[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497354
]
Cagatay Civici commented on TOMAHAWK-996:
-
Joost, it's very easy to create patches, if you're using an svn
Hi *,
anyone running Tomahawk with MyFaces 12 and Tomcat 6 successfully?
I have created the intellij project with the -Djsf=12 parameter, which
is working fine for the creation, but no luck for running the whole
thing.
As Bruno has written, the jetty plugin works fine and starts.
Anyone
Hi,
I just want to discuss an issue I've faced lately.
When a user makes a request with the request header accept : text/* ,
response writer cannot be created because text/* is not supported.
selectContentType method of HtmlRendererUtils first checks the request
header map for accept key and
Hi!
I'd like to make the following two enhancements to the tomahawk
datatable/column:
1) add a new attribute groupByValue to the column
This allows to configure a valueBinding to be used as value to check if
there is a group change instead of scanning the children.
The old behavior still works,
No, sounds good to me.
regards,
Martin
On 5/21/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I'd like to make the following two enhancements to the tomahawk
datatable/column:
1) add a new attribute groupByValue to the column
This allows to configure a valueBinding to be used as value to
+1
My apps are running with the jars from the staging repository without
any problems.
Regards,
Volker
2007/5/20, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I would like to release Tobago 1.0.11,
This release contains over 50 changes.
For a detail list please consult the release notes:
+1, if the following 2 minor issues are resolved
- Markup strong for tc:out doesn't work in Speyside (I will check in
the necessary change in the trunk; for the release see the attached
patch file)
- If you switch to the Richmond theme in the address book demo, you will
get superfluous scroll
Hi,
i don't think either of suggestions are right.
Sugesstion 1 has disadvatage:
if you change one property of children in group, which is not defined as
groupByValue or
taken in account when computing value of checking value,
you don't get whole group as changed.
Suggestion 2 has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497422
]
Ricardo T. commented on TOBAGO-402:
---
Possibility to sort by more than 1 column
eg.: A sheet with columns:
Hi Zdenek,
ad 1 - that's exactly what Mario wants to do - he wants to make sure
that the group doesn't change if only an attribute, but not the id
changes.
ad 2 - why does sorting have anything to do with the grouping functionality?
regards,
Martin
On 5/21/07, Zdeněk Sochor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
Sugesstion 1 has disadvatage:
if you change one property of children in group, which is not defined
as groupByValue or
taken in account when computing value of checking value,
you don't get whole group as changed.
Notice, this change is backward compatible, so if you do NOT use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497424
]
Volker Weber commented on TOBAGO-402:
-
You can get what you want if you click first on 'Last Name' and then on
some groupBy enhancements for datatable
---
Key: TOMAHAWK-1004
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1004
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Extended
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497433
]
Ricardo T. commented on TOBAGO-402:
---
Using this Jira for example:
If i click on Assignee, i get order by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cagatay Civici resolved TOMAHAWK-784.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.6-SNAPSHOT
Onclick events will be
Mario,
I am already thinking of places to use the enhancements.
+1 - add a new attribute groupByValue to the column
+1 - use objects instead of StringBuffer to create the compare string
Paul Spencer
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
I'd like to make the following two enhancements to the tomahawk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mario Ivankovits resolved TOMAHAWK-1004.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.6-SNAPSHOT
some groupBy
Following up to dev list...
Looks like the Tomahawk maven build is failing from continuum with:
Missing:
--
1) javax.servlet.jsp:jsp-api:jar:1.2.0
Wendy, do you know if we have to manually install that jar on the zone, or
is something being built out of sequence ?
On 5/21/07, Grant
ChildPropertyTreeModel state is not serializable: List.subList()
-
Key: TRINIDAD-27
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-27
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Winer resolved TRINIDAD-27.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.0.1-incubating-core-SNAPSHOT
Fixed - we now make a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497506
]
Volker Weber commented on TOBAGO-402:
-
This is(should) what you get in tobago shhet if you click first on
Split shorthand CSS properties to allow for better inheritance
--
Key: TOBAGO-405
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-405
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type: Task
On May 21, 2007, at 4:56 AM, Bruno Aranda wrote:
Hi, I haven't tried directly since a while as I am always using jetty,
but what is the exception you get?
The TCK was run in geronimo with tomcat, so in theory everything
should work correctly,
The annotation handling in geronimo's tomcat is
I'm trying to understand why the nightly builds are failing. It looks like
the mrmaven user on the zone has a cron job called nightly-assembly.py,
which does:
#!/opt/python-2.4.1/bin/python
import continuum
import sys
continuum = continuum.Continuum( http://localhost:8000; )
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497522
]
Adam Winer commented on TRINIDAD-24:
Fixed. Having problems with JIRA, so can't update the status.
I'm having a series of problems with the new JIRA TRINIDAD
group. I can't change the status of
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-24,
and I've not been able to assign any of the issues.
