Hi
Thanks to all people who vote
We have 6 +1
Werner Punz
Michael Kurz
Martin Koci
Grant Smith
Mike Kienenberger
Leonardo Uribe
so we can continue with the necessary steps to release MyFaces Core 2.2.3
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.2.3 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
The artifacts passed the TCK test of Feb 2013 (jsftck-2.2_26-Feb-2013.zip).
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.2.2 [1]
2.
+1
2014-04-22 12:20 GMT+02:00 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.2.3 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
The artifacts passed the TCK test of Feb 2013 (jsftck-2.2_26-Feb-2013.zip).
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following
- signatures and checksums match
- source builds
- apache rat passes
+1
Below are the linux commands I used to verify the release of the
myfaces-core-assembly-2.2.3-src files:
=
# check checksums
find . -name '*.md5' -exec cat {} \; -printf ' %f\n'
+1
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.comwrote:
- signatures and checksums match
- source builds
- apache rat passes
+1
Below are the linux commands I used to verify the release of the
myfaces-core-assembly-2.2.3-src files:
+1
2014-04-22 12:20 GMT+02:00 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.2.3 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
The artifacts passed the TCK test of Feb 2013 (jsftck-2.2_26-Feb-2013.zip).
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following
+1
Am 22.04.2014 um 18:16 schrieb Martin Kočí martin.kocicak.k...@gmail.com:
+1
2014-04-22 12:20 GMT+02:00 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.2.3 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
The artifacts passed the TCK test of Feb 2013
+1
Werner
Am 22.04.14 12:20, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.2.3 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
The artifacts passed the TCK test of Feb 2013 (jsftck-2.2_26-Feb-2013.zip).
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1.
+1
LieGrue,
strub
On Wednesday, 16 April 2014, 19:18, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
2014-04-16 19:17 GMT+02:00 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.2.3 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
The artifacts passed the TCK test of Feb
Sorry. -1
Rat shows that we have several non-trivial files that are missing headers:
impl/src/test/resources/org/apache/myfaces/view/facelets/pss/acid/resources/testComposite/dynComp_1.xhtml
Hi
Those files are used for test only. Is it so important to block a quick fix
release?
Regards
Leonardo
On Apr 17, 2014 11:36 AM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry. -1
Rat shows that we have several non-trivial files that are missing headers:
I've cleaned up all of these files. Trunk builds and passes rat, so a
new release candidate should pass rat as well.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry. -1
Rat shows that we have several non-trivial files that are missing headers:
You asked about licensing on test files the last time this came up as
well so I will point to my previous reply for that topic:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/201209.mbox/%3ccam1yojbz2jn5obhkfavo-v5rvfauzsk0yjeoj66pm+wejk_...@mail.gmail.com%3E
As for a quick fix release, It
For what it's worth, if you and two other people disagree that the
licensing of these files should be a blocking issue, you can still do
a release. As the release manager, the final decision is yours so
long as you have a majority approval. [1]
[1]
Ok, so it is unavoidable. I didn't knew that. The problem is rat plugin is
never executed automatically as part of the release, so there is no chance
to detect and fix it early. I'll take a look at that.
On Apr 17, 2014 12:54 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote:
You asked about
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is rat plugin is
never executed automatically as part of the release, so there is no chance
to detect and fix it early. I'll take a look at that.
I really hate having to vote against a release just because we
I usually do wiki page for each release. The one for 2.2.3 is here:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/CoreRelease223
There are two options, or we put the rat plugin command at the beginning,
or we add the plugin when the release preparations are done. The idea is
if a file miss the license, the rat
Hi
I have tried adding this fragment on core/parent/pom.xml
profile
idprepare-release/id
activation
property
nameprepareRelease/name
/property
/activation
build
plugins
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.2.3 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
The artifacts passed the TCK test of Feb 2013 (jsftck-2.2_26-Feb-2013.zip).
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.2.2 [1]
2.
+1
2014-04-16 19:17 GMT+02:00 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.2.3 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
The artifacts passed the TCK test of Feb 2013 (jsftck-2.2_26-Feb-2013.zip).
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following
-1
I have serious problems with version 2.2.3 provided by Leo and with the current
snapshot in one of my examples. It seems, that there is some problem with
resources or templates or both. The application works and looks fine with 2.2.1
and 2.2.2 but not with 2.2.3 or the current snapshot.
Hi
We have only 6 changes in the release, and none of them are related to
templates or resources. (3 for html friendly markup, 1 for the wrappers, 1
for the PostRestoreStateEvent, 1 for for attribute in a converter).
Could you please give us more information about the specific example?. So I
can
I created MYFACES-3882 including my application.
Best regards
Michi
Am 12.04.2014 um 15:47 schrieb Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com:
Hi
We have only 6 changes in the release, and none of them are related to
templates or resources. (3 for html friendly markup, 1 for the wrappers, 1
for
Hi
The problem is caused because h:outputScript and h:outputStylesheet
are the only components that does not have implemented its attributes
in the component class, and instead they use an instance of UIOutput.
This cause a problem with the new algorithm in place for html5
friendly markup,
+1
Am 08.04.14 17:11, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.2.3 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
The artifacts passed the TCK test of Feb 2013 (jsftck-2.2_26-Feb-2013.zip).
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven
, I was running the needed tasks to get
the 2.2.3 release of Apache
From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org,
Date: 04/08/2014 11:11 AM
Subject: [VOTE] release of MyFaces Core 2.2.3
--
Hi,
I was running the needed
+1
Regards,
Paul Nicolucci
From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org,
Date: 04/08/2014 11:11 AM
Subject:[VOTE] release of MyFaces Core 2.2.3
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.2.3 release of Apache
MyFaces core out
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.2.3 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
The artifacts passed the TCK test of Feb 2013 (jsftck-2.2_26-Feb-2013.zip).
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.2.2 [1]
2.
+1
2014-04-08 17:11 GMT+02:00 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.2.3 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
The artifacts passed the TCK test of Feb 2013 (jsftck-2.2_26-Feb-2013.zip).
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following
29 matches
Mail list logo
