On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Bernd Bohmann
bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote:
Hello,
why we need the @author tag?
I don't like code owner ship.
well, some do. I am fine without. In fact a lot of Apache project do so, since
there is no code-ownership. SVN has still all the information
Hey,
I'm not a big fan of code ownership either, but the proposal was just to
remove the redundant stuff. If there is a consensus about removing the
@author tag too, that's fine with me. Removing all this stuff at once is
easier than having multiple runs where we remove one thing at a time.
I would also get rid of the author tags too. I guess that in many cases
they are not correct anyway as files are constantly changed.
Michael
Am 11.08.2010 08:22, schrieb Matthias Wessendorf:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Bernd Bohmann
bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote:
Hello,
why we need
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel
jankeesvanan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I'm not a big fan of code ownership either, but the proposal was just to
remove the redundant stuff. If there is a consensus about removing the
@author tag too, that's fine with me. Removing all this
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Michael Kurz michi.k...@gmx.at wrote:
I would also get rid of the author tags too. I guess that in many cases they
are not correct anyway as files are constantly changed.
exactly, and still svn (blame) knows everything... Original committer
and who introduced
I'd like to keep the @author tags. Isn't the spirit of the meritocracy involved
with making authors visible? Shouldn't personal merit for a project be made
visible in the code? I think it's great to see Manfred Geiler as the orginal
author of most MyFaces parts. Many people download the source
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Ganesh gan...@j4fry.org wrote:
I'd like to keep the @author tags. Isn't the spirit of the meritocracy
involved with making authors visible?
Actually not...
There are a ton of discussions on this in the archives.
Fact: there is no code ownership...
Shouldn't
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Ganesh gan...@j4fry.org wrote:
I'd like to keep the @author tags. Isn't the spirit of the meritocracy
involved with making authors visible?
Actually not...
There are a ton of
Hi guys,
+1 on removing all this stuff.
Frankly I always added or changed the headers to include author and version
information, but only because I read it in the MyFaces developer notes [1]
and the referenced Struts svn guide [2] in the wiki.
@Jan-Kees: I don't really understand what you mean
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
+1 on removing all this stuff.
Frankly I always added or changed the headers to include author and version
information, but only because I read it in the MyFaces developer notes [1]
and the referenced
there are other social issues dealing with collaborative
development, but the Board is concerned about the legal ramifications
around the use of author tags
OK, I see the point.
+1 of removing this, the info is in svn anyway, why duplicate it?
Werner
Am 09.08.10 21:43, schrieb Jan-Kees van Andel:
Hi,
What do you guys think about pruning the SVN keywords in the source files?
Matthias pointed out a nice example of an issue you run into with this
stuff.
1 Not
Hi,
The issue has been filed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2871
About the guidelines Michael referred to:
- I suggest to completely get rid of all SVN related stuff.
- I think it's ok to keep the @author tags.
- Also the @since tags seem useful to me.
In other words, drop all
Hi
Could you provide an explicit example about how the header of java files
should be?
best regards,
Leonardo
Hi,
Sure. For example, take a look at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk/api/src/main/java/javax/faces/FacesException.java
If we remove the SVN stuff, we'll end up with this JavaDoc comment:
/**
* see Javadoc of a href=
Hello,
why we need the @author tag?
I don't like code owner ship.
Does your request mean we don't allow the svn:keywords=Date Author Id
Revision HeadURL
in the Subversion config file?
Regards
Bernd
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Jan-Kees van Andel
jankeesvanan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
What do you guys think about pruning the SVN keywords in the source files?
Matthias pointed out a nice example of an issue you run into with this
stuff.
1 Not everybody has (the same) svn:keywords on every file.
2 When 1, it will get out of sync.
3 Unreadable version numbers are pretty
+1
these are the reasons why you won't find such information in the extensions
projects.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2010/8/9 Jan-Kees van Andel
+1 because it's most times broken anyway ;)
LieGrue,
strub
From: Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
Sent: Mon, August 9, 2010 11:22:34 PM
Subject: Re: Proposal to stop using SVN Keywords - (was: MyFaces shipping
with
JBoss AS6?)
+1
these are
+1 as keeping information where it belongs (in the SVN) is basically a
good idea. General guidelines about what should be in the header of a
file might be useful.
regards
Michael
Am 09.08.2010 23:41, schrieb Mark Struberg:
+1 because it's most times broken anyway ;)
LieGrue,
strub
From:
20 matches
Mail list logo
