmanuel Lécharny a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> got one error on sshd-core:
>
> [INFO] Running
+1
Hi,
got one error on sshd-core:
[INFO] Running org.apache.sshd.common.auth.PublicKeyAuthenticationTest
[ERROR] Tests run: 7, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
0.847 s <<< FAILURE! - in
org.apache.sshd.common.auth.PublicKeyAuthenticationTest
[ERROR]
+1
Le lun. 22 août 2022 à 14:46, Guillaume Nodet a écrit :
> I've staged a candidate release for 2.9.1 at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1079
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/tree/sshd-2.9.1
> Issues solved:
>
>
https://github.com/apache/mina/blob/7893dfc29bb37dcef1345ffb482709902b6b6c9f/mina-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mina/transport/socket/nio/NioSocketSession.java#L94
On Aug 26, 2022 at 5:15:42 AM, Christoph John
wrote:
> The constant PEER_ADDRESS is no longer present in the code in 2.2.x
>
> I
The constant PEER_ADDRESS is no longer present in the code in 2.2.x
I can see however that in
https://github.com/apache/mina/blob/7893dfc29bb37dcef1345ffb482709902b6b6c9f/mina-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mina/filter/ssl/SslFilter.java#L272
and
It should be either doing it automatically or is a configurable option in
the filter.
I’m far away from my computer right now so I can’t check.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 6:44 AM Christoph John
wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> are you able to help me with the last item on the list (see quote below)?
>
>
Hi Jonathan,
are you able to help me with the last item on the list (see quote below)?
Thank you in advance and best regards,
Chris.
On 28.07.22 16:42, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
3. to use SNI we formerly set the "PEER_ADDRESS". Is this still possible? Please see here:
+1
Jeff
> On Aug 22, 2022, at 6:46 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> I've staged a candidate release for 2.9.1 at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1079
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/tree/sshd-2.9.1
> Issues solved:
>
On 11.08.22 15:08 , Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'm mostly offline these days, but i'll try to push a release candidate for
a vote this week or next.
Thanks, Guillaume! Make it next week; another issue has come up that
needs a hotfix. (SSHD-1289)
Cheers,
Thomas
Directory.
bascially, rebuilding Apache LDAP API with Java 8 did the trick.
The pb was due to an exception caused by an API change in Java 9,
related to ByteBuffer (see
https://www.morling.dev/blog/bytebuffer-and-the-dreaded-nosuchmethoderror/)
which was causing an exception to be thrown,
I'm mostly offline these days, but i'll try to push a release candidate for
a vote this week or next.
Le mer. 3 août 2022 à 22:03, Thomas Wolf a écrit :
> On 02.08.22 23:47 , Thomas Wolf wrote:
> > The 2.9.0 release appears to have been built incorrectly.
>
> To clarify: of course I meant "The
Was the fix in Mina or Directory?
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 5:34 AM Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> I confirm. I built the LDAP API with Java 11 targetting Java 8, but it's
> not enough.
>
> Fixed in trunk.
>
> On 30/07/2022 10:23, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> > Seems like it's an issue with a mixed
I confirm. I built the LDAP API with Java 11 targetting Java 8, but it's
not enough.
Fixed in trunk.
On 30/07/2022 10:23, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Seems like it's an issue with a mixed Java version being used: the lib
built with Java 11 and running tests in Java 8, or something like that.
On 02.08.22 23:47 , Thomas Wolf wrote:
The 2.9.0 release appears to have been built incorrectly.
To clarify: of course I meant "The Apache MINA SSHD 2.9.0 release..."
Guillaume, could you please prepare a 2.9.1 bug fix release?
of Apache MINA SSHD?
Cheers,
Thomas
Seems like it's an issue with a mixed Java version being used: the lib
built with Java 11 and running tests in Java 8, or something like that.
Still investigating.
On 30/07/2022 10:03, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently investiagting some infinite loop in Apache DS when setting
up
I think it’s related to how the kqueue works in combination with the socket
shutdown cycle in SocketChannel.
It’s likely that our close event is triggering too early.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:31 AM Christoph John
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have a test suite for QuickFIX/J which runs (at least) every
Hi Christoph,
answers inline
On 28/07/2022 14:48, Christoph John wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
I took a look at this and it seems the two latches were a red
herring. One is for the initiator (connector) and the other one for
the acceptor that are used in the unit test.
I must admit I haven't
Hi Emmanuel,
I took a look at this and it seems the two latches were a red herring. One is for the initiator
(connector) and the other one for the acceptor that are used in the unit test.
