Re: LICENSE and NOTICE contents / headers

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 09:40:40AM +1100, Justin Mclean wrote: > I think the LICENSE is still missing a number of things, do you look > at my email when I went through the repos and listed what was > contained in them? I know things have changed a little in > tadpole/larval repos but everythink

Re: incubator-mynewt-larva git commit: Updated version of system_stm32f4xx with more permissive license.

Hi, Would it be correct to assume this is a different version of the file by STMicroelectronics issued under a different license by them? Thanks, Justin > On 20 Feb 2016, at 9:55 am, ccoll...@apache.org wrote: > > Repository: incubator-mynewt-larva > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master

Re: LICENSE and NOTICE contents / headers

Hi, > OK, thanks for the heads up. Is this something we should deal with > immediately, or can we fix it between now and our next release? Best to fix now IMO, otherwise the incubator release may not pass. I’d say the risk is low but it’s there. That being said an incubating release doesn’t

Re: LICENSE and NOTICE contents / headers

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 09:05:58AM +1100, Justin Mclean wrote: > > The rest of them are from files which contain the Apache license text at > > the top of the file. In these files, we retained the original copyright > > notice below the Apache license. Do you think this is problematic? > >

Re: LICENSE and NOTICE contents / headers

Hi, > The rest of them are from files which contain the Apache license text at > the top of the file. In these files, we retained the original copyright > notice below the Apache license. Do you think this is problematic? That's incorrect.while you can license the whole as Apache, each file

Re: LICENSE and NOTICE contents / headers

Thanks a lot for looking at this, Justin. On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 06:16:22PM +1100, Justin Mclean wrote: > Newt repo still has: > ./.git/hooks/pre-rebase.sample I believe this file is not actually in the repository. When a git repo is cloned, the .git directory is populated with the contents of

Re: [BLE] Questions about BLE on Apache Mynewt

Hi Quang, No problem, that's exciting! Documentation on Mynewt is located here: http://mynewt.incubator.apache.org/documentation/ It's good that you're working on the Nordic platform, we've spent a lot of time supporting that chip. We are currently in the middle of our first beta -- if

Re: Release dependant on LGPL

On 2/19/16 6:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Greg Stein wrote: ...Speaking as an IPMC Member, and a Mynewt Mentor … yes, this is fine with a disclaimer in the release notes Except we don't have a standard for release notes, so how

Re: Release dependant on LGPL

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > ...Speaking as an IPMC Member, and a Mynewt Mentor … yes, this is fine with a > disclaimer in the release notes Except we don't have a standard for release notes, so how about we require a mention in the DISCLAIMER file

Re: Release dependant on LGPL

I would say that for this single request and this single release, a one-time exception is warranted. > On Feb 15, 2016, at 6:01 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > > I agree that an incubating release does not need to be fully compliant with > the proscription against