Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
Hi
I have a design question. I'm working on generate component tag
classes using velocity.
In this part it is common to found some situations when you need
utility methods. There are several methods
to do this:
1) Implementing this methods on a java class, and use
I totally agree with Andrew, that these *regular* build issues are annoying.
So... why is the continuum server almost always saying
ContinuumBuildCancelledException ?
That doesn't make sense to me? Is the used version (totally) instable ?
-M
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Thanks Matt, I seen that gray area, was an error, that area must be green :)
Matthias and Bruno, for you I can provide the original illustrator file of
the logo.
You can take this file and go to a local t-shirt printer. ;)
I think is a good idea to have a place on the MyFaces site (or on
Hello Matthias,
here is the top output from myfaces.zones.apache.org:
load averages: 19.19, 23.48, 25.05
07:19:32
35 processes: 32 sleeping, 2 running, 1 on cpu
CPU states: 0.0% idle, 98.9% user, 1.1% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% swap
Memory: 16G real, 2456M free, 7337M swap in use, 30G swap
Hey Börnd,
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Matthias,
here is the top output from myfaces.zones.apache.org:
load averages: 19.19, 23.48, 25.05
07:19:32
35 processes: 32 sleeping, 2 running, 1 on cpu
CPU states: 0.0% idle, 98.9% user,
data lost in dataList when conversion error is thrown
-
Key: TOMAHAWK-1225
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1225
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Bug
Make jslibDebug a configurable option
-
Key: TRINIDAD-1039
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1039
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Paul Mander
It
... with serialize in state disabled.
I've create a small test case which shows that the attributes map is
just copied over into the state. Which means that each and every
Component shares exactly the same map. Any change to this map will be
reflected in ALL saved states.
Correct would be to
PPRPanelGroup event reconnecting broken when there are multiple forms
-
Key: TOMAHAWK-1227
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1227
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Hi,
Mario Ivankovits napsal(a):
... with serialize in state disabled.
I've create a small test case which shows that the attributes map is
just copied over into the state. Which means that each and every
Component shares exactly the same map. Any change to this map will be
reflected in ALL
Hi!
It's because the wrong constructor in api's _ComponentAttributesMap
class, it's assigning the map directly:
So we do agree that this needs to be fixed? Then I'll do so ...
Ciao,
Mario
Sochor Zdeněk schrieb:
Hi,
Mario Ivankovits napsal(a):
... with serialize in state disabled.
I've create a small test case which shows that the attributes map is
just copied over into the state. Which means that each and every
Component shares exactly the same map. Any change to this map
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585057#action_12585057
]
Simon Kitching commented on MYFACES-1820:
-
Actually, this problem exists for
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a):
Sochor Zdeněk schrieb:
Hi,
Mario Ivankovits napsal(a):
... with serialize in state disabled.
I've create a small test case which shows that the attributes map is
just copied over into the state. Which means that each and every
Component shares
JSP regular exceptions causes vlack page output
---
Key: MYFACES-1848
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1848
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.2.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585132#action_12585132
]
Davide Bonicelli commented on TRINIDAD-1030:
Scott,
when I say
Nested PPRPanelGroups don't render their children on a PPR request
--
Key: TOMAHAWK-1228
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1228
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Is the MyfacesBuilderPlugin completely separate from the Trinidad Maven
Plugins?
~~~
Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action
http://www.virtua.com/ http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting,
training, and mentoring
From: Gary VanMatre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 11:16 AM
To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'MyFaces Development'
Cc: Kito D. Mann
Subject: RE: JSF 2.0 component set
From: Kito D. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just want to add that when we were talking
Hi Bernd,
Thanks for the reply, see below:
On 02/04/2008, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've also just removed any Java compliation support from the plugin
since I couldn't see any advantage of duplicating this with the
maven-compiler-plugin. Can you see any problems with
FYI ... the JSR 301 -- bridge allows such subsystems to avoid this issue
because it sets a request attribute one can check to determine if you
are running in a portlet environment. The subsystem can check whether
this attribute is set/exists using the ExternalContext prior to making
any
PDF Exporter
Key: TOMAHAWK-1229
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1229
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: Hazem Saleh
Fix
Hello Mark,
comments inline.
