Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.2.9-core, 1.2.10-core
Environment: All
Reporter: Blake Sullivan
The implementations of ValueBindingValueExpression and
ValueExpressionValueBinding have several problems:
ValueBindingValueExpression doesn't correctly
Issue Type: Improvement
Environment: all
Reporter: Blake Sullivan
1) Add support for checking the Application Map, similar to the Session Map
checking in JIRA-1245 by adding application as one of the values allowed in
the system property.
The value can be retrieved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blake Sullivan updated TRINIDAD-1249:
-
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
Further improvements to JIRA-1245 High
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blake Sullivan updated TRINIDAD-1249:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Further improvements to JIRA-1245 High
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1251
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.2.9-core, 1.2.10-core
Environment: all
Reporter: Blake Sullivan
CollectionUtils.getSerializableList() attempt to optimize
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Archetype
Affects Versions: 1.2.9-core
Environment: All
Reporter: Blake Sullivan
Assignee: Matthias Weßendorf
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.2.10-core
Versions: 1.2.9-core
Environment: All
Reporter: Blake Sullivan
Priority: Minor
Most Servlet Engines support fail over for high availability by replicating
changes the the Session state to other servers. This requires that all of the
state and substate
triggers exist?
-- Blake Sullivan
Andrew Robinson (JIRA) said the following On 9/24/2008 7:55 PM PT:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson resolved TRINIDAD-663
work well with partialTriggers or partialTargets,
but a Renderer can override this to always render the id if any partial
triggers are set (and in fact, the rich client does). However, the
Renderer knows nothing about other partial targets.
-- Blake Sullivan
-Andrew
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12633841#action_12633841
]
Blake Sullivan commented on TRINIDAD-1238:
--
Thanks for the clarification. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12633844#action_12633844
]
Blake Sullivan commented on TRINIDAD-1238:
--
I suspect that there is a little
.
Reporter: Blake Sullivan
Trinidad supports state saving of component attributes by delegating to the
PropertyKey implementations. For non-CAP_STATE_HOLDER, non CAP_LIST
attributes, the PropertyKey assumes that simply returning the value is
sufficient. If the value is Serializable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blake Sullivan updated TRINIDAD-1236:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Trinidad should be able to state save non
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blake Sullivan updated TRINIDAD-1236:
-
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
Trinidad should be able to state save non
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blake Sullivan updated TRINIDAD-1236:
-
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
Trinidad should be able to state save non
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blake Sullivan updated TRINIDAD-1236:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Trinidad should be able to state save non
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12633559#action_12633559
]
Blake Sullivan commented on TRINIDAD-1238:
--
Could you be more explicit about
The tricky issue with remembering this state in the server is cleaning
up if the redirect request never comes back. If you are content to wait
until the session times-out, or there is another dialog request, then it
isn't a problem.
-- Blake Sullivan
Scott O'Bryan (JIRA) said the following
/browse/TRINIDAD-1193
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.2.9-core, 1.0.9-core
Environment: Affects all environments
Reporter: Blake Sullivan
The Trinidad StateManagerImpl optimizes state management by caching UiViewRoot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blake Sullivan updated TRINIDAD-1193:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Trinidad StateManagerImpl doesn't clean up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12620866#action_12620866
]
Blake Sullivan commented on TRINIDAD-1164:
--
To calrify my comment further
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12615442#action_12615442
]
Blake Sullivan commented on TRINIDAD-1164:
--
In the case where both the list
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12597529#action_12597529
]
Blake Sullivan commented on TRINIDAD-697:
-
From Adam Winer's e-mail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12597532#action_12597532
]
Blake Sullivan commented on TRINIDAD-697:
-
Adam's proposal would work in all
of these we prefer, if
we want to go here at all right now, also depends on how often we think
page authors would use this feature.
-- Blake Sullivan
Andrew Robinson said the following On 5/15/2008 2:02 PM PT:
I would like to get back on track to the original subject and not let
the messaging
architectural changes at all.
-- Adam
Solve
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-697
at the framework level?
-- Blake Sullivan
Andrew Robinson said the following On 5/15/2008 11:03 AM PT:
He mentioned ways to do it using backing beans and non-declarative
ways. He also didn't like my
author.
-- Blake Sullivan
Adding a new components gives users the flexibility to choose the way
they want to implement it and be able to work with non-Trinidad
libraries. IMO this is a much better solution than a small enhancement
for Trinidad messaging and JavaScript.
-Andrew
On Thu, May 15
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12596463#action_12596463
]
Blake Sullivan commented on TRINIDAD-799:
-
If the current implementation doesn't
and agent that we see (as opposed to one per major agent version
as we do now).
