[ExtVal] jsr 303 integration

2009-02-26 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hello, this week i started with the integration of jsr 303. the good news: the base mechanism is already working (without changing existing api's) the very good news: it's working with the existing jsf versions (as you can see in the jsr 303 public draft it normally requires some adjustments)

Re: [ExtVal] jsr 303 integration

2009-02-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: hello, this week i started with the integration of jsr 303. the good news: the base mechanism is already working (without changing existing api's) the very good news: it's working with the existing jsf

Re: [ExtVal] jsr 303 integration

2009-02-26 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hello matthias, yes - the license of the api (and also of hibernate validator v4 as ri impl.) is asl 2.0 anyway, you can use every impl.! currently just the api of the spec. is required. the current maven dep. of this module is: ... groupIdjavax.validation/groupId

Re: [ExtVal] jsr 303 integration

2009-02-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: hello matthias, yes - the license of the api (and also of hibernate validator v4 as ri impl.) is asl 2.0 anyway, you can use every impl.! currently just the api of the spec. is yes, I just wanted to say, IF

Re: [ExtVal] jsr 303 integration

2009-02-26 Thread Gerhard Petracek
ok i just added the details to ensure that there are no misunderstandings. - +1 regards, gerhard 2009/2/26 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: hello matthias, yes - the license of the api (and also

Re: [ExtVal] jsr 303 integration

2009-02-26 Thread Hazem Saleh
Since there are Apache license compatible implementations, +1 for the adapter approach. On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: ok i just added the details to ensure that there are no misunderstandings. - +1 regards, gerhard 2009/2/26

Re: MyFaces 2.0 development going forward

2009-02-26 Thread Simon Lessard
Hi Matthias, I guess that's a fair point about alpha release, I'll try to think of some good milestone. ~ Simon On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote: Hi On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Simon Lessard simon.lessar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Michael,

Re: Re: MyFaces 2.0 development going forward

2009-02-26 Thread jankeesvanandel
I'm currently working on the annotation processing stuff (@ManagedBean, @ManagedProperty...). Already made a first attempt for the managed beans, but there is still some work to do (converters, components, event listeners, etc). I hope I can apply the same logic for those other components

Re: Re: MyFaces 2.0 development going forward

2009-02-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
About Shale-test, is it right to use Shale classes in MyFaces Core? Of course it's just the unit tests, but in some way it's still a cyclic dependency which is usually a bad thing... but you don't relay on the testing framework for runtime. So, yes using shale to fire the unit tests is valid.

Re: MyFaces 2.0 development going forward

2009-02-26 Thread Michael Concini
Thanks for the responses so far. Comments in-line (in blue text). Simon Lessard wrote: Hi Matthias, I guess that's a fair point about alpha release, I'll try to think of some good milestone. ~ Simon On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org

Re: MyFaces 2.0 development going forward

2009-02-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Not sure what you mean by combing a committer.  As far as the TCK is whoops. Typo... becoming :-) concerned though, we will have immediate access to the TCK at IBM once Sun releases it.  We'd be happy to run any alpha, beta and eventually final releases of MyFaces 2.0 through the tck and

Re: MyFaces 2.0 development going forward

2009-02-26 Thread Michael Concini
Good point about the size of the facelets work. Simon, is there part of the facelets work that we could pick up for you guys? We're looking to help out where our efforts would be most useful instead of just grabbing random issues to work on. I agree for the most part about your proposed

Re: MyFaces 2.0 development going forward

2009-02-26 Thread Simon Lessard
Hi Micheal, Help on Facelets would be most welcome, it's quite big and not a code base I know that much. I can see 6 main tasks to that integration, 4 required and 2 nice to have: 1. Relink the classes to JSF 2.0 FaceletContext and other Facelets API from myfaces-api. *100%* done. 2.

Re: MyFaces 2.0 development going forward

2009-02-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Simon, can you add that content to a wiki ? -Matthias On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Simon Lessard simon.lessar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Micheal, Help on Facelets would be most welcome, it's quite big and not a code base I know that much. I can see 6 main tasks to that integration, 4

Re: MyFaces 2.0 development going forward

2009-02-26 Thread Michael Concini
I'll have to check on what the deal is with the tck results. I'm not sure what our current license conditions are with Sun (not my area of expertise). I'll let you know what I find out from our legal team. Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Not sure what you mean by combing a committer. As far as

Re: MyFaces 2.0 development going forward

2009-02-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.com wrote: I'll have to check on what the deal is with the tck results.  I'm not sure what our current license conditions are with Sun (not my area of expertise).  I'll let you know what I find out from our legal team. cool. There

Re: MyFaces 2.0 development going forward

2009-02-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
facelets work that we could pick up for you guys?  We're looking to help out As for you team... I'd recommend to sign and fax the Individual Contributor License Agreement (if you haven't done so already), see [1]. If you have an intellectual property agreement with your employer, they may also

[jira] Created: (MYFACES-2155) HtmlLinkRenderer did not recognize ankers (#)

2009-02-26 Thread Martin Haimberger (JIRA)
HtmlLinkRenderer did not recognize ankers (#) - Key: MYFACES-2155 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2155 Project: MyFaces Core Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Martin

[jira] Updated: (MYFACES-2155) HtmlLinkRenderer did not recognize ankers (#)

2009-02-26 Thread Martin Haimberger (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martin Haimberger updated MYFACES-2155: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) HtmlLinkRenderer did not recognize ankers

[jira] Created: (MYFACES-2156) Performance improvement in HtmlRenderKitImpl

2009-02-26 Thread Philipp Schoepf (JIRA)
Performance improvement in HtmlRenderKitImpl Key: MYFACES-2156 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2156 Project: MyFaces Core Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 1.1.6

Re: MyFaces 2.0 development going forward

2009-02-26 Thread Michael Concini
We already have taken care of the legal stuff. We had actually hoped to get involved in the 2.0 work much earlier but got stalled out waiting on legal in the fall. We're good to go on that now. Matthias Wessendorf wrote: facelets work that we could pick up for you guys? We're looking to

[Announce] Release of Apache MyFaces Trinidad 1.2.11

2009-02-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
The Apache MyFaces Trinidad team is pleased to announce the release of Apache MyFaces Trinidad Core 1.2.11. Apache MyFaces Trinidad is a JavaServer(tm) Faces 1.2 component library. Trinidad Core 1.2.11 is available in both binary and source distributions: *

[jira] Updated: (TOMAHAWK-1397) InputSuggestAjax breaks when using trinidad render-kit

2009-02-26 Thread Shawn Laubach (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn Laubach updated TOMAHAWK-1397: Status: Patch Available (was: Open) InputSuggestAjax breaks when using trinidad