Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2018-12-02 Thread Anirudh Acharya
string_hash_code.c - it's not being > > built > > > > and > > > > > > > it's > > > > > > > > not part of the binaries release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are two parts to it. > > >

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2018-12-02 Thread Steffen Rochel
> To: mailto:dev@mxnet. > > > > > > incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Really thank you for the info. > > > >

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-11 Thread Qiang Kou
gt; > > For Spark binaries release, R package is built and the output is > > > > packaged > > > > > > along with the rest of all jars and python stuff. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is also a source-only R package tha

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-11 Thread Naveen Swamy
> > > > > > > There is also a source-only R package that we want to publish to > > CRAN. > > > > > This contains only R source (no java stuff). CRAN will then build > > cross > > > > > platform from that source - but again the part with > > string_hash_code.c > >

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-11 Thread Ly Nguyen
AN. > > > > This contains only R source (no java stuff). CRAN will then build > cross > > > > platform from that source - but again the part with > string_hash_code.c > > is > > > > disabled. > > > > > > > > I guess we

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-11 Thread Qiang Kou
ing_hash_code.c > is > > > disabled. > > > > > > I guess we should have removed string_hash_code.c from source but we > are > > > secretly hoping we could sort that out at some point in the future.. > (ie. > > > building cross platform) > > > > > > > > > _

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-11 Thread Ly Nguyen
t; disabled. > > > > I guess we should have removed string_hash_code.c from source but we are > > secretly hoping we could sort that out at some point in the future.. (ie. > > building cross platform) > > > > > > _ >

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-10 Thread Qiang Kou
the way SparkR is packaged in Spark release we haven't > > figured out how to release cross multiple platforms. > > > > (I'm one of the main contributor to SparkR) > > > > > > From: Henri Yandell mailto:bay...@apache.org>&g

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-07 Thread Felix Cheung
g we could sort that out at some point in the future.. (ie. building cross platform) _ From: Qiang Kou mailto:q...@umail.iu.edu>> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 8:34 AM Subject: Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet To: mailto:dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org>> Re

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-07 Thread Qiang Kou
d in Spark release we haven't > figured out how to release cross multiple platforms. > > (I'm one of the main contributor to SparkR) > > > From: Henri Yandell > Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 12:02:16 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apa

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-07 Thread Felix Cheung
y SparkR is packaged in Spark release we haven't figured out how to release cross multiple platforms. (I'm one of the main contributor to SparkR) From: Henri Yandell Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 12:02:16 AM To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re:

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-07 Thread Henri Yandell
mponent, then it is required and such required component > cannot > > be one of the prohibited licenses. > > > > https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x > > > > Probably a good idea to start a thread with legal@ if there are more > &

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-06 Thread Qiang Kou
____ > From: Qiang Kou mailto:q...@umail.iu.edu>> > Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 3:41 PM > Subject: Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet > To: mailto:dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > >> > > > Hi, Felix, > > I just want to make sure there is no misunderstanding betw

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-06 Thread Felix Cheung
pache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x Probably a good idea to start a thread with legal@ if there are more questions. _ From: Qiang Kou mailto:q...@umail.iu.edu>> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 3:41 PM Subject: Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet To: mailto:dev@mxnet.incuba

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-06 Thread Qiang Kou
Hi, Felix, I just want to make sure there is no misunderstanding between us. (1) The MXNet R package heavily used the Rcpp package, but we only include the header file, Rcpp.h, like https://github.com/dmlc/mxnet/ blob/master/R-package/src/base.h#L11 The MXNet R package doesn't contain any source

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-06 Thread Qiang Kou
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Felix Cheung wrote: > Awesome - Rcpp11 is MIT license. > > Would Rcpp be up for relicensing Personally, I don't think Rcpp will be relicensed. > or would Rcpp11 be have in the roadmap required features to match Rcpp? > I don't know their plan. However, from t

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-06 Thread Felix Cheung
:46 AM Subject: Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet To: mailto:dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org>> Hi, I am also in the Rcpp core team. Rcpp11 is a reimplementation of Rcpp using C++ 11 features. However, it lacks some features we used in MXNet R pacakge. Best, KK On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:

Re: Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-06 Thread Qiang Kou
Hi, I am also in the Rcpp core team. Rcpp11 is a reimplementation of Rcpp using C++ 11 features. However, it lacks some features we used in MXNet R pacakge. Best, KK On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Felix Cheung wrote: > On a related note, Rcpp, used extensively in the R package, is GPLv2/GPLv

Rcpp licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-06 Thread Felix Cheung
On a related note, Rcpp, used extensively in the R package, is GPLv2/GPLv3 licensed. I'm not aware of any other R package available that supports R<->C++. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rcpp/index.html _