[Tomahawk] Tomahawk Tiles2 intregration example

2008-01-11 Thread linux.eavilesa
Hello, Could anybody provide an example of using Tomahawk Tiles2 integration configuration? When is intended to be released this new feature? Is it compatible with Tomahawk + trinidad? Thanks a lot in advance Esteve Avilés

Re: [Tomahawk] Tiles2

2007-10-30 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
If nobody care, I'll put it into sandbox. Thx, Matthias On 10/24/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, regarding TOMAHAWK-1115 ([1]), do we want to support it inside of Tomahawk, or the sandbox ? -Matthias [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1115 --

Re: [Tomahawk] Tiles2

2007-10-30 Thread Andrew Robinson
If we can put Tiles2 dependencies into Tomahawk, why not put facelets code directly into Tomahawk? On 10/30/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If nobody care, I'll put it into sandbox. Thx, Matthias On 10/24/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, regarding

Re: [Tomahawk] Tiles2

2007-10-30 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I guess due to legacy ? The current Tomahawk TileViewHandler has dependency to struts-tiles... I was agreeing with the point of Mario, that a tomahawk component has to work with JSP in any case. That doesn't mean, we really can't add Facelets in there... kind of optional. I really don't care

Re: [Tomahawk] Tiles2

2007-10-30 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! If we can put Tiles2 dependencies into Tomahawk, why not put facelets code directly into Tomahawk? I think we should refactor the sandbox (move it out of tomahawk). One Sandbox for the whole MyFaces community might be enough, no? Said that, you can put the Tiles2 into the sandbox, but

[Tomahawk] Tiles2

2007-10-24 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, regarding TOMAHAWK-1115 ([1]), do we want to support it inside of Tomahawk, or the sandbox ? -Matthias [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1115 -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org