Should I be filing infrastructure bugs?
-- Adam
I mailed Martin on that already, on the myfaces-dev list.
Manfred, aren't you also a JIRA-Super-Admin ?
-M
On 5/21/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a series of problems with the new JIRA TRINIDAD
group. I can't change the status of
Hi, I have tried to deploy the examples in tomcat 6 and I don't see
any issue (a part from the existing bugs!)
If you want to check it, add this section in the examples POM, that
configures cargo to start tomcat with the examples:
profile
idtomcat/id
build
+1 for 1.2.
-1 for 2.0.
I see no advantage to using major version numbers which differ from
the spec. I see the disadvantage of confusion.
Also, Manfred, you can have a -1 vote on this issue, but not a veto.
Vetos only apply to code changes; they do not apply to procedural
issues such as
When getting the converter of an array of type String, an exception is thrown
-
Key: MYFACES-1636
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1636
Project: MyFaces
+1 for 1.2
-1 for 2.0
I do agree that using 2.0 may cause confusion, as unlike what happens
with tomcat, there will be a future version 2.0 of the spec when
myfaces 2.0 is there already. People, unaware of the versioning
procedure of the myfaces project, will go and fetch this version
thinking
ClassCastException in UIComponentClassicTagBase.createVerbatimComponent
---
Key: MYFACES-1637
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1637
Project: MyFaces Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda resolved MYFACES-1636.
---
Resolution: Fixed
When getting the converter of an array of type String, an exception is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda resolved MYFACES-1637.
---
Resolution: Fixed
ClassCastException in UIComponentClassicTagBase.createVerbatimComponent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda updated MYFACES-1478:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
Status: Resolved (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda resolved MYFACES-1564.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Submitted Values get lost in case conversion/validation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda resolved MYFACES-1485.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
Implement JSR-252 core tag:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda resolved MYFACES-1434.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
All attributes in tags must be of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda resolved MYFACES-1201.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
JSR-252 Issue #4: Added
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497564
]
Bruno Aranda commented on MYFACES-1563:
---
Hi, you were trying this when the implementation was not yet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda resolved MYFACES-1217.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
Assignee: Bruno Aranda
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda resolved MYFACES-1264.
---
Resolution: Fixed
JSR-252 Issue #108: JSF in Java EE containers must validate the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497567
]
Bruno Aranda commented on MYFACES-1218:
---
This issue is RI specific. Is this appliable to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda resolved MYFACES-1327.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Hi, what is the state of this?
Cheers,
Bruno
Make example webapp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda reopened MYFACES-1327:
---
I have resolved it instead of just writing a comment :-)
Make example webapp with 1.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda resolved MYFACES-1232.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
This issue is RI specific, right?
JSR-252 Issue #72: Improve XHTML
There will always be an impedence mismatch here because MyFaces no longer
represents the Spec but also various component projects. So I see
Manfred/Matze's point.
This is why I have always advocated letting the Component initiatives reign
alone in terms of their version order, release frequency
I thought we were simply discussing MyFaces Core.
Let me clarify my vote:
+1 1.2 MyFaces Core for JSF 1.2.
-1 2.0 MyFaces Core for JSF 1.2.
Don't care for Tomahawk/Trinidad/Tobago. These are no longer
tightly-coupled to a specific MyFaces core release, and should use
whatever versions make
- If Accept is just text/*, defaulting to text/html is appropriate.
Cool, I'll open a issue and fix it then.
- In JSF 1.1, the page directive comes along too late to
use as another source of a content type, but in JSF 1.2, I think
we could take advantage of it.
Yes, I think we really
It is a discussion about the core - I am only trying to establish WHY there
are two schools of thought on this - refer to Manfred's post to this thread
on May 18th.
Cheers,
Z.
On 5/21/07, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought we were simply discussing MyFaces Core.
Let me
Hi!
At the moment the JavaScript function which are starting
with oam (e.g. oamSetHiddenInput, oamSubmit, ...)
are rendered at the first commandLink or commandButton.
Is there a special reason for not having those in, for instance
commons.js
The PPR JavaScript for instance uses the
Do not render id and name attributes in links, if id is not specified
-
Key: MYFACES-1638
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1638
Project: MyFaces Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda resolved MYFACES-1638.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Following the general notes on encoding:
Some DTDs hold Sun Microsystems copyrights.
Key: MYFACES-1639
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1639
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Task
Components: General
Content after the view tag incorrectly written to the response
--
Key: MYFACES-1640
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1640
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497627
]
Grant Smith commented on MYFACES-1639:
--
I'm omitting the comments in these files, as they may be construed as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda resolved MYFACES-1640.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Content after the view tag incorrectly written to the response
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497687
]
Paul McMahan commented on MYFACES-1639:
---
the current12 branch also contains the DTDs. do you think we
58 matches
Mail list logo
