+1 on #2
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Jeanne Waldman
wrote:
> I created a JIRA issue for this.
> I initially planned to change the package from
> org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.share.io.InputStreamProvider to
> org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.share.io.InputStreamProvider
>
> Currently there i
I created a JIRA issue for this.
I initially planned to change the package from
org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.share.io.InputStreamProvider to
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.share.io.InputStreamProvider
Currently there is no "share.io" package in the API. There is no 'io'
package either.
I
+1
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
wrote:
> +1
>
> Sent from my iPod.
>
>
> On 03.03.2010, at 01:41, Jeanne Waldman wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>> I want to make sure it is ok for people if I move
>> org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.share.io.InputStreamProvider to the
>> trinid
+1
Sent from my iPod.
On 03.03.2010, at 01:41, Jeanne Waldman
wrote:
Hi there,
I want to make sure it is ok for people if I move
org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.share.io.InputStreamProvider to
the trinidad package, making InputStreamProvider a public api. It
should be very easy t
Hi there,
I want to make sure it is ok for people if I move
org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.share.io.InputStreamProvider to the
trinidad package, making InputStreamProvider a public api. It should be
very easy to do, since this interface does not use any other internal apis.
We have a cus