-- Blake Sullivan
Blake said there is something like this in Rich Client already and
that you could donate the regex used for that.
But since then he didn't give any sign of the code and I had no time
to bug him
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/19/2008 3:51 AM PT:
or @agent ie and (version:6) and (version:8)
This rule would never be true because it is asserting that the agent
must match IE and the version must match both 6.* and 8.*
-- Blake Sullivan
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Blake
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/19/2008 10:58 AM PT:
:) yep, I forgot about the and
is or valid in those CSS rules?
No. That's what the comma is for.
-- Blake Sullivan
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Blake Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cristi Toth
:1.9.2)
does not match because the browser version 1.9 expands to 1.9.0 and
1.9.2 is than 1.9.0
// actual browser version gecko 1.9
@agent gecko and (min-version:1.9.*)
matches because the browser version 1.9 expands to 1.9.0 and 1.9.* == 1.9.0
-- Blake Sullivan
Blake Sullivan said
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/18/2008 2:58 PM PT:
I like this too
does the list of space separated numbers comply to that CSS future
spec we were talking about?
I don't think it does.
-- Blake Sullivan
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL
:6), ie and (version:8)
-- Blake Sullivan
Or this doesn't make sense?
Glauco P. Gomes
Matt Cooper escreveu:
It does:
@agent ie and (min-version:5) and (max-version:7) {
/* styles for all 5.*, 6.*, and 7.* versions of the IE agent versions */
}
Regards,
Matt
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 5:02 PM
this Object to be
returned by the Agent.
-- Blake Sullivan
Blake Sullivan said the following On 4/18/2008 3:15 PM PT:
OK, how about
option 5) the version feature is a String that matches the native
major.minor.whatever format of the browser's engine. If the
browser's engine uses non
don't know what it means, but I assume it's very browser dependent.
Determining a floating point browser version isn't a technical problem
and should be supported. The Gecko engine is an example of an engine
that adds CSS features in point releases 1.8 - 1.9 for example.
-- Blake Sullivan
But do
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/16/2008 11:32 PM PT:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Blake Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/16/2008 5:34 PM PT:
Hi Blake,
I wanted to be backwards compatible with what the XSS
) is potentially confusing due to inconsistency
3) might not be immediately obvious and could theoretically have
precision problems
4) is not immediately obvious either but incredibly flexible
I vote for 3) since it gets the job done and doesn't preclude doing more
later.
-- Blake Sullivan
== true
-- Blake Sullivan
If so, I like 3 as well.
-Andrew
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Blake Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we agree that we like the we like the media query syntax and that the
only issue is how to handle less than (as opposed the =) for the
max-version, then we
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/17/2008 2:00 PM PT:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Blake Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Robinson said the following On 4/17/2008 12:35 PM PT:
So do I read this correctly that for #3, 8 means 8.x so
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/17/2008 2:00 PM PT:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Blake Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Robinson said the following On 4/17/2008 12:35 PM PT:
So do I read this correctly that for #3, 8 means 8.x so
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/17/2008 2:25 PM PT:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Blake Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/17/2008 2:00 PM PT
Does anybody KNOW how the browsers express their version exactly
-version 7.5 really means version 7.6)
-- Blake Sullivan
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/16/2008 3:24 PM PT:
Hi guys,
I finally added browser version support in skinning, but using a
different format than first suggested.
As we needed to support multiple browsers, each with multiple
(OK many times), I'll send a two page plan out
for review and you're only comments will be on these two minor points
that I got wrong.
To repeat, I'm sorry.
-- Blake Sullivan
Andrew Robinson said the following On 4/15/2008 9:01 AM PT:
I wish to withdraw and clarify the scope of my apology
the guaranteed lifetime for these
changes is.
-- Blake Sullivan
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Cristi Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
Dividing this thread is the best thing.
But I think we either reached a conclusion or we should start a vote about
final/private methods
We can change
the particular problems we were experiencing
at that point in time. Therefore, if you want to extend a Trinidad
Renderer class, even in an unsupported fashion, you need to accept that
you might need to hack.
-- Blake Sullivan
If you don't personally agree to go through each and every source file
for the best on upgrades does not decrease their maintenance burden.
-- Blake Sullivan
I fully agree that #2 is the solution though and even that we need to
make some part of the trinidad rendering in the API, because I
strongly feel that only having components in the API is just
up a new version and knows that he might be hosed if the
superclass code changed (which he should recheck when he reapplies his
hack).
-- Blake Sullivan
The other solution is to open things up in response to need. Since
there is already a clear path for dealing with missing functionality
with an artificial reason
for why they can not do this.
