Thanks Macro for raising up the concern of license and Sheng for the
clarification, the current release process is only targeting source release.
Regards,
-Ciyong
-Original Message-
From: Marco de Abreu
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 4:51 AM
To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Hi Ziyi, Xingjian,
Thanks for reporting the issues from GluonCV/AutoGluon perspective.
I just did a quick try by reverting the
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18358, then the behavior is same
as 1.6.0 with the cases in the gist
(https://gist.github.com/sxjscience/944066c82e566f1b
Hi,
I'd like to request access to the Slack of MXNet.
Thanks,
Leandro Campos
+1
Tested:
- Make flow building from source: example/extensions all work correctly
- staticbuild flow cpu & cu102 variants with custom extension library
Sam
On 7/12/20, 1:52 PM, "Marco de Abreu" wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
click links or
Okay, thanks for the clarification!
-Marco
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020, 5:58 PM Sheng Zha wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> Since the license issues apply to binary distribution, we should still be
> able to make official source releases.
>
> Regards,
> Sheng
>
> > On Jul 12, 2020, at 1:10 AM, Marco de Abreu
>
Hi Marco,
Since the license issues apply to binary distribution, we should still be able
to make official source releases.
Regards,
Sheng
> On Jul 12, 2020, at 1:10 AM, Marco de Abreu wrote:
>
> Are we in the position to make a release given that we have open license
> issues with the ipmc a
Are we in the position to make a release given that we have open license
issues with the ipmc and Apache board? I want to avoid giving the
impression that we are ignoring their requests - my current understanding
is that we are non compliant.
-Marco
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020, 9:46 AM Tong He wrote:
