Allow String converters
---
Key: TRINIDAD-1117
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1117
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Improvement
Environment: JSF 1.2 RI, Trinidad 1.2.8
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Koci updated TRINIDAD-1117:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Allow String converters
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12604500#action_12604500
]
Jorge Rodríguez Pedrianes commented on TOMAHAWK-1194:
-
Hello
Wrong rendering read only inputs in tables
--
Key: TRINIDAD-1118
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1118
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Skinning
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I want to know if any developer has a reason to avoid render this id, and
if
no objections I'll commit this change in 72 hours (doing this
s:inputSuggestAjax and s:tableSuggestAjax could work with trinidad
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to know if any developer has a reason to avoid render
this id, and if
no objections I'll commit this change in 72 hours (doing this
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to know if any developer has a reason to avoid render
this
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
why not getElementsByName[0] ?
Well, in general document.getElementById is both faster and more elegant.
So in this case, rendering this component with id=clientId seems reasonable.
Hmm..but it is possible that there are multiple view state fields in
the page, one per form.
Mario Ivankovits schrieb:
Hi!
why not getElementsByName[0] ?
Well, in general document.getElementById is both faster and more
elegant.
So in this case, rendering this component with id=clientId seems
reasonable.
Hmm..but it is possible that there are multiple view state
Hi!
And also ensure that every ViewState will be replaced and not only the
first [0] one.
When you do have multiple JSF forms (which is valid) each ViewState
needs to be replaced.
Yes, but only when they came from the same view!
I don't know much about JSF portal bridge stuff. Can this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12604543#action_12604543
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on TRINIDAD-1117:
--
thanks!
Looks right to me.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthias Weßendorf updated TRINIDAD-1117:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.9-core
Hi,
thanks for the patches.
I already committed 1117 and will take a look at the other one.
-M
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Martin Kočí [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
can anybody review patchs for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1117
and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Omar Elprince updated TRINIDAD-917:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
tr:form defaultCommand does no partial triggering
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12604619#action_12604619
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on TRINIDAD-917:
-
I don't see a patch...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthias Weßendorf updated TRINIDAD-917:
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
tr:form defaultCommand does no partial
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Darren updated TRINIDAD-917:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
tr:form defaultCommand does no partial triggering
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthias Weßendorf updated TRINIDAD-917:
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
tr:form defaultCommand does no partial
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12604638#action_12604638
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on TOMAHAWK-1194:
--
mmm I see your intention, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Freedman updated PORTLETBRIDGE-36:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Update PortletBridge to latest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Freedman reopened PORTLETBRIDGE-36:
---
Set wrong status.
Update PortletBridge to latest draft (revision 14)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Freedman resolved PORTLETBRIDGE-36.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Just changing status from closed to resolved.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-34?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Freedman updated PORTLETBRIDGE-34:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
1.0.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Freedman resolved PORTLETBRIDGE-10.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
Fixed by checkin of
Update messages for validators and converters
-
Key: TRINIDAD-1119
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1119
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Matthias
Hi,
I just noticed this:
http://live.eclipse.org/node/483
Greetings,
Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Hi,
perhaps someone of you knows a workaround for this:
Take this JSP code:
h:inputText value=#{bean.number}
f:convertNumber /
/h:inputText
For instance, when the entered value is 333.111 the actual stored
value is 333.11099899955582804977893829345703125
I think the mathematic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12604734#action_12604734
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on TOMAHAWK-1157:
--
This problem is a little bit
Hi!
I ignore what happens when use multiple jsf portlets in the same page,
or when the page is using multiple forms on the same page (normal
submits should work on both environmets, but ajaxified components?).
With I ignore you mean you will not replace the ViewState for each
form having a
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I ignore what happens when use multiple jsf portlets in the same page,
or when the page is using multiple forms on the same page (normal
submits should work on both environmets, but ajaxified components?).
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BigDecimal converter could solve this problem, maybe this value is converted
as double or float as is.
ok, the demo was a little bit to simple.
We want currency formatting etc. Means what the convertNumber actually does.
34 matches
Mail list logo