I must admit I haven't spent enough time to unerstand what was going on ;-)
No problem, thank you
Hi!
I'm closing this vote with 4 binding +1 and one ,on binding +1:
Binding
- Jonathan
- Jeff Genender
- Guillaume
- and me
Non Binding:
- Chistoph.
Thanks for the votes, I'll push the packages and announce the release ASAP !
On 20/07/2022 15:41, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
hi!
This is a
On 21/07/2022 15:38, Christoph John wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
I took a look at this and it seems the two latches were a red herring.
One is for the initiator (connector) and the other one for the acceptor
that are used in the unit test.
I must admit I haven't spent enough time to unerstand
+1
Le lun. 18 juil. 2022 à 09:51, Guillaume Nodet a écrit :
>
> I've staged another candidate release at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1076
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/tree/sshd-2.9.0
> Issues solved:
>
Hi Emmanuel,
I took a look at this and it seems the two latches were a red herring. One is for the initiator
(connector) and the other one for the acceptor that are used in the unit test.
However, I think I found the root cause for the failing unit tests. We have an AbstractIoHandler
which
+1
On 20.07.22 16:33, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
+1
Le mer. 20 juil. 2022 à 15:42, Emmanuel Lécharny a
écrit :
hi!
This is a vote for MINA 2.2.1.
This version just fixes an issue in the export declaration for OSGi: a
missing comma made MINA 2.2.0 impossible to use by application that
+1
Le mer. 20 juil. 2022 à 15:42, Emmanuel Lécharny a
écrit :
> hi!
>
>
> This is a vote for MINA 2.2.1.
>
> This version just fixes an issue in the export declaration for OSGi: a
> missing comma made MINA 2.2.0 impossible to use by application that
> leverage OSGi, due to a concatenation of
+1
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 9:46 AM Jeff Genender wrote:
> +1
>
> Jeff
>
> > On Jul 20, 2022, at 7:41 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
> wrote:
> >
> > hi!
> >
> >
> > This is a vote for MINA 2.2.1.
> >
> > This version just fixes an issue in the export declaration for OSGi: a
> missing comma made MINA
+1
Jeff
> On Jul 20, 2022, at 7:41 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> hi!
>
>
> This is a vote for MINA 2.2.1.
>
> This version just fixes an issue in the export declaration for OSGi: a
> missing comma made MINA 2.2.0 impossible to use by application that leverage
> OSGi, due to a
On 18.07.22 09:51 , Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've staged another candidate release at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1076
Git tag:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/tree/sshd-2.9.0
Issues solved:
+1
- checked the packages signatures (GPG and SHA)
- built from source, tests all green (java 11)
Thanks Guillaume !
PS: I'll update the site doco to point to the proper KEYS file
On 19/07/2022 16:31, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
It's a subkey of the my last key which I've uploaded to
It's a subkey of the my last key which I've uploaded to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/mina/KEYS.
It's available at
http://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?search=4A61C968D0023541DAE9B1A0BC7DF305D87BDFA7=on=index
but the key fingerprint does not appear in the KEYS file (I think that's
Hi Guillaume,
qstill have an issue with the KEYS file. Where did you pushed it ?
(I have successfully checked the signature with the SHA256 sig you
pushed, thanks !)
On 19/07/2022 11:51, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded the releases and SHA 256 / 512 signatures to
I've uploaded the releases and SHA 256 / 512 signatures to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/ and added my new key to
the mina KEYS file.
Thx !
Le mar. 19 juil. 2022 à 06:49, Emmanuel Lécharny a
écrit :
> Just mentionning it because we *MUST* provide SHA256 and SHA 512
>
Just mentionning it because we *MUST* provide SHA256 and SHA 512
signatures, and the standard maven release only generates MD5 and SHA1
signatures.
On 19/07/2022 06:47, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Also the packages are missing from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/
On
Also the packages are missing from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/
On 18/07/2022 09:51, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've staged another candidate release at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1076
Git tag:
+1
Jeff
> On Jul 18, 2022, at 1:51 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> I've staged another candidate release at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1076
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/tree/sshd-2.9.0
> Issues solved:
>
+1
Le lun. 4 juil. 2022 à 23:43, Emmanuel Lécharny a
écrit :
> Hi!
>
>
> it has been a couple of months now that I cut a version of MINA 2.2.0,
> but haven't started a vote, because I wanted to test that exception were
> properly handled when generated from the SslFilter. It took may way
>
time:/
Just to be sure. (not such a big deal, I can re-push the packages).
On 17/07/2022 00:42, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Yes, I'll do that on monday.
