Sure - you know us, right?
regards,
Martin
On 5/16/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
looks like you guys are easy to entertain ;)
On 5/15/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the good laugh in the middle of the night, Matze! Welcome
aboard, Adam
Hmm... the server-side converters do use the currently set locale - so
they should support localization and I18n!
regards,
Martin
On 3/12/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Bob,
yes, there is a dojo,number package and since tomahawk already uses dojo,
i think it's fine to
We should mention as well that this is a Google SoC project - and yes,
we want to have the label/input functionality in there just like in
Trinidad.
regards,
Martin
On 5/8/07, Chris Hane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure if this is relevant or possible; but for the Trinidad piece it
would
will be a little large than
column 1 and everything in column two will be shifted down a couple of pixels.
Chris
Martin Marinschek wrote:
We should mention as well that this is a Google SoC project - and yes,
we want to have the label/input functionality in there just like in
Trinidad.
regards
Hi *,
for those of you who are at J1: anyone interested in going for a beer
after Manfred, Matthias, Dennis and my BOF wednesday at 8:55 pm,
Esplanade 305?
We'd meet up after the end of the BOF (will be around 10:00pm), and
then go for a beer somewhere closeby.
Cu there!
regards,
Martin
--
This array of modules makes my head go www..
Why can't we go back to the original suggestion, and separate in a
public API and an internal API, but in the same jar-file.
org.apache.myfaces.commons.public.*
org.apache.myfaces.commons.internal.*
And what's the reason again not to have a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Marinschek updated TOMAHAWK-758:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.6-SNAPSHOT
Status: Resolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Marinschek resolved TOMAHAWK-698.
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Fix Version/s: 1.1.6-SNAPSHOT
Hi guys,
just send the photos over to me, I'll collect them and Manfred,
Matthias, Dennis and me will compile the presentation. And we'll also
extend the picture to include some photos of the larger JSF community,
so Kito, your photo is of course welcome.
regards,
Martin
On 5/1/07, Cagatay
Hi *,
we (Manfred and me, but get in contact with us if you are at J1, we'll
share the stage!) have been accepted for a MyFaces community BOF at
J1, and as the community is the most important asset in this project,
we'd like to talk about the community.
What I've thought about is to do a
Well, that's an exceptionally good title as well!
thanks Bruno.
regards,
Martin
On 4/27/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hehe The Faces of MyFaces, focusing the community, the pillar of the
project, is a good idea. No problems for me :-)
Cheers,
Bruno
On 27/04/07, Martin
/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, that's an exceptionally good title as well!
thanks Bruno.
regards,
Martin
On 4/27/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hehe The Faces of MyFaces, focusing the community, the pillar of the
project, is a good idea. No problems
Yes, that would be great!
+1 from me.
regards,
Martin
On 4/21/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey folks,
the archetype is still 1.0-SNAPSHOT. The guy works fine.
Anyone interested in releasing it? I am traveling the next weeks,
therefore hard to push a archetype release.
Sure!
regards,
Martin
On 4/19/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cycle reference check should be fixed now in r530517. thanks again for the
peer review.
Best wishes,
Paul
On Apr 19, 2007, at 10:25 AM, Martin Marinschek wrote:
But still - you are short-circuiting the cyclic
Components: build process
Affects Versions: 1.1.6
Reporter: Martin Marinschek
Assigned To: Martin Marinschek
Fix For: 1.1.6-SNAPSHOT
Easy fix: just had to change the doctype to:
!DOCTYPE taglib
PUBLIC -//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD JSP Tag Library
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Marinschek resolved MYFACES-1591.
Resolution: Fixed
Improved error handling in config management
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Marinschek updated TOMAHAWK-966:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
PPR examples
ManagedBeanResolver.getValue() to go ahead
and return the managed bean immediately instead of returning null.
The first change (removing none from s_standardScopes) was really
just clean up since that code won't be used.
Best wishes,
Paul
On Apr 18, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Martin Marinschek wrote:
Hi Paul,
if you do
Hi *,
I wonder if we should switch the trunk to be the 1.2 branch now, cause
our next release will surely be fully 1.2 compatible (Tomcat 6 is out
now, so the sooner we're done, the better)... We'll have a lot better
testing of 1.2 if we do it like this - wdyt?
regards,
Martin
--
Ok, I'll start a vote - this is important enough that we should do a vote.
regards,
Martin
On 4/18/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jetty is also ready ;)
On 4/18/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi *,
I wonder if we should switch the trunk to be the 1.2
Hi *,
this is a formal vote on using the 1.2 branch as current now.
