Hi!
Using Apache MyFaces Fusion I've created a new example app: Ballot
A tool to help make what I call dynamic votes.
BTW: Even if there would have such a tool already there, I wanted to
create another example for fusion.
It is not meant to replace the voting on the ML, its just to distill
those
Btw, this poll will not be anonymous, so that everyone can be sure that
I don't manipulate the data.
A (to be create) page will allow you to have a look at the vote of each
voter.
If you don't mind
Hi!
Using Apache MyFaces Fusion I've created a new example app: Ballot
A tool to help make
Another question is, if I should allow you to vote for each name, or if
I should force you to cast your vote for e.g. 5 names only.
Then changing the available vote selections should be 0 1 2 3 4 5, no?
Hi!
Using Apache MyFaces Fusion I've created a new example app: Ballot
A tool to help make
Top 5
On 3/3/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another question is, if I should allow you to vote for each name, or if
I should force you to cast your vote for e.g. 5 names only.
Then changing the available vote selections should be 0 1 2 3 4 5, no?
Hi!
Using Apache MyFaces
Hello Dennis,
why we should look at the RI?
Can we use this Interface
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/api/org/apache/AnnotationProcessor.html?
Why you don't like to import javax.annotation. in the code. If the
annotation are missing in the container the annotations in the managed
On 3/3/07, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Dennis,
why we should look at the RI?
I'd prefer doing things that is compatible with them. This is easier on the
users and it makes passing TCK smoother.
Can we use this Interface
Thanks Dennis!
On 3/2/07, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I removed it from the code generator. Some of the renderers still look for
the 'align' attribute but I'll get to that later.
Thanks,
Dennis Byrne
On 3/2/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see that the datafld,
Hello Dennis,
I think the interface has nothing to do with tomcat. Would the interface
meet your requirements?
If yes, I would suggest following:
Create a AnnotationProcessorFactory which return as default an
AnnotationProcessor who is a copy of the tomcat
DefaultAnnotationProcessor(the
OK, I think the RI also recently added the META-INF/services
technique. But I don't know how reliable this sun blog entry is:
http://tinyurl.com/yrrjs2
Best wishes,
Paul
On 3/2/07, Mathias Brökelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The RI uses two ways to lookup the implementation of the vendor
I added a comment
http://blogs.sun.com/rlubke/entry/jsf_ri_1_2_and#comment-1172947192023 .
Two more ideas. Ryan mentions applications using facelets, jsf 1.2 and
servlet 2.4. Unless I'm missing something, there's one reason to use
annotation.getName().equals(javax.annotation.PostConstruct)
Just added an implementation of the annotation handling based on the
tomcat implementation.
Bernd
Dennis Byrne wrote:
I added a comment
http://blogs.sun.com/rlubke/entry/jsf_ri_1_2_and#comment-1172947192023 .
Two more ideas. Ryan mentions applications using facelets, jsf 1.2 and
servlet
Are you under the impression that our 1.2 branch didn't already handle
@PostConstruct and @PreDestroy? Looks like the left hand doesn't know what
the right hand is doing here.
Dennis Byrne
On 3/3/07, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just added an implementation of the annotation
??? Yes, I know it.
Dennis Byrne wrote:
Are you under the impression that our 1.2 branch didn't already handle
@PostConstruct and @PreDestroy? Looks like the left hand doesn't know what
the right hand is doing here.
Dennis Byrne
On 3/3/07, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just added
Mathias, me and Paul were discussing the future of this feature. For the
most part we were in agreement. I appreciate your input, but it did not
gain traction w/ anyone. You then went ahead and committed a bunch of code.
IMO, you have not been a good team member today Bernd. Please assign
Sorry,
I ask you if it's ok to add the code.
I get no answer then I asume it's ok to add my idea.
It's only a different possible implementation.
If you don't like it you can remove it.
Is anything wrong with the code?
Bernd
Dennis Byrne wrote:
Mathias, me and Paul were discussing the future
Just revert my commit
Dennis Byrne wrote:
Mathias, me and Paul were discussing the future of this feature. For the
most part we were in agreement. I appreciate your input, but it did not
gain traction w/ anyone. You then went ahead and committed a bunch of
code.
IMO, you have not been a
No code in myfaces (or any other apache project) is owned by someone.
That is important for a healthy and moving community. Bernds
submission was a little bit fast but sometimes a complex issue is
better understand if we can look at the code - no matter if that is
the solution we finally have.
I
I don't hold anything against you. Ultimately I feel like this is a
lose-lose situation for MyFaces because where things stand now, you are
likely to feel as though your efforts on that branch are not appreciated.
They are.
Ryan has responded ...
On 3/3/07, Mathias Brökelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No code in myfaces (or any other apache project) is owned by someone.
That is important for a healthy and moving community. Bernds
submission was a little bit fast but sometimes a complex issue is
better understand if we can look at the
Hello Dennis,
should i readd the other possible implementation? :-)
But I should write my own TestCases.
I think it should be possible to use the PostConstruct and PreDestroy
Annotations with tomcat 5.5 and facelets. When a InitialContext is
available we should try resource injection, too.
I forwarded the thread to Ed, as neither Adam, Craig, Kito or Manfred
had anything to say on this... or do they?
There is an alternative workaround: I checked it in RendererUtils
yesterday - for you to review. However, I think it makes the value
lookup code in the renderer very complicated. It
my +1 for promoting this comp up to tomahawk. It's very useful, and I
use it in several production level apps. I have never had any issues
with its javascript either, but I don't have time to try to reproduce
the bug.
regards,
Martin
On 3/2/07, Jeff Bischoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does that
I'm certainly happy to do the interview - but whoever wants to join in
is very welcome. We might also not forget about Mario as an option for
doing the interview, he has been very active in the last year with new
ideas for MyFaces as well... Well, it's hard to decide who is supposed
to do an
Bernd Bohmann wrote:
The AnnotationProcessor/InjectionProvider are very similar. I don't like
to define a new myfaces Interface for this use case. I would prefer the
org.apache.AnnotationProcessor because is not tomcat specific and an
apache implementation. Until we find a final solution we
Unfortunately, I don't see a way to do non proprietary
annotation/injection processing, since the component that has to do it
(JSP or JSF) cannot possibly get the configuration (which could define
overrides, etc). Since I suppose you'll want to support all containers,
that's a problem. (It would
Affects Versions: 1.1.3, 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT, 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: Mike Kienenberger
Priority: Critical
The jslistener.jsf example no longer works. Not sure when it broke.
http://www.irian.at/myfaces/jslistener.jsf
http://example.irian.at/example-simple-20070303
Came across this today -- For facelets and JSF RI 1.2, you have to
manually add the following to your form in order for an action to be
triggered by a navigationMenuItem enclosed in a jscookMenu component.
input type=hidden name=jscook_action /
Does anyone know if this is fixed in the latest
There were a few of us that wanted to push back on the WebTier EG around
annotation support over the fact that there wasn't a clear API
provided-- yet oddly enough, everyone is ending up with basically the
same API :-)
My hope is that the WebBeans JSR can bring some solidarity around this
28 matches
Mail list logo
