Hi!
public interface AjaxTreeDataProvider {
public List getRootNodes();
public List getChildNodes(String nodeString);
}
Shouldn't this be something like this:
public interface AjaxTreeDataProvider {
public List getRootNodes();
public List getChildNodes(Object node);
/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Interest-in-an-AjaxTree-tp15258543p15641288.html
Sent from the My Faces - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
regards,
Gerald
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Interest-in-an-AjaxTree
Hi Matt!
welcome tree3;
Matthias is right. What are the differences to the existing tree2 component?
Having tree2 enhanced to do ajaxed-node-fetching would greatly increase
the chance that your patch will be accepted. We really would like to
avoid to introduce yet another tree. Do
Just that you can't have this ajaxed-node-fetching which would be really
a nice feature I often whished to have.
Yes, you can put tree2 in a ppr group (which I already did), but you
have to fetch the whole tree in node toggling, no?
Yes, that`s right. The whole tree has to be embedded inside
Hi,
welcome tree3;
:)
Matthias is right. What are the differences to the existing tree2 component?
Would be very confusing to have yet-another tree which does more or
less the same.
Tree2 can also be extended easily via existing ajax frameworks.
What kind of js library are you using?
I'm
On Feb 5, 2008 9:59 AM, Gerald Müllan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just that you can't have this ajaxed-node-fetching which would be really
a nice feature I often whished to have.
Yes, you can put tree2 in a ppr group (which I already did), but you
have to fetch the whole tree in node
and add a patch so that we can see the
technical details it would be great.
Ciao,
Mario
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Interest-in-an-AjaxTree-tp15258543p15275226.html
Sent from the My Faces - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
!
Is it an all new component or did you enhance tree2?
If you could open a jira ticket and add a patch so that we can see the
technical details it would be great.
Ciao,
Mario
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Interest-in-an-AjaxTree-tp15258543p15275226
be great.
Ciao,
Mario
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Interest-in-an-AjaxTree-tp15258543p15275226.html
Sent from the My Faces - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http
I've got a Tree component that handles node expansions via Ajax. What do you
think the interest would be in having this donated to Tomahawk?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Interest-in-an-AjaxTree-tp15258543p15258543.html
Sent from the My Faces - Dev mailing list archive
Matt Tyson schrieb:
I've got a Tree component that handles node expansions via Ajax. What do you
think the interest would be in having this donated to Tomahawk?
I'd say: Yes!
Is it an all new component or did you enhance tree2?
If you could open a jira ticket and add a patch so that we
12 matches
Mail list logo