Mark Hobson schrieb:
Hi Bernd,
1) Do you use extra source roots? I'm tempted to remove this
parameter since it tends to go against the standard of using the
project's current source roots.
Yes, I need this parameter. We unpack a source artifact and
Plus, for containers like Orchestra which are not necessarily tied to a
specific bridge implementation, it would allow them to work in
environments with older bridges.
Scott
Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Mike... True, although I did some timing and instanceof's (at least
in JDK 1.5) seemed to be on
Mike... True, although I did some timing and instanceof's (at least in
JDK 1.5) seemed to be on order of magnitudes faster then pulling a
request attribute off of the attribute map. At least on the server I
was testing. Secondly, Configurators sometimes run prior to the bridge
for servlets
The example in the tag documentation for tr:train needs to be updated for
Trinidad. It refers to af:train, af:commandNavigationItem,
org.apache.myfaces.adf.model.ProcessMenuModel and
org.apache.myfaces.adf.model.ProcessUtils
I foresee an exact copy of the functionality outlined by shale-test,
only with portlet mock objects. The reason it's enticing to move it
in-house is that implementations of the externalcontext depend a lot on
JSF itself. Enhancements/bug fixes could parallel those in faces and the
bridge.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585239#action_12585239
]
Brian Kates commented on MYFACES-1834:
--
We're in the process of migrating from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585251#action_12585251
]
Brian Kates commented on MYFACES-1834:
--
I also disagree with the priority on this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585268#action_12585268
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-1796:
-
Yes, the problem presented is clear.
sev-en is a new jsf-extension.
sev-en allows jsf validation with annotations!
some central features:
- cross-component validation (including cross-entity validation)
- support for jpa based validation
- zero configuration
- extensible (e.g. custom annotations)
you will find some previews
-Original Message-
From: Scott O'Bryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:21 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Cc: 'Gary VanMatre'
Subject: Re: JSF 2.0 component set
I foresee an exact copy of the functionality outlined by shale-test,
only with portlet mock
Kito - ShaleTest is already JSF 1.2
Scott
Kito D. Mann wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Scott O'Bryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:21 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Cc: 'Gary VanMatre'
Subject: Re: JSF 2.0 component set
I foresee an exact copy of the
I have not seen the specifics of this project, but if you're using
velocity, you should be able to have the code which initializes
velocity automatically populate something like $utils instead of doing
it in the velocity template language.
I also think you're better off NOT putting
I don't really see why the physical location affects the ability to fix bugs
or do enhancements in parallel, unless it depends on some common
implementation classes. Or, are you talking more about releases?
Well releases are part of it. I was meerly bringing up that the Bridge
(even
javascript on button should be removed or configurable by user
--
Key: MYFACES-1849
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1849
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have not seen the specifics of this project, but if you're using
velocity, you should be able to have the code which initializes
velocity automatically populate something like $utils instead of doing
it in the
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Kito D. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the MyfacesBuilderPlugin completely separate from the Trinidad Maven
Plugins?
Actually is a branch developed inside build-tools. There is no official vote
yet about if this plugin will be used on trinidad, since
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The drawback
is that creates a log file on the project folder (I'm not found how to
output the log on the screen yet!).
Have you looked at this page?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585354#action_12585354
]
Richard Yee commented on TRINIDAD-943:
--
I have tried to handle timeouts with a
Thanks for the explanation, Leonardo. I'm guessing that the Trinidad plugin
isn't generic enough to be used outside of Trinidad?
~~~
Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action
http://www.virtua.com/ http://www.virtua.com -
Yeah, Craig was doing that just before one of the apache conferences - the one
in Austin. We had a co-presentation. He was the primary and instead of
putting together the slides, he was working on the 1.2 mock objects. Scott,
you know that I'm *not* the kind of guy that is good with public
-- Original message --
From: Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't really see why the physical location affects the ability to fix bugs
or do enhancements in parallel, unless it depends on some common
implementation classes. Or, are you talking more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585383#action_12585383
]
Mohamed Thowbick commented on MYFACES-1693:
---
I am trying to use myfaces-1.2.2
44 matches
Mail list logo
