The defaultCommand of button should have a special markup
---
Key: TOBAGO-1044
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-1044
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type: Improvement
unsynchronized lazy initialization could create concurrency errors
--
Key: MYFACES-3377
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3377
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg resolved MYFACES-3377.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
unsynchronized lazy initialization
+0
I'll find 160 much, even with a wide screen.
On 26 October 2011 21:39, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
+0
2011/10/26 Grant Smith work.gr...@gmail.com:
+1
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Michael Kurz michi.k...@gmx.at wrote:
-1
Am 26.10.2011 14:18, schrieb Mark
+1
--
Rudy De Busscher
http://www.c4j.be
On 27 October 2011 00:56, Grant Smith work.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 Be ruthless !
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF
Hi Jakob,
thank you for your answer. I agree to your explanation. Although I believe
Jetty does work as expected. It allows concurrent exceptions, the only
thing it is missing is the fact that it returns input streams also when
they are closed.
I would assume that it would be more suitable if
+1 for deleting
Regards Bernd
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi folks!
I see a lot of commented out code which is many years old.
I'm highly in favour to just delete code we don't need anymore!
IF you only temporarily comment out something, then
Hi!
we have lots of classes which implement equals but no hashCode() - this is bad.
e.g. DoubleRangeValidator has an equals but doesn't include _transient in it's
comparison. Is this ok?
LieGrue,
strub
I think it is ok to ignore transient values for equals/hasCode since
it is also not saved as part of the state. But I'm not an expert.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi!
we have lots of classes which implement equals but no hashCode() - this is
bad.
Hi Mike!
_transient is _not_ a transient value, but is the value returned by
StateHolder#isTransient()
http://javaserverfaces.java.net/nonav/docs/2.0/javadocs/javax/faces/component/StateHolder.html#isTransient%28%29
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Mike Kienenberger
Yes, I know that.
But since it is not part of the state, and would be lost anyway on a
saveState/restoreState, I don't think it needs to be considered for
equals.
It seems to be a transient value :)
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi Mike!
_transient
oki, thanks for this info!
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org; Mark Struberg
strub...@yahoo.de
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: StateHolder#isTransient equals and
Please don't take my word for it. I am guessing somewhat here. I
admit that I don't really know. But it does seem like equality and
saved state should be related.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
oki, thanks for this info!
LieGrue,
strub
-
Hi!
The double-check-lock idiom was fundamentally broken up until Java5. With
JSR-133 this got finally fixed.
We use this design pattern in our code since a long time (of course not always
correct due to the missing 'volatile' declaration), but it really only works
with Java5 upwards.
So
+1
2011/10/27 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
Hi!
The double-check-lock idiom was fundamentally broken up until Java5. With
JSR-133 this got finally fixed.
We use this design pattern in our code since a long time (of course not
always correct due to the missing 'volatile' declaration),
+1 !!
Regards,
Jakob
2011/10/27 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com:
+1 for deleting
Regards Bernd
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi folks!
I see a lot of commented out code which is many years old.
I'm highly in favour to just delete code
UIComponent.setParent does not propagate setInView() call when processingEvents
is false
Key: MYFACES-3378
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3378
PostAddToViewEvent should be propagated to UIViewRoot
-
Key: MYFACES-3379
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3379
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACES-3379.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
2.0.10
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe reopened MYFACES-3377:
-
The change should be applied only to AbstractThreadSafeAttributeMap. For the
other cases,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACES-3377.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.10
unsynchronized lazy initialization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACES-3378.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
2.0.10
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACES-3374.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
2.0.10
Removing usage
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13137429#comment-13137429
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3358:
-
Spec issue created for reference:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13137507#comment-13137507
]
Mark Struberg commented on MYFACES-3368:
Leo, can you please check the following
hi @ all,
this is a new thread based on [1].
the idea of an internal incubator:
esp. gsoc projects (for myfaces) could move pretty easy to myfaces.
as soon as we see that there is a community for it, we can promote such a
project (as an own sub-project or as a module of an existing
+1
LieGrue,
strub
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 11:18 PM
Subject: [DISCUSS] internal incubator
hi @ all,
this is a new thread based on [1].
the idea of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MFCOMMONS-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg reopened MFCOMMONS-33:
Assignee: Mark Struberg (was: Leonardo Uribe)
We shall drop GZIP handler since this
Hi folks!
I'm just comparing the original proposal of the resource handler from Jakob
(which works fine)
http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/relative-resource-handler/source/checkout
and what we do have now in myfaces-commons-resource-handler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MFCOMMONS-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13137670#comment-13137670
]
Mark Struberg commented on MFCOMMONS-33:
Just to clarify that before any
Guys,
Just a note on the concept of a mini-incubator: been there, done
that [1]. The basic available approaches are noted at [2] (search for
Some possible solutions).
Matt
[1] http://markmail.org/message/n3t7lksceuplh45r
[2] http://markmail.org/message/r6ffmmyh6pxnn6nd
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011
Hi
I think you have the wrong impression, basically because you haven't
tried to solve each one of the problems that the code try to solve. Is
like the blind that try to see the elephant and say that is like a
tree, because it touching its leg.
To keep things simple, I'll describe and explain
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MFCOMMONS-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13137826#comment-13137826
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MFCOMMONS-33:
-
Really EL expressions are only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13138034#comment-13138034
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3259:
-
I checked again the solution proposed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13138042#comment-13138042
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3368:
-
Ok, no problem, but give me some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13138046#comment-13138046
]
Matt Benson commented on MYFACES-3259:
--
Thanks for all the attention to this, Leo!
36 matches
Mail list logo
