I don't know either, but thanks.
Dennis Byrne
On 3/24/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/24/07, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has the password changed or does the user just no longer exist? Maybe I
can
> kill the dir - which machine is this on?
It was just me forgett
On 3/24/07, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has the password changed or does the user just no longer exist? Maybe I can
kill the dir - which machine is this on?
It was just me forgetting the password. I removed core/api/impl from
the old continuum on port 8080, but I still don't know
Has the password changed or does the user just no longer exist? Maybe I can
kill the dir - which machine is this on?
Dennis Byrne
On 3/24/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/24/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote we move it over to the (newer) Continuum instance o
On 3/24/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It was already there, and building fine. I changed the build
definition to deploy, etc.
http://myfaces.zones.apache.org:8081/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action?projectGroupId=6
I spoke too soon... it was working, but now it's doing the same
On 3/24/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I vote we move it over to the (newer) Continuum instance on port 8081
and see if it works there.
It was already there, and building fine. I changed the build
definition to deploy, etc.
http://myfaces.zones.apache.org:8081/continuum/projectGro
On 3/24/07, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anyone help with this? It looks like velocity errors are being
generated from a checkstyle report.
I vote we move it over to the (newer) Continuum instance on port 8081
and see if it works there.
Any committer is welcome to a Continuum
Can anyone help with this? It looks like velocity errors are being
generated from a checkstyle report.
Dennis Byrne
[WARNING] Error loading report org.apache.maven.changelog.ChangeLogReport -
AbstractMethodError: canGenerateReport()
[WARNING] Error loading report
org.apache.maven.changelog.Deve
On 12/1/06, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can someone with permissions add this artifact to continuum?
org.apache.myfaces.core:myfaces-build:jar:1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
It is in the 1.2 branch, the core/build folder...
Done. Or attempted, anyway. We'll see if it works.
--
Wendy
Hi,
Can someone with permissions add this artifact to continuum?
org.apache.myfaces.core:myfaces-build:jar:1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
It is in the 1.2 branch, the core/build folder...
Thanks!
Bruno
On 02/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Online report :
http://myfaces.zones.apache.or
On 2/20/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did indeed see that (thanks for the fix) ... and Sean has already checked
> that change in (I see it in the trunk sources for Shale that I just checked
> out), so it will be in the 20060221 nightly build. That doesn't necessarily
> trans
On 2/20/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>That is a *really* good idea ... I'll be adding it to Shale's test framework>tonight. I don't see it as mutually exclusive with any of the other cleanups>we are doing to ensure that different tests do not interfere with each
>other.>>CraigYou may
>That is a *really* good idea ... I'll be adding it to Shale's test framework
>tonight. I don't see it as mutually exclusive with any of the other cleanups
>we are doing to ensure that different tests do not interfere with each
>other.
>
>Craig
You may want to look at this when you do that.
http:
On 2/20/06, John Fallows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
fyi - IIRC we tackled this problem slightly differently in the ADF Faces codebase.In an effort to fully isolate anything that might be keyed by ContextClassLoader (including FactoryFinder internal state), we created a trivial wrapper ClassLoader t
lows [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]>Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 12:07 AM>To: 'MyFaces Development'>Subject: Re: FactoryFinder.releaseFactories() - was [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: API>>fyi - IIRC we tackled this problem slightly differently in the ADF Faces
>codebase.>>In
07 AM
>To: 'MyFaces Development'
>Subject: Re: FactoryFinder.releaseFactories() - was [continuum] BUILD FAILURE:
>API
>
>fyi - IIRC we tackled this problem slightly differently in the ADF Faces
>codebase.
>
>In an effort to fully isolate anything that might be keyed by
&
fyi - IIRC we tackled this problem slightly differently in the ADF Faces codebase.In an effort to fully isolate anything that might be keyed by ContextClassLoader (including FactoryFinder internal state), we created a trivial wrapper ClassLoader to provide a unique ContextClassLoader in setUp() and
> The call is required in the setUp() method to make things work correctly on
> the *first* test, when you have the MyFaces implementation in the classpath
> of the tests. Calling it in tearDown() doesn't hurt anything, but protects
> test developers who try to subvert the JUnit test lifecycle stu
On 2/19/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Purely speaking, FactoryFinder.releaseFactories() shouldonly be necessary in tearDown() - which is where it makesthe most sense, since releasing factories is cleanup, whichis the job of tearDown().Practically speaking, it's simplest and safest to ca
Purely speaking, FactoryFinder.releaseFactories() should
only be necessary in tearDown() - which is where it makes
the most sense, since releasing factories is cleanup, which
is the job of tearDown().
Practically speaking, it's simplest and safest to call it
in both methods - which means that your
On 2/19/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I updated the Shale snapshots about half an hour ago... coincidence?>WendyThis would have happened w/ or w/out your update.The fix for this was to put FactoryFinder.releaseFactories() in setup() and in tearDown() . This setup() call is to clear
>I updated the Shale snapshots about half an hour ago... coincidence?
>Wendy
This would have happened w/ or w/out your update.
The fix for this was to put FactoryFinder.releaseFactories() in setup() and in
tearDown() . This setup() call is to clear configured Factory info from
previous tests (
Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 10:27 PM
>To: 'MyFaces Development'
>Subject: Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: API
>
>On 2/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Online report :
>> http://myfaces
On 2/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Online report :
> http://myfaces.zones.apache.org:8080/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/34/buildId/511
> Build statistics:
> State: Failed
...
> [INFO] snapshot struts:shale-test:1.0.1-SNAPSHOT: che
23 matches
Mail list logo