Am 06.11.10 10:40, schrieb Matthias Wessendorf:
Hi,
I was wondering if there are any outstanding issue, or if we
should/could think about a 2.0.3 release for myfaces core.
Thanks!
Matthias
Hi, I want to get a bugfix in for the ipad, which I can commit today, I
guess I will postpone the other
Ich werde ab dem 08.11.2010 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
09.11.2010.
I will be out of the office from 08.11.2010. I will be returning on
09.11.2010.
Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
**
Am 08.11.10 09:54, schrieb Werner Punz:
Am 06.11.10 10:40, schrieb Matthias Wessendorf:
Hi,
I was wondering if there are any outstanding issue, or if we
should/could think about a 2.0.3 release for myfaces core.
Thanks!
Matthias
Hi, I want to get a bugfix in for the ipad, which I can commit
+1 on first fixing the Safari issues and Geronimo/JBoss integration.
Those three are big improvements and I guess they don't take much time to
finish, right?
Next week my MyFaces 2.0 iPad app will be on a big screen at the Devoxx
keynote! I'd like to use the 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT for this, with
jsf.js impl request function refactoring
Key: MYFACES-2966
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2966
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Werner Punz
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel
jankeesvanan...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 on first fixing the Safari issues and Geronimo/JBoss integration.
Those three are big improvements and I guess they don't take much time to
finish, right?
Next week my MyFaces 2.0 iPad app will be on a big
jsf.js i18n of internal error messages
--
Key: MYFACES-2967
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2967
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT
hi @ all,
imo it would be nice to refactor it for 2.0.4.
it would also allow an optional all-in-one jar file (mojarra is going to do
the same [1]).
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=924
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Werner Punz resolved MYFACES-2965.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT
resolved
MyFaces 2.0.2 AJAX crashes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Werner Punz resolved MYFACES-2966.
--
Resolution: Fixed
resolved
jsf.js impl request function refactoring
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Werner Punz resolved MYFACES-2967.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT
jsf.js i18n of internal error
Hi Guys I have now committed the latest js changes, including the safari
mobile bug workaround, I will do some additional testing on them this
week (in the mobile sector mostly), so that you guys will have a stable
codebase for devoxx next week.
I cannot do it during the day however due to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Kočí updated MYFACES-2882:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
3.4.2.6 Event Broadcasting: processing events during the
+1
Am 08.11.10 10:51, schrieb Gerhard:
hi @ all,
imo it would be nice to refactor it for 2.0.4.
it would also allow an optional all-in-one jar file (mojarra is going to
do the same [1]).
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=924
http://www.irian.at
Hi
Unfortunately, maven-shade-plugin has some unwanted side effects.
- The source jar file is not updated too, so if we shade shared, the
sources are not updated. In theory, the source jar is used by IDEs like
Eclipse or Netbeans to show the source file of a .class.
- It does not play well with
hi,
@ide-support:
since you get an additional all-in-one sources jar file, it should work.
i've created external codi examples which use the all-in-one jar of codi and
the ide support works perfectly.
@osgi:
if there are restrictions, we should improve the shade plugin.
(for now: osgi users just
Hi
2010/11/8 Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
hi,
@ide-support:
since you get an additional all-in-one sources jar file, it should work.
i've created external codi examples which use the all-in-one jar of codi
and the ide support works perfectly.
Yes, that's true (I checked that code)
Hi
2010/11/5 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
I'm trying to understand why the require-bundle header is in the api
bundle. This is a pretty bizarre thing to do in what I've seen of osgi.
Could you be more explicit about this point? I don't see anything bizarre
here.
I took it out and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12929661#action_12929661
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-2911:
-
myfaces-api jar are only tested
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACES-2911.
-
Resolution: Not A Problem
Assignee: Leonardo Uribe
OSGi Manifest: MyFaces API
Hi,
Last week I created a branch (see [1]) to test the shade module
integration of shared and also implee6 for MyFaces core.
Coincidentally, Leonardo committed a similar solution to MyFaces core
trunk, however only for the implee6 integration.
