Yeah, this is a complex issue. And trinidad doesn't do it right
either. Here is what I was going to do for Trinidad (in my copious
amounts of spare time). :)
Each Portlet would have a root element. When a form is submitted via
ppr, the view state for each javax.faces.ViewState under that
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I want to know if any developer has a reason to avoid render this id, and
if
no objections I'll commit this change in 72 hours (doing this
s:inputSuggestAjax and s:tableSuggestAjax could work with trinidad
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to know if any developer has a reason to avoid render
this id, and if
no objections I'll commit this change in 72 hours (doing this
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to know if any developer has a reason to avoid render
this
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
why not getElementsByName[0] ?
Well, in general document.getElementById is both faster and more elegant.
So in this case, rendering this component with id=clientId seems reasonable.
Hmm..but it is possible that there are multiple view state fields in
the page, one per form.
Mario Ivankovits schrieb:
Hi!
why not getElementsByName[0] ?
Well, in general document.getElementById is both faster and more
elegant.
So in this case, rendering this component with id=clientId seems
reasonable.
Hmm..but it is possible that there are multiple view state
Hi!
And also ensure that every ViewState will be replaced and not only the
first [0] one.
When you do have multiple JSF forms (which is valid) each ViewState
needs to be replaced.
Yes, but only when they came from the same view!
I don't know much about JSF portal bridge stuff. Can this
Hi!
I ignore what happens when use multiple jsf portlets in the same page,
or when the page is using multiple forms on the same page (normal
submits should work on both environmets, but ajaxified components?).
With I ignore you mean you will not replace the ViewState for each
form having a
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I ignore what happens when use multiple jsf portlets in the same page,
or when the page is using multiple forms on the same page (normal
submits should work on both environmets, but ajaxified components?).
Hi
Checking some tomahawk stuff I have noted that when I'm using trinidad (any
version 1.1 and 1.2) at the end of the form the hidden field that stores or
references the state:
input type=hidden name=javax.faces.ViewState
never render its id=javax.faces.ViewState as myfaces and jsf ri does.
I made a mistake copy paste the code of writeState. Actually looks like
this:
public void writeState(
FacesContext context,
StateManager.SerializedView serializedView) throws IOException
{
ResponseWriter rw = context.getResponseWriter();
rw.startElement(input, null);
I want to know if any developer has a reason to avoid render this id, and if
no objections I'll commit this change in 72 hours (doing this
s:inputSuggestAjax and s:tableSuggestAjax could work with trinidad and/or
facelets and solve TOMAHAWK-1157).
so, I guess I am not 100% getting your mail.
15 matches
Mail list logo