Le sam. 16 juil. 2022 à 10:38, Thomas Wolf a écrit :
On 13.07.22 08:44 , Thomas Wolf wrote:
On 13.07.22 00:20 , Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
I get
Yes, I'll do that on monday.
Le sam. 16 juil. 2022 à 10:38, Thomas Wolf a écrit :
> On 13.07.22 08:44 , Thomas Wolf wrote:
> > On 13.07.22 00:20 , Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> >> I get some error while running tests:
> >> org.testcontainers.containers.ContainerLaunchException: Container
> >>
mine is binding so we should be over the threshold now
On Jul 16, 2022 at 11:54:40 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> I dont remember if I voted or not…but if not… here it is…
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On Jul 16, 2022, at 8:49 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 16/07/2022 11:31, Christoph John wrote:
I dont remember if I voted or not…but if not… here it is…
Jeff
> On Jul 16, 2022, at 8:49 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
>
>
> On 16/07/2022 11:31, Christoph John wrote:
>> +1
>
> Thanks!
>
>> But don't know if my vote counts.
>
> Every vote *do* count, even if not all the votes are
On 16/07/2022 11:31, Christoph John wrote:
+1
Thanks!
But don't know if my vote counts.
Every vote *do* count, even if not all the votes are binding. The idea
is that if someone casts a -1, that means there is something that
requires some investigation.
Typically, when I started the
+1
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email message and any
attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain
confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected
from disclosure.
On Jul 16, 2022 at 4:31:51 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Hi,
>
+1
But don't know if my vote counts.
Thanks for your investigation. I will take a closer look next week.
Cheers
Chris
Jul 16, 2022 10:32:02 Emmanuel Lécharny :
> Hi,
>
> I need one more vote at least to get the release out.
>
> I'm confident the pb Christoph had was due to some bad test, not
On 13.07.22 08:44 , Thomas Wolf wrote:
On 13.07.22 00:20 , Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
I get some error while running tests:
org.testcontainers.containers.ContainerLaunchException: Container
startup failed
The problem is that the
entrypoint.sh files in the test resources don't have the
Hi,
I need one more vote at least to get the release out.
I'm confident the pb Christoph had was due to some bad test, not to a
MINA issue.
Thanks !
On 05/07/2022 09:38, Christoph John wrote:
Hi Emmanuel
Did you manage to fix the bug which we talked about in the mail thread from May
Hi Christoph,
after further analysis, it appears that we have 2 countdown latch
instances (exceptionThrownLatch) at play:
* one that is decremented in the exceptionCaught event,
[Count1]>:1]--->PKIX path validation failed:
java.security.cert.CertPathValidatorException:
Hi Christoph,
actually, there is a kind of race condition in your test.
I have added some logs:
@Override
public void exceptionCaught(NextFilter nextFilter,
IoSession session, Throwable cause)
throws Exception {
On 13/07/2022 09:37, Christoph John wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
thanks for your analysis. The filter that should catch the exception is added
as last part in the chain. Could it be that the chain is not fully iterated
somehow? Just guessing, I don't have enough MINA experience to make an educated
Hi Emmanuel,
thanks for your analysis. The filter that should catch the exception is added
as last part in the chain. Could it be that the chain is not fully iterated
somehow? Just guessing, I don't have enough MINA experience to make an educated
guess. :)
Cheers
Chris
Jul 13, 2022 06:38:00
On 13.07.22 00:20 , Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi Guillaume,
I get some error while running tests:
[ERROR] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 6, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
33.642 s <<< FAILURE! - in
org.apache.sshd.client.auth.pubkey.HostBoundPubKeyAuthTest
[ERROR]
Here are some of my current findings.
For the (failing) test shouldFailWhenUsingBadClientCertificate, here are
the traces we get:
juil. 13, 2022 6:28:42 AM org.apache.mina.filter.ssl.SSLHandlerG0
execute_task
GRAVE: SSLHandlerG0@ae273e3[mode=server, connected=false] task() -
storing error
Never mind, I'm set up now, and in debug mode. All is good !
On 13/07/2022 00:47, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi Christoph,
I'm trying to ran the failing tests on my machine (eclipse with Java 8
and Java 11), and I'll probably need some assistance.
I'm using the chrjohn-mina-2.2.0 branch. It
Hi Christoph,
I'm trying to ran the failing tests on my machine (eclipse with Java 8
and Java 11), and I'll probably need some assistance.
I'm using the chrjohn-mina-2.2.0 branch. It seems that the generated
code is not stored at the proper place.
Any clue?
On 09/07/2022 11:49,
601 - 700 of 11539 matches
Mail list logo
