[Trinidad 2.0] Updating Trinidad ResponseWriterDecorator and related classes...

2009-12-02 Thread Pavitra Subramaniam
Hi, I have provided a patch which fixes issue 1649 . The fix is to update the Trinidad ResponseWriter classes to override the new APIs added to javax.faces.context.ResponseWriter in JSF2.0. I am working on a project that uses the JSF 2.0 Aj

Re: [Trinidad 2.0] Updating Trinidad ResponseWriterDecorator and related classes...

2009-12-03 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi Pavitra, ok. Not sure I really got everything here... Once I apply the "IllegalStateException.patch", and I run the "pprDemos.jspx" (there is no ajaxPPRDemos.jspx; not in the demo, nor in the patch), I get the following JS alert() Error, when I do some ajax stuff (e.g. clicking the "partialSub

Re: [Trinidad 2.0] Updating Trinidad ResponseWriterDecorator and related classes...

2009-12-03 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
looks like attaching stuff works... (see markmail service ;-) ) Ok... FWIW, here are the Response Headers X-Powered-ByJSF/2.0 Content-Typetext/xml; charset=utf-8 Cache-Control no-cache Content-Length 9539 Server Jetty(6.1.16) Request Headers Hostlocalhost:8080 User-Agent Moz

Re: [Trinidad 2.0] Updating Trinidad ResponseWriterDecorator and related classes...

2009-12-03 Thread Pavitra Subramaniam
Just uploaded the new patch (IllegalStateException-II.patch) onto the JIRA issue "Matthias Wessendorf wrote:" On 12/3/2009 4:48 AM PT: looks like attaching stuff works... (see markmail service ;-) ) Ok... FWIW, here are the Response Header

Re: [Trinidad 2.0] Updating Trinidad ResponseWriterDecorator and related classes...

2009-12-03 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
got rid of all the HTML formating... you filed three against Trinidad ? I only saw two and the one against the RI, so is that the third one ? -Matthias On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Pavitra Subramaniam wrote: > > "Matthias Wessendorf wrote:" On 12/3/2009 4:44 AM PT: > > Hi Pavitra, > > ok. No

Re: [Trinidad 2.0] Updating Trinidad ResponseWriterDecorator and related classes...

2009-12-03 Thread Pavitra Subramaniam
Yes. :). Thanks "Matthias Wessendorf wrote:" On 12/3/2009 9:40 AM PT: got rid of all the HTML formating... you filed three against Trinidad ? I only saw two and the one against the RI, so is that the third one ? -Matthias On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Pavitra Subramaniam wrote: "Matth

Re: [Trinidad 2.0] Updating Trinidad ResponseWriterDecorator and related classes...

2009-12-09 Thread Pavitra Subramaniam
If there are no more comments I would like to request that my patch for JIRA issue 1649 be committed. Matthias, since you have looked at it can you commit it? Thanks Pavitra "Pavitra Subramaniam wrote:" On 12/3/2009 11:52 AM PT: Yes. :).

Re: [Trinidad 2.0] Updating Trinidad ResponseWriterDecorator and related classes...

2009-12-09 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
sure On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Pavitra Subramaniam wrote: > If there are no more comments I would like to request that my patch for JIRA > issue 1649 be committed. > > Matthias, since you have looked at it can you commit it? > > Thanks > Pavitra > > "Pavitra Subramaniam wrote:" On 12/3/20

Re: [Trinidad 2.0] Updating Trinidad ResponseWriterDecorator and related classes...

2009-12-10 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
committed to rev 889131: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=889131 Pavitra, are you following up on removing the ResponseWriterDecorator, in the nex time ? -Matthias On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > sure > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Pavitra