body onload does not exist
--
Key: TOMAHAWK-706
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-706
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 1.1.3
Reporter: Remo Liechti
PPRPanelGroup partialTriggerPattern js-function produces JS-error when invoked
with non-string object
-
Key: TOMAHAWK-707
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
I think I haven't quite got it right as to how to manage data in JSF. Can
you please give some sort of a basic infrastructural recommendation.
What I have right now is
1. A datatable with _value_ set to a property of type _DataModel_ in a
backing bean.
2. the backing bean is of session scope.
3. I
PPRPanelGroup should support an inline Loading Message
--
Key: TOMAHAWK-708
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-708
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: New Feature
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-663?page=comments#action_12437782
]
Mario Buonopane commented on TOMAHAWK-663:
--
I'm sorry but i analizing the problem i see the following warning on my log:
SRTServletRes W WARNING: Can
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-708?page=all ]
Ernst Fastl updated TOMAHAWK-708:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> PPRPanelGroup should support an inline Loading Message
> --
>
>
wrong text for link in getting started
---
Key: MYFACES-1425
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1425
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: website
Reporter
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-707?page=all ]
Ernst Fastl updated TOMAHAWK-707:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> PPRPanelGroup partialTriggerPattern js-function produces JS-error when
> invoked with non-string object
> --
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-90?page=comments#action_12437805
]
robert commented on TOMAHAWK-90:
Could it be, that this problem happens when the < f:verbatim> is used inside
the panelTabbedPane. I had a problem with CommandLi
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-663?page=comments#action_12437859
]
Mike Youngstrom commented on TOMAHAWK-663:
--
Based on the error you submitted it looks like the same problem. I'm quite
sure this is a websphere proble
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-90?page=all ]
Noah Sloan updated TOMAHAWK-90:
---
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
> t:panelTabbedPane breaks commandLinks
> -
>
> Key: TOMAHAWK-90
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-663?page=comments#action_12437886
]
Mario Buonopane commented on TOMAHAWK-663:
--
Can you give me the ticket reference you already submitted? (so i can use the
same text)
Is there any work
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-689?page=comments#action_12437904
]
Sergio Rodríguez commented on TOMAHAWK-689:
---
Hello, I'm having this problem. I can't change popupcalendar style.
Take a look to my application.. it i
Hi there,
Ed Burns, Jesse Alexander and me will be heading a discussion on what
our users dreamed JSF 2.0 would be like - on friday, 2006/09/29, in
Munich, at the Oktoberfest.
So it's a good opportunity for both talking about JSF and drinking
beer - probably the best of the world. We'll meet up
I'm am aloud to curse on this board. You lucky bastards!!!
Frank Russo
Senior Developer
FX Alliance, LLC
-Original Message-
From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 2:58 PM
To: MyFaces Development; MyFaces Discussion
Subject: [OFFTOPIC] What
Where are we with re-branching for Tomahawk 1.1.4?
Please don't take this as "hurry up, already!" because I have plenty
to keep me busy. :)
I just want to make sure that no one is waiting for me... because I'm
waiting for word that all (or most) of the changes are in.
--
Wendy
It might be worthwhile to check out some of the stuff proposed by HLS for
tapestry 5-- I do like the way he/others are handling bindings instead of
exposing them to the end developer. The way bindings/attributes are handled in
JSF are by far the worst aspect of the API (maybe a close second to
Wendy Smoak schrieb:
Where are we with re-branching for Tomahawk 1.1.4?
Please don't take this as "hurry up, already!" because I have plenty
to keep me busy. :)
I just want to make sure that no one is waiting for me... because I'm
waiting for word that all (or most) of the changes are in.
eve
It's a pity that you can't be around, Jacob. Imagine all this beer.
Well, maybe next year!
regards,
Martin
On 9/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It might be worthwhile to check out some of the stuff proposed by HLS for
tapestry 5-- I do like the way he/others are handling
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-706?page=comments#action_12437930
]
Werner Punz commented on TOMAHAWK-706:
--
I dont think this is a real issue, onload is inherently evil and causes more
problems than it solves.
To my experie
Everyone is waiting for me, I know ;)
I just wanted to fix one final little thing in JavaScript generation -
I'll hurry up, I promise.
regards,
Martin
On 9/26/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wendy Smoak schrieb:
> Where are we with re-branching for Tomahawk 1.1.4?
>
> Please don't
I do have 5 kegs coming for my wedding this weekend ;-)
I am checking with Ryan Lubke about getting a wiki started at
javaserverfaces-spec-public for ideas from users/developers for JSF 2.0, I'm
sure something would work at apache too :-)
>It's a pity that you can't be around, Jacob. Imagine a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-663?page=comments#action_12437934
]
Mike Youngstrom commented on TOMAHAWK-663:
--
I haven't actually created a ticket yet. :) I figured THIEN PHAM's ticket was
good enough and then I got b
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-663?page=comments#action_12438022
]
Mario Buonopane commented on TOMAHAWK-663:
--
How can i get THIEN PHAM's ticket reverence?
Is there a way to modify few points of code to write directly
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1425?page=all ]
Matthias Weßendorf resolved MYFACES-1425.
-
Fix Version/s: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
Resolution: Fixed
fixed
> wrong text for link in getting started
> -
FYI
(posted to shale)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sep 26, 2006 10:12 PM
Subject: [OFFTOPIC] What I wish that JSF 2.0 would be like...
To: adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org, adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org
Hi there,
Ed Burns, Jess
regarding the current ajax hype...
what I don't want to see the JSF.next (aka 2.0) is ajax-based
components or even new components like calendar or what ever. Nobody
needs them in a standard!
let's work on the API.
what should be there?
-Jacob already pointed out to look at Tapestry 5, maybe th
>-bookmark support
Have seen more than one project go to Rails and Struts because of bookmarks and
the learning curve argument.
Dennis Byrne
>-action based support or at least a "soft" integration hook
>*There should be a "standardized" way for a (real) front-controller
>for getting access in a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-706?page=comments#action_12438041
]
Mario Ivankovits commented on TOMAHAWK-706:
---
Yea, I had the same experience, but wasnt sure if the "body onload" is still
broken.
For what I was is, t
29 matches
Mail list logo
