and/or @author tags, i start this formal vote.
please vote with
-
[ ] +1 for: stop using svn-keywords and @author tags (+ remove the
remaining)
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for: we should keep svn
-keywords (pmc):
- Leonardo Uribe
1 binding +0 vote for removing @author tags with exceptions (pmc):
- Leonardo Uribe
1 binding +0 vote (pmc):
- Werner Punz
no -1 votes
regards,
gerhard
2013/10/14 Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org
hi @ all,
we already had a discussion as well
contain
svn-keywords
and/or @author tags, i start this formal vote.
please vote with
-
[ ] +1 for: stop using svn-keywords and @author
and/or @author tags, i start this formal vote.
please vote with
-
[ ] +1 for: stop using svn-keywords and @author tags (+ remove the
remaining)
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for: we should keep svn
is finished.
however, since we still have (even new) parts which contain svn-keywords
and/or @author tags, i start this formal vote.
please vote with
-
[ ] +1 for: stop using svn-keywords
+1
All the 'hard facts' (means who committed what and when) are in our SCM anyway.
Noone need to fear that his merrit vanishes only because we remove the @author
tags. People know exactly who does the vast majority of the work - so it's also
time to say txs to Leo and all other passionate
hi @ all,
we already had a discussion as well as an agreement about it (starting
point: [1]). in several modules the cleanup is finished.
however, since we still have (even new) parts which contain svn-keywords
and/or @author tags, i start this formal vote.
please vote
and/or @author tags, i start this formal vote.
please vote with
-
[ ] +1 for: stop using svn-keywords and @author tags (+ remove the
remaining)
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for: we should keep svn-keywords
+1 for removing author tags.
+1 for removing most svn tags
There's value in having the svn version tag as you can't tell what
version of the file you are working with once the file is used outside
of svn.
On the other hand, having the svn version tag can make diffing changes
more difficult.
So
+0 for removing author tags. Note there is code licensed under ASL that was
originally taken from other sources, and it is a good idea to keep the
references of where that code came from. For example:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk/shared/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces
+0 from my side, I simply do not care, I can live with both solutions.
Werner
Am 14.10.13 16:18, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
+0 for removing author tags. Note there is code licensed under ASL that
was originally taken from other sources, and it is a good idea to keep
the references of where
...@gmail.com
+0 for removing author tags. Note there is code licensed under ASL that
was originally taken from other sources, and it is a good idea to keep the
references of where that code came from. For example:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk/shared/src/main/java/org
2008/2/13, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Currently there are a lot of @author tags in MyFaces code, and I see
that they are still being added to (at least some) new files.
Should this be normal, or should they be phased out?
At Struts and Tiles we removed them all, since the author of a file
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Antonio Petrelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/2/13, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Currently there are a lot of @author tags in MyFaces code, and I see
that they are still being added to (at least some) new files.
Should this be normal, or should
Hi All,
Currently there are a lot of @author tags in MyFaces code, and I see
that they are still being added to (at least some) new files.
Should this be normal, or should they be phased out?
I'm in favour of getting rid of them. I don't mean any disrespect to
those people who did a lot of hard
I have no problems with the author tags, but maybe we want to consider
adding svn keywords?
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn.advanced.props.special.keywords.html
On Feb 13, 2008 1:06 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Currently there are a lot of @author tags in MyFaces code
Hi,
On Feb 13, 2008 9:06 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Currently there are a lot of @author tags in MyFaces code, and I see
that they are still being added to (at least some) new files.
Should this be normal, or should they be phased out?
I'm in favour of getting rid of them
And there is always the possibility to run svn blame to retrieve more
concrete information.
Regards,
Arvid
@author tag topic discussion again?:) I thought we've gotten over with it.
On Feb 13, 2008 11:09 PM, Arvid Hülsebus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And there is always the possibility to run svn blame to retrieve more
concrete information.
Regards,
Arvid
Maybe we could use the mvn checkstyle plugin to catch these.. :)
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
On Feb 13, 2008 9:06 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Currently there are a lot of @author tags in MyFaces code, and I see
that they are still being added to (at least some) new files
Hi
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Cagatay Civici
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@author tag topic discussion again?:) I thought we've gotten over with it.
depends on the perspective ;-) Since most committers wanted them, we kept them
(thread(s) discussing that, can be found in the archives)
-M
.
geir
BTW, I'm ccing the dev list because Matze moved it there.
Dennis Byrne
regards,
Martin
On 2/25/07, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm fine with removing the author tags, too.
We can enforce this with a checkstyle rule:
!-- No @author tags --
module name
moving this discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Feb 26, 2007 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: @author tags
To: MyFaces PMC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As to why, Greg Stein sums it up well here:
* http://tinyurl.com/mw7t6
This issues has
+1 for removing them
On 2/26/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
moving this discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Feb 26, 2007 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: @author tags
To: MyFaces PMC [EMAIL PROTECTED
24 matches
Mail list logo