This has definitely ceased being a productive discussion.
-- Blake Sullivan
possible
subclasser might want.
If there really are huge chunks of interesting code that should be
shared in this case, they can be broken out into utilities and shared
that way.
-- Blake Sullivan
-Andrew
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Andy Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10
implementation.
-- Blake Sullivan
Python goes further, it has no final, everything is mutable. The idea
is to give ppl. the power they need and let them shoot themselves in
the foot if they want to.
This isn't just a matter of principle. I challenge you to author a
real world application
. a desire to be able to change the Renderer implementation without
breaking subclassers. I actually think that we went too far in
providing lots of subclasser knobs in Trinidad, but that's just my opinion.
-- Blake Sullivan
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/9/2008 5:23 PM PT:
Hi guys,
A lot
these cases.
-- Blake Sullivan
Andy Schwartz said the following On 3/22/2008 5:15 AM PT:
Hey All -
The concern with exposing a public component-level tabIndex attribute
has always been that this opens up the potential for way more problems
than it solves. The problem with HTML tabIndex attribute
Jeanne Waldman (JIRA) said the following On 3/18/2008 2:03 PM PT:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12580079#action_12580079 ]
Jeanne Waldman commented on TRINIDAD-1014:
requirements.
support for:
- subforms
- different types of focus handling
What types?
- conventions
What conventions?
We are looking for actual use cases as opposed to support everything
that this piece of code supports.
-- Blake Sullivan
and of course:
the solutions shouldn't break backward
Gerhard,
What are the semantics of the groups and how do they compare to subforms?
-- Blake Sullivan
Gerhard Petracek (JIRA) said the following On 3/11/2008 1:46 AM PT:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment
against the
likelihood of regression? It seems that your disagreement is with the
relative weighting of the advantages and disadvantages in this case,
which is a fair complaint but isn't precedent setting.
-- Blake Sullivan
Scott
Max Starets wrote:
I'd say leave it in UIXComponentBase
be depending on this API. I don't by the let's break
it and see if anyone complains attitude, and that is the precedent I
was referring to.
I don't think anyone ever said that we shouldn't ask the list.
-- Blake Sullivan
This is why I mentioned that I'm willing to concede the point if
nobody
and then have to explain when you
should use one rather than the other.
-- Blake Sullivan
the whole issue is based on common requirements of real world projects.
i'm sure that there is a reason for the current approach. however,
there are also other opinions out there.
so it would be great
Jeanne,
Can't we use the old code path in the case where the form component is
not a naming container and the scoped id contains less than 2 colons.
This is probably by far the most common case and I believe that the
result is the same across all three schemes.
-- Blake
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ConcurrentHashMap, which uses lock striping internally.
-- Blake Sullivan
If we are able to satisfy our requirements by going down this route, I
would prefer this over adding a somewhat-redundant API to Trinidad
(ie. would prefer fixing the underlying problems so that we can use
the Application map
Andy Schwartz wrote:
Hey Blake -
On Jan 30, 2008 11:52 AM, Blake Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is more of an issue, however the other problem is that the
ServletContext and Session still don't expose the atomic operations of
ConcurrentMap. Neither do they document what object
Andy Schwartz wrote:
Hey Blake -
On Jan 30, 2008 3:57 PM, Blake Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that we do want to do this, but we can hold off until we have
concrete needs unless the synchronization is actually killing our
performance on the Servlet Container implementations
I'm, of course, in favor.
-- Blake Sullivan
Gabrielle Crawford wrote:
Hi,
In case anyone filtered away the [jira] message.
I'd like to add the method described below to the requestContext.
Comments? Objections?
Thanks,
Gab
Original Message
add method to get
useless.
In the future, I think we should make that method as well as
PropertyKey class generic aware.
I completely agree. I did this on a branch one night but never got
around to submitting the patch.
-- Blake Sullivan
Regards,
~ Simon
/**
* This method evaluates the property
convenience functions, then it is confusing to have
both the class itself and a separate Utils class. Given that we have a
separate Utils class, these methods shouldn't be on the abstract class.
-- Blake Sullivan
-Andrew
/browse/TRINIDAD-905
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Components
Affects Versions: 1.2.6-core
Reporter: Blake Sullivan
Fix For: 1.2.6-core
Components that solely setup context for their children, logically
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blake Sullivan updated TRINIDAD-905:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Support ability for Renderers to recursively skip
.
-- Blake Sullivan
that the String that we pass
to the NumberFormatter has no spaces in it?
