On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 2:19 PM Bob Paulin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I agree there does not appear to be consensus on when it's appropriate to
> add Apache License Headers to Third Party code across projects. Here is
> Justin's email that request the Apache Headers removed [1]
>
>
>
> - file copyright
e write access to incubator wiki, please post the
> report.
>
> Regards,
> Stefffen
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:43 PM John D. Ament wrote:
>
> > You need to get this report posted on the incubator wiki.
> >
> > Some questions about the report.
>
[ ] Working towards first release
[ ] Community building
[ ] Nearing graduation
[ ] Other:
Date of last release:
N/A
When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?
N/A
Signed-off-by:
[ ](dubbo) Justin Mclean
Comments:
[X](dubbo) John D. Ament
Comments: Podling is moving
t;
> > Steffen
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 7:23 AM John D. Ament
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Just to point out - the report was due on 4/4. You'll need to get the
> >> report in very early to ensure your mentors can review.
> &
Just to point out - the report was due on 4/4. You'll need to get the report
in very early to ensure your mentors can review.
On 2018/04/08 01:45:46, Steffen Rochel wrote:
> Hi John - we will get a report out tomorrow (Sunday PDT).
> Steffen
>
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 5:19
Is anyone available to write the report? Need some kind of response from the
podling...
On 2018/04/03 02:43:12, Hen wrote:
> Board report time. Any committer available to write something?
>
> Reminder of the template:
>
> MXNetA Flexible and Efficient Library for Deep LearningMXNet has been
One question about the below. We've noted that much of the source code for
MXNet is coming from the external DMLC repos. Are there plans to move
those repos into the ASF?
John
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:13 PM Hen wrote:
> +1.
>
> Items I note should happen post release are:
>
> * Move the vario
ver
> > added, which was confirmed by checking via Whimsy.
> >
> > > On Oct 6, 2017, at 7:40 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2017-10-06 00:30, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > >> Done. Markus + Jim left :)
> > >
l use Confluence for the next
> > > report.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 6:11 PM, John D. Ament
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Its great to see community working on a report. don't forget to post
> > it
> > > &g
Bhavin,
You may want to review
http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact#request-checklist . This section
specifically, but the entire page may be of use.
John
On 2017-10-06 12:35, Bhavin Thaker wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> Instead of this email getting lost in the hundreds of emails on dev@,
> s
Dear Apache MXNet Podling,
I would like to request that you migrate off of your external Slack
instance and into the common one used, hosted as the-ask.slack.com. By
default sign up is restricted to @apache.org email addressed, but I would
be happy to facilitate giving more people access to it.
Its great to see community working on a report. don't forget to post it to the
wiki. In addition, I would like to see you move the creation of it into ASF
infrastructure. Many projects use Confluence to write it, others use private
SVN repos.
On 2017-10-03 18:01, Chris Olivier wrote:
> Are
All,
This coming weekend (9/29) I plan to remove the roster sections from all
podling status pages.
Podling rosters are meant to be managed in Whimsy. The roster in the
status page is redundant and end up out of sync. In place of the roster, I
will be adding a link automatically to all podling
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:15 PM Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:38 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:27 PM Henri Yandell
> wrote:
> >
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:27 PM Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"?
>>
>>
> Yes, for any file that we don't have full agreement (ICLA on file) we
> can't r
y "Licensed to the ASF" (it's in the ICLA).
It's not a big deal, since its Apache licensed, we just have to be careful
we're removing someone's pre-existing claim.
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 18:15 John D. Ament wrote:
>
> > Ok, so here's my +1 to re
; >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > > On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > >
> > > Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release.
> > Will
> > > review tonight; hopefully their mento
that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release.
> Will
> > review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
> >
> > There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code has
> > been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
> >
&
enri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and vote?
>
> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this project?
> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
>
> Dom
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D.
Done!
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 2:44 AM Henri Yandell wrote:
> Hi Incubator folk with Chair permissions,
>
> Could someone add cjolivier01 (Chris) and skm (Sandeep) to Jenkins for
> MXNet please?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hen
>
We're not OK with you just dumping it
into your repos yet.
>
>> Dom
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 3:26 AM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ideally they would provide the contribution under the Apache License, v2.
>>> Are they maintaining these
will make any changes.
>
> Sounds like we are ok either way. So thanks!
>
We're OK to start an IP Clearance. We're not OK with you just dumping it
into your repos yet.
>
> Dom
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 3:26 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
>> Ideally
Ideally they would provide the contribution under the Apache License, v2.
Are they maintaining these files going forward, or are they ending up in
the Apache MXNet repository? Would they be agreeable to providing an ICLA
or an SGA?
Either way, this falls under the Incubator's IP Clearance policy.
h any concerns.
Regards,
John D. Ament
VP, Apache Incubator
Both have been added.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 5:44 AM Henri Yandell wrote:
> Hi PMC-Chair type folk on general@incubator.
>
> Could someone add Naveen Swamy (nswamy@) and Mu Li (muli@) to the Jenkins
> ldap group please.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Hen
>
All,
Please be advised that the infra team is aware of a permission problem that
is affecting podlings ability to write to the incubator dist area. This
may cause you to be unable to create staged releases and promote those to
the public mirrors. You can track the status in
https://issues.apache
Mu,
So what happens when ZeroMQ is not available, do you fall back to something
else?
I'm inclined to say that this is allowable, knowing that its an optional
dynamically linked dependency that has an alternative. Assuming it has an
alternative.
I would strongly encourage podlings to try to lev
Hen,
Can you give some more info about how MXnet uses ZeroMQ? Is it an optional
dependency or required? Are you actually bundling ZeroMQ in your release
(source or binary)?
John
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:23 AM Henri Yandell wrote:
> One of the items that is on the list to do before releasing
All,
We're piloting a new format for the podling status pages. Specifically,
the current status page leaves a lot to be desired - it's basically crafted
html, there's no structure and its hard to find missing items. The end
goal is to have a web form editable in Whimsy, but until we get more inp
Podlings,
I wanted to raise a point to all, hence the direct emails.
The Whimsy PMC has put together a roster tool for managing the committers
in a podling. Rather than managing the committer list in your status file,
this will keep track and make sure we list out everyone's valid IDs.
If you h
When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?
- Initial committers only.
Signed-off-by:
[ ](juneau) Craig Russell
Comments:
[ ](juneau) Jochen Wiedmann
Comments:
[X](juneau) John D. Ament
Comments: The podling's struggling a bit with community growth. Th
All,
I'm wondering, does MXNet plan to report this month? Or should we expect the
first report with March's timeline?
John
On 2017-01-26 17:46 (-0500), Henri Yandell wrote:
> Hi MXNet Community :)
>
> There are 40-odd emails subscribed now, so looks like the list is ready to
> be used in ang
32 matches
Mail list logo
