I'm starting to look at the code Scott posted for JSR-301. I'd like to
go ahead and start logging issues that can be quickly cleared up as soon
as the code is committed.
Can we go ahead and add a "JSR-301" component to jira?
We already have a "Portlet_Support" component, but that is for the o
Hi Stan,
as this new portlet bridge will not be lumped in to the
MyFaces-implementation, this should rather be a new project, just like
Orchestra and RCF.
Mario, Matthias, Manfred - requesting a new subproject in jira =
request on infrastructure, right?
regards,
Martin
On 9/2/07, Stan Silvert
filing an issue against infra is correct.
Manfred should be able to do that.
On 9/3/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Stan,
>
> as this new portlet bridge will not be lumped in to the
> MyFaces-implementation, this should rather be a new project, just like
> Orchestra and RCF.
Should be able to add a new jira project myself.
What I need first:
- name: "MyFaces JSR-301" sounds very technical :( Is "MyFaces
Portlet Bridge" ok?
- key: "JSR301", "PBRIDGE", ...?
- url: http://myfaces.apache.org/jsr301/ ?
- a project lead ?
--Manfred
On 9/3/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL
Hi Manfred,
yes to all suggestions - you can put me as a project lead for now,
we'll reevaluate later (obviously, the EG lead Michael Freedman will
be a good project lead when he joins the team).
regards,
Martin
On 9/3/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should be able to add a new
done.
Project: MyFaces Portlet Bridge
Key: JSR301
URL: http://myfaces.apache.org/jsr301/
Project Lead: Martin Marinschek
Notification Scheme: MyFaces notifications
Project Category: MyFaces
Also added a component "General" and a version "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT".
--Manfred
On 9/3/07, Martin Marinsch
Thanks Manfred.
Is the URL live yet? I get a 404.
Stan
Manfred Geiler wrote:
done.
Project: MyFaces Portlet Bridge
Key: JSR301
URL: http://myfaces.apache.org/jsr301/
Project Lead: Martin Marinschek
Notification Scheme: MyFaces notifications
Project Category: MyFaces
Also added a component "
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSR301
On 9/3/07, Stan Silvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Manfred.
>
> Is the URL live yet? I get a 404.
>
> Stan
>
> Manfred Geiler wrote:
> > done.
> >
> > Project: MyFaces Portlet Bridge
> > Key: JSR301
> > URL: http://myfaces.apache.org/jsr301/
>
@Matze: Stan meant the URL that the jira page references (referenced).
@Stan: No, there is nothing yet at that url as long as this
sub-project is not built together with the main site.
Well, I changed the URL to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSR301 which does not make more
sense but might
It's probably too late to do anything about it, but JSR301 seems like
a poor name for a few reasons. First, it's not obvious to which
apache project the JSR301 issue key belongs, nor is it clear to the
uniformed what JSR301 stands for. It'd be the same as naming MyFaces
JSR127. Second, there'
I agree on this. I think we were talking about the subproject being
named jsf-portlet-bridge or portlet bridge. Should the Jira issues list
be the same? Also, presumably this project will cover future JSR's on
this same API.
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
It's probably too late to do anything a
You are right, but:
- many Jira-Keys of Apache sub projects do not correspond to their
"umbrella" project: TOMAHAWK, TRINIDAD, ...
- of course their could be another Apache project implementing JSR301,
but the same problem applies to the long name: if we name the sub
project "Apache JSF Portlet Bri
Mike,
[offtopic]
are you cayenne guys passing the TCK already ?
[/offtopic]
On 9/5/07, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's probably too late to do anything about it, but JSR301 seems like
> a poor name for a few reasons. First, it's not obvious to which
> apache project the JSR3
I'm not sure. I haven't been following the JPA implementation for
Cayenne closely.
On 9/5/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike,
>
> [offtopic]
> are you cayenne guys passing the TCK already ?
> [/offtopic]
>
> On 9/5/07, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's p
14 matches
Mail list logo