Steps in doing this:
- branch the current head as 1.1.5_1
- merge down the 1.2 branch to current head (that will be a lot of
work, I'll tackle it)
my +1 for doing this right now.
regards,
Martin
--
http://www.irian.at
On 4/18/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi *,
this is a formal vote on using the 1.2 branch as current now.
Steps in doing this:
- branch the current head as 1.1.5_1
- merge down the 1.2 branch to current head (that will be a lot of
work, I'll tackle it)
my +1 for doing
Hi Paul,
if you do the first change (introduce a scope where put does nothing),
I don't see why the second one needs to be done - putting will do
nothing, so you don't need the extra-check for none, right?
regards,
Martin
On 4/18/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wanted to
+0 - no time for testing currently.
regards,
Martin
On 4/16/07, Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 binding.
Tested. Works on all my local apps.
On 4/13/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ah, the real fun comes. when checking the javadoc or source jars :)
On 4/13/07,
Welcome aboard!
regards,
Martin
On 4/16/07, Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome Paul
On 4/13/07, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome!
On 4/13/07, Volker Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome Paul!
2007/4/12, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The
+1
regards,
Martin
On 4/16/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 16/04/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
--Manfred
On 4/15/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
the Trinidad community has voted to graduate and being a subproject of
the
Your ideas sound good, one thing that I remember was discussed while
implementing preserveRowStates - there were some problems with nested
data-tables - you'd need to work around those problems specifically.
What would be your idea of a key based on the row-data?
regards,
Martin
On 4/11/07,
can't think of a practical use case for this
(inputs on multiple rows for the same object), but that doesn't mean
that there isn't one.
On 4/11/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your ideas sound good, one thing that I remember was discussed while
implementing
Have you read Manfred's release diary? It seems he had problems with
an unresolved artifact yesterday night...
regards,
Martin
On 4/11/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/11/07, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since it appears their will be a 2nd release canidate for Tomahawk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Marinschek reopened MYFACES-278:
---
Assignee: (was: Martin Marinschek)
UIData does not processColumnChildren
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12486949
]
Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-1577:
Please revert this anyone - we have to accept a base
First - it's just a convenience, so you could remove it if you wanted,
with the possible disadvantages that Mike mentioned.
Second - the files were originally included, I removed them after
licensing issues were mentioned - then there was a lengthy discussion
(which I don't remember anymore),
It's basically about JavaScript-interaction - that should definitely
be solved in JSF 2.0. It has gotten better in the last RI and MyFaces
versions, but it's still not perfect, you're right. I posted it in my
wish-list for JSF 2.0.
regards,
Martin
On 3/30/07, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL
for now, +0 - please can somebody check thoroughly if impl 1.1.5 and
tomahawk 1.1.5 work really well together?
regards,
Martin
On 3/30/07, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 3/30/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
This is the official vote for MyFaces Tomahawk
+1 - even though there is some other options why this message would
show up, but this is probably the most common one.
form submission will still happen, by the way, it's just an undefined
state for value processing.
regards,
Martin
On 3/29/07, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
and good to me..
regards,
Martin
On 3/29/07, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good to me.
On 3/29/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I don't hear comments against it,
I'll do it in some days (to give feedback a chance ;-))
-M
On 3/29/07, Matthias
Hi *,
there is one more reason, why the component should be removed - it is
using prototype under the covers, and we moved to dojo a while ago.
regards,
Martin
On 3/29/07, Glauco Pimentel Gomes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And if you move the autoUpdateDataTable to jsf-comp in Source Forge?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484733
]
Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-1561:
Hi Christoph,
you should make sure that you don't
Well, I committed some stuff for the javascript-creation of the
commandButton - after you told me that I was save in doing so :(.
Maybe you want to revert this change, or at least test carefully?
regards,
Martin
On 3/20/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, correct IMHO.
