+1
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Maarten Bosteels
mbosteels@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Maarten
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
[X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0
my vote, btw.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
+1 :) (with fingers crossed)
Big Thanks to Emmanuel :)
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After Alain found that there were some missing ASL headers in the last
released version, the latest vote has been reverted, and I just released
MINA
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
Let's vote again :
[X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0
--
Alex Karasulu
My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/
Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org
To set up a
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
[X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0
/niklas
+1
Le Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:55:44 +0200,
Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi,
After Alain found that there were some missing ASL headers in the
last released version, the latest vote has been reverted, and I just
released MINA again (after having checked that we don't have
[X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0
my vote, btw.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
+1
Maarten
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
[X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0
my vote, btw.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
+1
Jeff
On Sep 21, 2010, at 4:55 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi,
After Alain found that there were some missing ASL headers in the last
released version, the latest vote has been reverted, and I just released MINA
again (after having checked that we don't have any missing ASL.20
+1 (yay!)
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 21, 2010, at 3:55 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi,
After Alan found that there were some missing ASL headers in the last
released version, the latest vote has been reverted, and I just released MINA
again (after having checked that we don't have any
+1
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:55, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After Alain found that there were some missing ASL headers in the last
released version, the latest vote has been reverted, and I just released
MINA again (after having checked that we don't have any missing
I did a quick smoke-test : created a maven quickstart with a simple client +
server using the maven repo url
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-040/url
Seems fine. Thanks Emmanuel !
+1
One question though : the distribution on [1] contains sources but no
binaries ?
Good
job Emmanuel, thanks for struggling with this release and all that it
entailed.
+1 for fighting all mavens, Emmanuel! Thanks a lot!
Without Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot (my fellow Directory developer), the
release wouldn't be on the table...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
Rat complains:
Too many unapproved licenses: 613
Should we be concerned?
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 17, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi,
The last version of MINA (2.0.0) has been released !
Here are the complete release notes from JIRA:
Bug
* [DIRMINA-539
On 9/20/10 8:18 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Rat complains:
Too many unapproved licenses: 613
Should we be concerned?
Rat must be drunk like a rat. We only have 561 java files, plus a few
.xml files.
Do you have a log ?
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 9/20/10 8:18 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Rat complains:
Too many unapproved licenses: 613
Should we be concerned?
Rat must be drunk like a rat. We only have 561 java files, plus a few .xml
files.
Do you have a log ?
All I
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:05 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/20/10 9:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
All I did was
mvn rat:check -fn
To get the full report, one should do mvn site and get the report from
On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 9/20/10 9:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
All I did was
mvn rat:check -fn
To get the full report, one should do mvn site and get the report from
target/site/rat-report.html,
I don't have the ability to validate the release so I'll just +0 here. Good
job Emmanuel, thanks for struggling with this release and all that it
entailed.
Regards,
2010/9/19 Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com
+1
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 20:18, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 19.09.10 15:26, Alex Karasulu wrote:
I don't have the ability to validate the release so I'll just +0 here.
+0 for the release from me, too.
Good
job Emmanuel, thanks for struggling with this release and all that it
entailed.
+1 for fighting all mavens, Emmanuel! Thanks a lot!
Bernd
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
[X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0
Looks perfect. Thanks for all you hard work on getting the release to
this state, Emmanuel.
/niklas
[ X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0
Thanks Emm !
--
thanks
ashish
Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
[X ] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0
Jeff
On Sep 17, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi,
The last version of MINA (2.0.0) has been released !
Here are the complete release notes from JIRA:
Bug
* [DIRMINA-539 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-539]
-
Looks fine for me.
thanks Emm for being stronger than maven ;)
+1
Julien
Le Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:18:49 +0200,
Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi,
The last version of MINA (2.0.0) has been released !
Here are the complete release notes from JIRA:
Bug
*
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@apache.org wrote:
On 9/13/10 11:43 PM, Maarten Bosteels wrote:
Then 30 minutes later, it passes. I have no idea why it behaves this
way, but this is systematic, and not only for MINA, but also for Vysper,
FtpServer and so on.
This
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
The default mvn install does not build w/out the artifacts created from the
serial profile. Is that by design?
I had the same problem, but forgot to add a JIRA issue for it. Now fixed:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@apache.orgwrote:
On 9/13/10 10:54 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
[X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0
I got some minor issues with the distribution packages,
On 9/14/10 9:16 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@apache.org wrote:
On 9/13/10 11:43 PM, Maarten Bosteels wrote:
Then 30 minutes later, it passes. I have no idea why it behaves this
way, but this is systematic, and not only for MINA,
On 9/14/10 3:54 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here's the Jira link for this version if you'd like to review issues in more
details:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10670styleName=Htmlversion=12313701
A temporary tag has been created (it can be removed if the
On 9/14/10 9:22 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Alan D. Cabreral...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
The default mvn install does not build w/out the artifacts created from the
serial profile. Is that by design?
I had the same problem, but forgot to add a JIRA issue for
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we just have to remove the activation part for this distribution
module to get the build working as it was.
+1, this probably also requires adding the mina-transport-serial
module to the list of modules in
I have the same trouble building here.
Julien
Le Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:29:51 +0200,
Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 9/14/10 3:54 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here's the Jira link for this version if you'd like to review
issues in more details:
On 9/14/10 11:08 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we just have to remove theactivation part for this distribution
module to get the build working as it was.
+1, this probably also requires adding the
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
elecha...@apache.org wrote:
The serial profile has been added as we don't want users to get a bin
including the rxtx parts, as it's LGPL. Right now, I'm questionning this
choice, at least for the Java part of it, as soon as we don't deliver
On 9/14/10 1:20 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
elecha...@apache.org wrote:
The serial profile has been added as we don't want users to get a bin
including the rxtx parts, as it's LGPL. Right now, I'm questionning this
choice, at least for the
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@apache.org wrote:
Shouldn't we consider the download of the rxtx.jar as an active choice
already ? (just wondering)
But, with how I proposed earlier (which I now think is wrong) rxtx.jar
would be downloaded by running mvn -Pdistribute
On 9/14/10 1:49 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at
1:35 PM, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@apache.org wrote: Shouldn't we
consider the download of the rxtx.jar as an active choice already ?
(just wondering) But, with how I proposed earlier (which I now think
is wrong)
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
So to be clear : - the bin won't contain anything related to
serial (no rxtx jar, no serial code) - the src package will contain the code
of the serial project I'm fine with that if nobody object.
Yes, that was what
Fowrwarded to the correct ML. The initial mail was wrongly posted to
the directory ML.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
[X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0
I got some minor issues with the distribution packages, but nothing
stopping this release. Otherwise, I think it's looking good.
/niklas
On 9/13/10 10:54 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote:
[X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0
I got some minor issues with the distribution packages, but nothing
stopping this release. Otherwise, I think it's looking good.
yes, we
I think we should also try to make the tests stable. Hudson builds on
windows seem to be failing more than they pass.
It took us a very long time to reach 2.0.0. That's why I wonder if we
shouldn't spend just a little more time to get these things right ?
Hmm, on the other hand, we could start
On 9/13/10 11:43 PM, Maarten Bosteels wrote:
I think we should also try to make the tests stable. Hudson builds on
windows seem to be failing more than they pass.
It took us a very long time to reach 2.0.0. That's why I wonder if we
shouldn't spend just a little more time to get these things
Here's the Jira link for this version if you'd like to review issues in more
details:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10670styleName=Htmlversion=12313701
A temporary tag has been created (it can be removed if the vote is not
approved):
43 matches
Mail list logo