-- Blake
-Matthias
On Nov 30, 2007 7:25 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blake,
out of the blue, but perhaps that is a JDK bug?
I am on 1.5.0_11
On Nov 30, 2007 7:14 PM, Blake Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED
Matthias,
If the committers want to spend their time backporting fixes to 1.0.x,
that's their right.
-- Blake Sullivan
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
what do you think about doing a 1.0.4 release soon, and the afterwards
created 1.2.4-branch becomes trunk then.
The 1.0.x development goes
no regressions relative to 1.0.x. I
would have thought that waiting at least seventeen months to cur over to
1.2 would ahve been long enough.
-- Blake Sullivan
- anyone else want to chime in.
Danny
On 10/29/07, *Scott O'Bryan* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah
Winer handled most of it.
-- Blake Sullivan
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On 10/24/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/07, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO, the 1.1 would still act as the main trunk for new features that
are not 1.2 specific. It would
, the need
for JSF 1.1 won't be that large as now.
Yep. I assume the JSF 1.1 - 1.2 change is more painful because of the
J2EE container requirement (which hopefully JSF 2.0 will take better
advantage of than 1.2 does).
-- Blake Sullivan
To me, this makes sense.
-M
-- Blake
like important
resource-bundle with a var name within the faces-config.xml.
This would also be useful, but isn't mutually exclusive with the above.
-- Blake Sullivan
~ Simon
On 9/21/07, *Jeanne Waldman* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a new issue I need to resolve
of trunk?
+1
Adding features in too early is a good way to make problems for
ourselves later. Once we are certain that we understand the problem
space, if these components are the best solution, it will be easy to
move them to trunk.
-- Blake Sullivan
-- Adam
are either
dangerous for compatibility and/or cases where HotSpot can determine
that the optimization is possible based on the classes actually loaded
in your application, which optimizes all of the non-final cases as well.
-- Blake Sullivan
AFAIK, there is zero benefit to performance from
Adam Winer wrote:
On 8/22/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/22/07, Danny Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys,
Now we're into 1.0.3, I'd like to enable the inline validation for
'onchange' of an input component. I'd like to start some discussion on how
we'd
one
another.--their keys are supposed to be disjoint. Therefore, I would go
for Collection.
-- Blake Sullivan
Regards,
~ Simon
On 7/24/07, *Jeanne Waldman* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks everyone. I'm almost done with the implementation.
What should
.
Is this map of id-FacesMessage[] or id -ListFacesMessage?
-- Blake Sullivan
-- Adam
* Fix the order of output messages. Currently messages output by
the
above
methods appear in the order of required errors, convertor errors,
validator
errors. Rather than the order in which
Considering that I reviewed them, it isn't surprising that I like all of
these changes.
-- Blake Sullivan
Jeanne Waldman wrote:
Hi there,
I have some new Skin API proposals I would like to run by everyone.
This involves public API changes and some private IMPL changes, and
comes up while I
How does this compare to JSUnit?
-- Blake
Adam Winer wrote:
This'd be SWEET!
-- Adam
On 7/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
perhaps we should add some Unit tests (via [1]) to Trinidad,
to test stuff like our converters:
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import
/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-18
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Skinning
Affects Versions: 1.0.1-core, 2.0.0-core
Environment: Windows XP
Reporter: Blake Sullivan
Assignee: Jeanne Waldman
Fix For: 1.0.1-core
I
the latter)
Do surrogates count as a character?
-- Blake Sullivan
- If min and max are the same, we don't have a custom message,
so you'd get something like Enter a value between 5 and 5
characters. Looks silly. So, in addition to
LengthValidator.NOT_IN_RANGE, I'll add LengthValidator.EXACT
Adam Winer wrote:
On 5/22/07, Blake Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Winer wrote:
The Trinidad subclass of LengthValidator needs some work.
Changes I plan to make - feedback appreciated:
- The messages are copied from the LongRangeValidator, so
we say Enter a value greater than
: Generic Issue
Reporter: Blake Sullivan
Fix For: 1.0.1-incubating-core-SNAPSHOT
JspUtils.getEncoding() blindly returns the results of the enc parameter,
which could have been maliciously tampered with to include additional header
values. If this value is then used to set
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blake Sullivan updated TRINIDAD-24:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
JspUtils.getEncoding() blindly returns the results
How exactly is having the Double.MIN/MAX available on the client going
to help us? Isn't the result of an overflow a valid Double?
-- Blake Sullivan
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
ok,
we can use undefined instead of null.
So we can use the undefined to indicate that Number.MAX / -Number.MAX
301 - 388 of 388 matches
Mail list logo