The branch at [1] uses the shade plugin to include
i agree with jakob.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2010/11/8 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
Hi,
Last week I created a branch (see [1]) to test the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12929688#action_12929688
]
Mike Kienenberger commented on MYFACES-2911:
For what it's worth, I think I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12929690#action_12929690
]
Mike Kienenberger commented on MYFACES-2911:
Update build to produce a single
Hi
2010/11/8 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
Hi,
Last week I created a branch (see [1]) to test the shade module
integration of shared and also implee6 for MyFaces core.
Coincidentally, Leonardo committed a similar solution to MyFaces core
trunk, however only for the implee6
Hi,
IMHO shared code ist just as private as myfaces-impl code. Not more, not less.
Adding the all-in-one-jar is not a change, but an improvement. It is
just an additional (non-OSGi-ready) distribution form of MyFaces code
and thus does not affect the problems we're having with myfaces-shared
and
again - i agree with jakob!
such an additional all-in-one dist won't change the situation for osgi
users. (for now) they just have to stick with the current jar files.
@shared:
the classes of the shared module would be in the impl. module, if we don’t
(have to) share them with other myfaces
Hi
2010/11/8 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
Hi,
IMHO shared code ist just as private as myfaces-impl code. Not more, not
less.
Yes, in theory, but in practice that rule is not maintained. To keep
backward
compatibility we can't change the package of DelegateServlet (maybe just
add
Hi
2010/11/8 Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
again - i agree with jakob!
such an additional all-in-one dist won't change the situation for osgi
users. (for now) they just have to stick with the current jar files.
@shared:
the classes of the shared module would be in the impl. module,
hi,
i didn't talk about copying the code to the impl. module. it would be a
normal module (similar to the shared module) which gets shadded into the
impl. module.
actually both approaches are very similar. so you have the same advantages
(compared to the shared module) and it's easier to handle
Hi
2010/11/8 Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
hi,
i didn't talk about copying the code to the impl. module. it would be a
normal module (similar to the shared module) which gets shadded into the
impl. module.
actually both approaches are very similar. so you have the same advantages
Hi
Leo, you are getting this all wrong. Please take a look at the
shade-branch, which I created, and then we can continue this
discussion.
Thanks.
Regards,
Jakob
2010/11/8 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com:
Hi
2010/11/8 Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
hi,
i didn't talk about copying the
Hi
No, I understand well, but maybe we are talking about many possible
enhancements at the same time.
I know how shade plugin works, after all, I did the necessary changes to use
it on implee6. That's the reason why I know well the problems involved. I
tried
to use it in myfaces-test but the
Before I spend a lot of time figuring out why FactoryFinder works in geronimo,
I wonder if there is any need for any of the impl classes to be exported for
any reason other than making them visible to FactoryFinder? If not then either
packaging api and impl in a single bundle or making the
Hi
2010/11/8 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
Before I spend a lot of time figuring out why FactoryFinder works in
geronimo, I wonder if there is any need for any of the impl classes to be
exported for any reason other than making them visible to FactoryFinder? If
not then either
If you don't need a shaded source jar, have you guys experimented with the
bundle plugin for generating this jar?
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 8, 2010, at 2:15 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
Hi
No, I understand well, but maybe we are talking about many possible
enhancements at the same time.
Hi
2010/11/8 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
If you don't need a shaded source jar, have you guys experimented with
the bundle plugin for generating this jar?
I have never tried it. Maybe someone else? But in this case have a shaded
source jar could be important.
regards,
Leonardo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12929809#action_12929809
]
Udo Schnurpfeil commented on TOBAGO-929:
You may test the next nighly build.
Hi,
I got this error while building for my Skin Versioning patch.
testBinaryCompatibility(org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.ClirrRunnerTest)
I built the other day and it was fine.
Did someone add a new test? I did add some new APIs.
What do I have to do to get this to pass? Looking at the
Jeanne,
This is the result of the api checks for backwards compatibility. The
trinidad-api/src/test/clirr/clirr-runner.txt file acts as a golden file
for allowed api changes. If your test fails, the target directory will
contain the clirr-runner.txt file of all of the api changes found.
Jeanne,
Was there an INFO diff?
Perhaps I should change it to ERROR only ..
-M
sent from my Android phone
On Nov 9, 2010 2:46 AM, Blake Sullivan blake.sulli...@oracle.com wrote:
Jeanne,
This is the result of the api checks for backwards compatibility. The
41 matches
Mail list logo