Q to
Aranda baranda at apache dot org yes
Gabrielle Crawford gcrawford at apache dot org yes
Gerald Muellan gmuellan at apache dot org yes
Jeanne Waldman jwaldman at apache dot org yes
Martin van den Bemt mvdb at apache dot org yes
Martin Marinschek mmarinschek at apache dot org yes
I'd certainly be willing to be there!
regards,
Martin
On 3/16/07, Gary Horen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello MyFaces devs –
Back in December I proposed a panel discussion at JavaOne about the marriage
of JSF and Ajax. I tried to contact several random members of the MyFaces
development
+1 orchestra.
regards,
Martin
On 3/8/07, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you mean something like: programming JSF without glue?... you must be
without a clue!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthias Wessendorf
run this by the spec
folks. If nothing else, we should get a clarification for the next
revision.
On 3/1/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't find anything in the spec.
JavaDoc of getValue in UIOutput says:
Gets the value of this UIComponent. First, consult
my +1 for promoting this comp up to tomahawk. It's very useful, and I
use it in several production level apps. I have never had any issues
with its javascript either, but I don't have time to try to reproduce
the bug.
regards,
Martin
On 3/2/07, Jeff Bischoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does that
I'm certainly happy to do the interview - but whoever wants to join in
is very welcome. We might also not forget about Mario as an option for
doing the interview, he has been very active in the last year with new
ideas for MyFaces as well... Well, it's hard to decide who is supposed
to do an
Reporter: Martin Marinschek
Assigned To: Martin Marinschek
Fix For: 1.1.6-SNAPSHOT
I extracted the javascript of a button out to make sure it uses up less
html-code on the page. There is now one central javascript-method rendered
where before the javascript calls were
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Marinschek resolved MYFACES-1552.
Resolution: Fixed
Rendering less JavaScript for each button
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12477314
]
Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-1549:
Direct access to UIOutput getLocalValue:
http
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12477317
]
Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-1549:
Reduced state-array size again, and tried the fix from
Wanted to discuss a small thing with you:
UIOutput currently has the following code:
public Object getValue()
{
if (_value != null) return _value;
ValueBinding vb = getValueBinding(value);
return vb != null ? (Object)vb.getValue(getFacesContext()) : null;
, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wanted to discuss a small thing with you:
UIOutput currently has the following code:
public Object getValue()
{
if (_value != null) return _value;
ValueBinding vb = getValueBinding(value);
return vb != null
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476879
]
Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-1549:
I added the value in UIInput to the restoreState
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476878
]
Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-1549:
I had to change a bit more, cause the value field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Marinschek resolved MYFACES-1549.
Resolution: Fixed
MyFaces-API issue: getValue of UIInput
: 1.1.5
Reporter: Martin Marinschek
Assigned To: Martin Marinschek
Fix For: 1.1.6-SNAPSHOT
UIOutput currently has the following code:
public Object getValue()
{
if (_value != null) return _value;
ValueBinding vb = getValueBinding
Yeah, exactly. Did you read my mail from before? Plus my new issue-evaluation?
regards,
Martin
On 3/1/07, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think using a converter can cause this issue, here's the code from UIInput
public void validate(FacesContext context)
{
if (context
I wonder how Kleber sounds for English native speakers?
regards,
Martin
On 2/27/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for
Apache MyFaces Kleber
On 2/27/07, Arash Rajaeeyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose Chasb
Chasb means Glue in my native language, we can use other
Please open a jira-issue in our bug-tracker, and attach a patch there
(line-numbers should be included!)
regards,
Martin
On 2/28/07, Hanack, Leif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm using Spring WebFlow (SWF) in combination with MyFaces/Trinidad. I have
the problem that the
Well, at times a word means something different in another language,
or sounds like a different word?
regards,
Martin
On 2/28/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
same like glue sounds to me ...
On 2/28/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder how Kleber sounds
Ok, then I like it, and it gets my vote (on the other thread).
regards,
Martin
On 2/28/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Kienenberger schrieb:
It probably sounds like Clever.
Hmmm I start to like it :-)
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting,
I like a lot of the names, but Apache MyFaces Kleber is doing exactly
what the word means in German ;)
regards,
Martin
On 2/28/07, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Now I know what it is.
Paul Spencer
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi Paul!
Please include a description of Fusion on
Yeah, looks good - go ahead.
regards,
Martin
On 2/28/07, Jeff Bischoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JSFAttr class has the following attributes incompatible with Facelets:
// dataTable (extended) attributes
String ROW_ID =
org.apache.myfaces.dataTable.ROW_ID;
What we do is
a) private - so that's ok
b) changes behaviour - so that's not ok but is
c) configurable, so that's ok again
regards,
Martin
On 2/25/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think adding private methods to javax.faces.xxx classes is fine, isnt't
it ?
