it?
Ciao,
Mario
[1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf
++1
That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that
was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale
project
Craig McClanahan schrieb:
I'm on the expert group for WebBeans[1], along with a bunch of other
people. There will definitely be some functional overlap on what
Shale calls the dialog manager -- you will really really really want
to pick one framework for that kind of stuff, be it Shale's,
On 6/28/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig McClanahan schrieb:
I'm on the expert group for WebBeans[1], along with a bunch of other
people. There will definitely be some functional overlap on what
Shale calls the dialog manager -- you will really really really want
to pick one
Craig wrote:
Doesn't myfaces-goodies have a nice ring?
Yepp ... sound nice ;-)
Kito D. Mann wrote:
I don't know -- this might be confusing since Matthias already has
FacesGoodies [1] :-) .
would be myfaces-orchestra-goodies, should be enough dissociation
between FacesGoodies then, I hope
Mario,
What about stability of sourceforge lately? I used it in the past, but
was disappointed about speed and reachability.
I had no problems with sourceforge for a long time when working on jsf-comp.
Cagatay
On 6/26/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig wrote:
Doesn't
Cagatay Civici wrote:
Mario,
What about stability of sourceforge lately? I used it in the past, but
was disappointed about speed and reachability.
I had no problems with sourceforge for a long time when working on
jsf-comp.
Ok, so lets sum up ...
Use the jsf-comp space for
Use the module name myfaces-orchestra-goodies.
+1
go ahead ! :)
What do you think?
Ciao,
Mario
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
+1,
Use the jsf-comp space for myfaces-orchestra non-asf license compatible
stuff. (Given the project owners accept it ;-) )
Yeah they will, for example JSF ChartCreator uses JFreeChart which is LGPL;)
Cagatay
On 6/27/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use the module name
it?
Ciao,
Mario
[1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf
++1
That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that
was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale
project:
http
. e.g. when
depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1].
Any objections about it?
Ciao,
Mario
[1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf
++1
That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention
depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1].
Any objections about it?
Ciao,
Mario
[1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf
g t; ;
++1
That name works, of course, but I also like
it?
Ciao,
Mario
[1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf
++1
That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that
was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale
project:
http://code.google.com
at code.google.com to host any
code not
allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g.
when
depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1].
Any objections about it?
Ciao,
Mario
[1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces
Use the jsf-comp space for myfaces-orchestra non-asf license compatible
stuff. (Given the project owners accept it ;-) )
No problem with me to use Jsf-Comp
Development'
Subject: RE: Orchestra on code.google.com
If you guys decide to use JSF comp, I suggest pushing them for a little
better PR. No one really knows all of the goodies they have...
~~~
Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces
Development
Subject: Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
Cagatay Civici wrote:
Mario,
What about stability of sourceforge lately? I used it in the past,
but
was disappointed about speed and reachability.
I had no problems with sourceforge for a long time when working on
jsf-comp.
Ok, so
,
Mario
[1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf
++1
already [1].
Any objections about it?
Ciao,
Mario
[1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf
++1
That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that
was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale
project:
http://code.google.com/p/shale
Craig McClanahan schrieb:
That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that
was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale
project:
http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies
Doesn't myfaces-goodies have a nice ring?
Craig
Excellent suggestion
AM
To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
Subject: Re: Orchestra on code.google.com
Craig McClanahan schrieb:
That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention
that
was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale
project:
http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies
Kito D. Mann schrieb:
I don't know -- this might be confusing since Matthias already has
FacesGoodies [1] :-).
[1] http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies/
Why not adding it to facesgoodies then?
Hi!
Kito D. Mann schrieb:
I don't know -- this might be confusing since Matthias already has
FacesGoodies [1] :-).
[1] http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies/
Why not adding it to facesgoodies then?
I understand facesgoodies as template for quickstarting an application.
I'd
of the components are used...
regards
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 3:29 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Orchestra on code.google.com
Hi!
code.google.com is fine for that.
I'd like to start
Perhaps this has been covered already, but does it have binary deps on
MyFaces? Or just the JSF API? If Orchstra has no dep on the MyFaces
implementation, you may be able to open this up to more users and you
wouldn't have to find a new name - just add it to facesgoodies.
Dennis Byrne
On
Hi Dennis!
Perhaps this has been covered already, but does it have binary deps on
MyFaces? Or just the JSF API?
No deps to MyFaces, else it would be a bug.
If Orchstra has no dep on the MyFaces implementation, you may be able
to open this up to more users and you wouldn't have to find a new
not
allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when
depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1].
Any objections about it?
Ciao,
Mario
[1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf
++1
That name works, of course, but I
objections about it?
Ciao,
Mario
[1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf
++1
That name works, of course, but I also like the naming convention that
was used for Shale extras that didn't fit into the usual Shale
project:
http://code.google.com/p/shale
allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when
depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1].
Any objections about it?
Ciao,
Mario
[1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf
++1
That name works
objections about it?
Ciao,
Mario
[1] http://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Hi!
code.google.com is fine for that.
I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code not
allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when
depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name already [1].
Any objections about it?
Ciao,
Mario
[1] http://code.google.com/p
://code.google.com/p/myfaces-orchestra-nonasf
31 matches
Mail list logo
