[ORCHESTRA] Spring-Webflow

2007-11-09 Thread Martin Marinschek
Hi guys, I've just heard that Spring-Webflow will add JPA-support in the next release. We should dress warmer here ;) regards, Martin -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Re: [ORCHESTRA] Spring-Webflow

2007-11-09 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Yes, from the 2-version of it. Was already discussed here :-) -Matthias On Nov 9, 2007 9:16 AM, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, I've just heard that Spring-Webflow will add JPA-support in the next release. We should dress warmer here ;) regards, Martin --

Re: [ORCHESTRA] Spring-Webflow

2007-11-09 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! I've just heard that Spring-Webflow will add JPA-support in the next release. We should dress warmer here ;) Yes, I already know that. Well, competition is always good ;-) I see: 1) JBoss Seam, which might be very feature-full but which is also very intrusive to your application and

Re: [ORCHESTRA] Spring-Webflow

2007-11-09 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
From my perspective, I'd use Orchestra because it is really lightweight, in usage. Configuration is done once, and easy to re-use the orchestra specific cfg. the nav-flow w/ Orchestra is plain JSF, that is a plus. -M On Nov 9, 2007 9:34 AM, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I've

Re: [ORCHESTRA] Spring-Webflow

2007-11-09 Thread Martin Marinschek
Hi guys, but the sub-flow feature is missing... If we'd have that (eventually in native JSF-configuration style, one subflow in a different file) Orchestra would be feature complete. @Seam: have you seen the public early release draft of web-beans? Seam is not going to look like Seam when this

Re: [ORCHESTRA] Spring-Webflow

2007-11-09 Thread Martin Marinschek
we could have main faces-config.xml: navigation-rule from-view-idx.jsp/from-view-id navigation-case to-view-idflow1:y.jsp/to-view-id /navigation-case /navigation-rule then a flow1-config.xml with navigation-rule from-view-idy.jsp/from-view-id navigation-case

Re: [ORCHESTRA] Spring-Webflow

2007-11-09 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Nov 9, 2007 11:01 AM, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, but the sub-flow feature is missing... If we'd have that (eventually in native JSF-configuration style, one subflow in a different file) Orchestra would be feature complete. true, that would allow kind of reusage of

Re: [ORCHESTRA] Spring-Webflow

2007-11-09 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
After a first quick though I like the idea. See inline for some notes main faces-config.xml: navigation-rule from-view-idx.jsp/from-view-id navigation-case to-view-idflow1:y.jsp/to-view-id /navigation-case /navigation-rule then a flow1-config.xml with that is nice convention

Re: [ORCHESTRA] Spring-Webflow

2007-11-09 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! I am not sure if I talk about the same, but In Orchestra it is all about beans. What would be nice is, if we could define a page-flow (state A) having it's own set of beans and being able to enter the page-flow (state B) again and having a new set of beans then (effectively the same

Re: [ORCHESTRA] Spring-Webflow

2007-11-09 Thread Martin Marinschek
Hi Mario, we are talking about navigation here, you about beans. Problem: there is a wizard for editing a person - you can start this wizard from the person-list, but also from the company list. After you have finished editing the person, you want to return to the list you started at. How do

Re: [ORCHESTRA] Spring-Webflow

2007-11-09 Thread Duong BaTien
Hi: Can you give a link to early release draft of web-beans I look at the just released Seam-2.0.0.GA and do not see the changes you mention. Thanks BaTien On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 11:01 +0100, Martin Marinschek wrote: Hi guys, but the sub-flow feature is missing... If we'd have that

Re: [ORCHESTRA] Spring-Webflow

2007-11-09 Thread Duong BaTien
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 03:24 -0700, Duong BaTien wrote: Hi: Can you give a link to early release draft of web-beans I look at the just released Seam-2.0.0.GA and do not see the changes you mention. Thanks BaTien Yes, i got it. Thanks for pointed out. On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 11:01 +0100,