What do
Hey *,
I've finally found the time to go through the partial state-saving
stuff Martin Haimberger did through his Google SoC assignment and we
have together made sure the kinks are polished out pretty much. The
rest will:
a) enable much less state saved per each request (by a factor of 3,
4),
slightly too late, but 1.1.5 would have been my option as well.
other option: 1.5 - and let tomahawk and impl version numbers get out of sync.
regards,
Martin
On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, thanks for your feedback.
Branch 1.1.5 created.
--Manfred
On 2/23/07,
.
Paul Spencer
Martin Marinschek wrote:
slightly too late, but 1.1.5 would have been my option as well.
other option: 1.5 - and let tomahawk and impl version numbers get
out of
sync.
regards,
Martin
On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
) and a bug fix release. Therefore
+1 on Dennis' suggestion (JSF 1.1 - MyFaces 1.x, JSF 1.2 - MyFaces 2.x)
--Manfred
On 2/23/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dennis,
the problem is that you don't have any leeway to change the
MyFaces-API (read: not JSF API) incompatible
.x.y
1.2 - 2.x.y
is the better one...
--Manfred
On 2/23/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dennis,
the problem is that you don't have any leeway to change the
MyFaces-API (read: not JSF API) incompatible to what it had been
before. Well, given we finally reach
That would indeed be a very good change. Creating your own renderer
for Trinidad is quite hard currently...
regards,
Martin
On 2/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@MyFaces-API: well, Trinidad regards all Trinidad-component classes as
a Trinidad-API. We were once discussing
?
This would allow Tomahawk, like Tobago, to be version
independently
of MyFaces.
Paul Spencer
Martin Marinschek wrote:
slightly too late, but 1.1.5 would have been my option as
well.
other option: 1.5 - and let tomahawk and impl version
Wow. I wonder how anyone will ever find out if they typed it or if
they just copied ;)
regards,
Martin
On 2/23/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Geronimo project recently encountered this situation for several
JEE schemas. It wasn't totally clear whether or not including the Sun
I can imagine ;)
regards,
Martin
On 2/23/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That could be difficult to prove but I'm willing to testify that the
person who typed in most of the specs by hand looked very very
exhausted afterwards :-)
Best wishes,
Paul
On 2/23/07, Martin Marinschek
Hi Paul,
the file that was the goal of this navigation case didn't exist on my
PC - so it was marked red in my configuration file.
Is this a test with a non-existing file?
regards,
Martin
On 2/22/07, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The commit[1] removed the navigation case to
Marinschek
Assigned To: Martin Marinschek
Fix For: 1.1.5
In the MyFaces-generated JavaScript for links, the parameter for saving the id
of the link has been changed from:
_link_hidden
to
_idcl
This was necessary to increase compatibility with the RI 1.1 - without
Don't hit to hard on Mario - he tried to start a discussion on this
list, but there was no response (it was not about the name fusion, but
about the technical details of the spring-conversation stuff).
Sometimes there needs to be a commit in open source, so that the
discussion can start.
And I
Most of this code has been in the sandbox before. It has been moved to
another place, to discuss the possibility of a new subproject which
deals with glue-code properly.
regards,
Martin
On 2/22/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not an arbitrary and unnecessary split - as:
- it's not a component library, it is about glue-code
- it works with any component library, not only tomahawk
- it has dependencies to Spring, and I personally don't think tomahawk
should have some
regards,
Martin
On 2/22/07, Mike
@troubles: just like you should never put component-bindings in session-scope.
regards,
Martin
On 2/23/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Werner Punz schrieb:
Hold on matthias a little bit, I just gave mario the code for the jpa
conversation glue.
So I have jpa already running here.
no, no, it's not a bug - it's a divine feature ;)
regards,
Martin
On 2/15/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the holly IDE has a bug ???
On 2/15/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Volker!
for which reason can the normal findComponent fail?
I don't think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Marinschek resolved MYFACES-1535.
Resolution: Fixed
findComponent slow for a high amount of calls
: General
Affects Versions: 1.1.4
Reporter: Martin Marinschek
Assigned To: Martin Marinschek
Fix For: 1.1.6-SNAPSHOT
Profiling showed that findComponent takes a considerable amount of time to
complete if called quite often (and many components do call findComponent
oh no...
thanks for the heads up!
regards,
Martin
On 2/15/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Martin!
---
myfaces/core/trunk/api/src/main/java/javax/faces/context/FacesContext.java
(original)
+++
myfaces/core/trunk/api/src/main/java/javax/faces/context/FacesContext.java Thu
ask Bruno ?? Thanks.
Martin Marinschek wrote:
Hi Tim,
-- this definitely seems like a reasonable target, what w've heard
from Bruno on this list, who's working on it mostly currently.
-- the plans of the community have been to have it much earlier, but
well, Open Source is not always on time
Why does the normal findComponent method fail for you?
regards,
Martin
On 2/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: imario
Date: Tue Feb 13 09:58:27 2007
New Revision: 507121
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=507121
Log:
use an aggressive strategy (traverse the
Hi Tim,
-- this definitely seems like a reasonable target, what w've heard
from Bruno on this list, who's working on it mostly currently.
-- the plans of the community have been to have it much earlier, but
well, Open Source is not always on time
-- My personal view: yes, definitely
-- No
There was someone who wrote an automatic test to check for this - I
don't remember who and when that was, though. Can you have a look into
the test directories and check? Maybe you can extend one of the
test-classes instead of writing a new utility?
regards,
Martin
On 2/6/07, Werner Punz
+1
TCK has been done a while ago - we should rerun it before cutting the final
release, though, but I don't see any changes affecting TCK compatibility.
regards,
Martin
On 2/2/07, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.1.5 has been through TCK, right?
Dennis Byrne
On 2/2/07, Manfred
Hmm, if you can quickly do it, you should - cause Thomas is on vacations
next week.
regards,
Martin
On 2/3/07, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Thomas going to do this or am I? I need to know quickly because I
won't have time after Sunday night.
Dennis Byrne
On 2/3/07, Martin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464900
]
Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-1396:
Hi Paul,
I believe that MyFaces is indeed misbehaving
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464905
]
Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-1411:
Hi guys,
Nikolay has sent me offline both the CLA
ok, all clear - then go ahead and do the update!
regards,
Martin
On 1/9/07, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK last dojo upgrade is done by Sylvain and it's 0.4.0 since then.
Version in tomahawk repo also shows 0.4.0.
0.4.1 is a bugfix release.
On 1/9/07, Martin Marinschek
Hasn't Tomahawk been upgraded to dojo 0.4.1. a while ago?
Is there a bugfix-release for 0.4.1 coming out?
regards,
Martin
On 1/9/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cagatay
Coast Guard
a coast guard needs SVG ? :)
-M
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
Or reimplementing them.
regards,
Martin
On 1/5/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case of of not sending by end of jan;
I am +1 on doing a undo on these extensions.
JM2C
-M
On 1/5/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Nikolay,
your ICLA seems not to have
I wonder how we can handle the case of adding components
programmatically with this approach.
@Jacob: Have you thought up a solution for this?
regards,
Martin
On 12/22/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, my idea was probably partially inspired by things I read over
the last
Supporting maintenance releases for our customers is one of the goals
of IRIAN, so if you need a maintenance release for certain projects, I
encourage you to take a look at the support contracts available from
IRIAN.at.
regards,
Martin
On 12/21/06, Jeff Bischoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tested the modal dialog recently on both browsers?
regards,
Martin
On 12/20/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I want to suggest the promotion of following dojo components:
a) The dojo modal dialog
b) The dojo fisheye component
both components seem to be stable enough to
Reporter: Nikolay Petrov
Assigned To: Martin Marinschek
Fix For: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
Attachments: ApplyRequestValuesExecutor.java,
InvokeApplicationExecutor.java, LifecycleImpl.java, PhaseExecutor.java,
ProcessValidationsExecutor.java
+1
regards,
Martin
On 12/18/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
This release contains over 70 changes.
Which explains why my inbox has had so many commit messages in it lately.
Dennis Byrne
-Original Message-
From: Bernd Bohmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday,
Hi Tim,
you can take old 1.1 applications and they should still run on 1.2
without a problem. But, as mentioned before, the 1.2 version of
MyFaces is not yet done and as such not working.
regards,
Martin
On 12/8/06, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bruno, Even with the caveat that
My +1 for integrating it though, go ahead.
regards,
Martin
On 12/9/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tim,
you can take old 1.1 applications and they should still run on 1.2
without a problem. But, as mentioned before, the 1.2 version of
MyFaces is not yet done
601 - 700 of 2425 matches
Mail list logo
