Thanks for all of the great feedback on the Java EE 8 support for Apache
NetBeans thus far. I have updated the README to direct individuals to
install the "Oracle JS Parser" and "nbjavac" after building and running the
IDE using a new userdir. Once completed, the IDE should allow one to add
Glas
Hi Gj,
Can you confirm that if we don’t modify source that we can just build, package
a distribute?
Kind regards,
Kirk
> On May 30, 2019, at 2:38 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>
> Yeah, I could be wrong. Maybe rebranding is not needed if indeed the binary
> is made from unmodified sources.
>
Thanks for the update Jose...I appreciate it. Let me know if you run into
issues creating new Java EE 8 projects or deploying to GlassFish 5, GlassFish
5.0.1, or GlassFish 5.1
Josh Juneau
juneau...@gmail.com
http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
https://www.apress.com/us/search?query=Juneau
> On Ma
Problem solved the error just occurred with the latest code on master not
with the code on https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb110/nb110.html. I
will test my projects and keep you updated.
Jose.
El jue., 30 may. 2019 a las 14:49, Josh Juneau ()
escribió:
> Hi Jose,
>
> Thanks for testing! Di
Yeah, I could be wrong. Maybe rebranding is not needed if indeed the binary
is made from unmodified sources.
Gj
On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 23:11, Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2019, 23:02 Kodewerk, wrote:
>
> > I would personally prefer Apache-NetBeans… but I’ve been told that we
> > neede
On Thu, 30 May 2019, 23:02 Kodewerk, wrote:
> I would personally prefer Apache-NetBeans… but I’ve been told that we
> needed to rebrand.
>
Well, this is the thread I'm thinking of -
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/072862707d0c75ec72f474d696a1addd994055b0c5b7617d3c7403ca@%3Cdev.netbeans.apac
I would personally prefer Apache-NetBeans… but I’ve been told that we needed to
rebrand.
— Kirk
> On May 30, 2019, at 2:00 PM, Neil C Smith wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2019, 18:47 Kodewerk, wrote:
>
>> For example, I believe we can’t call the distro Apache-NetBeans so we’re
>> thinking of cal
On Thu, 30 May 2019, 18:47 Kodewerk, wrote:
> For example, I believe we can’t call the distro Apache-NetBeans so we’re
> thinking of calling it Adopt-NetBeans.
>
While l wouldn't want to stop use of Adopt NetBeans, because it sounds
great, I'm not sure you can't use Apache NetBeans. If I recall
Hi Jose,
Thanks for testing! Did you download a fresh copy of the Apache NetBeans 11.0
sources and overwrite the enterprise directory? It looks like you may have
duplicate modules in your directory. Perhaps delete the original enterprise
directory and then copy the Java EE 8 supported enterp
Hey Matthias,
Once last thing since I'm a newbie at this..
Since you approved the changes, do I need to do anything else on my end to
get it merged into the tree?
-brad w.
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:17 PM Matthias Bläsing
wrote:
> Hi Brad,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 30.05.2019, 11:37 -0600 schrie
Hi Josh,
Thank you for your work!
I followed the instructions but I get this error:
BUILD FAILED
/home/user/Apps/Development/netbeans-master/nbbuild/build.xml:193:
java.io.IOException: Duplicated module org.netbeans.modules.j2ee.jboss4:
found in /home/user/Apps/Development/netbeans-master/contri
Adopt Netbeans is fine. Because of those developers who want php support
only or html/js.
+1
On Thu, May 30, 2019, 20:32 Josh Juneau wrote:
> I love the idea of the Adopt project distributing NetBeans as
> "Adopt-NetBeans". The AdoptOpenJDK page makes it easy for newcomers to get
> started...a
Hi Brad,
Am Donnerstag, den 30.05.2019, 11:37 -0600 schrieb Brad Walker:
> I submitted a pull request today..
>
> https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1272
>
> It seems like the Travis build server is "stuck" waiting for my build job
> to get queued..
>
> As a newbie, I'm just curious to kno
I submitted a pull request today..
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1272
It seems like the Travis build server is "stuck" waiting for my build job
to get queued..
As a newbie, I'm just curious to know if I'm missing something or is it
really stuck in the queue..
Thanks for any insight..
I love the idea of the Adopt project distributing NetBeans as
"Adopt-NetBeans". The AdoptOpenJDK page makes it easy for newcomers to get
started...and even easier with NetBeans as an option.
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:29 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> “Adopt NetBeans” would not only be a name, i
“Adopt NetBeans” would not only be a name, it would also be a ‘call to
action’. :-)
Gj
On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 19:23, Matthias Bläsing
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 30.05.2019, 09:46 -0700 schrieb Kodewerk:
> > The Adopt project would like to distribute NetBeans but we’ve yet to
> > sort o
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 30.05.2019, 09:46 -0700 schrieb Kodewerk:
> The Adopt project would like to distribute NetBeans but we’ve yet to
> sort out what is needed to make that happen. For example, I believe
> we can’t call the distro Apache-NetBeans so we’re thinking of calling
> it Adopt-NetBeans.
As someone who grew up in South Africa, I think it would be awesome if
there’d be a Zulu IDE, bundled with the Zulu JDK (rebranded and with a few
Zulu-specific modules). :-)
Gj
On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 18:44, Josh Juneau wrote:
> I have been using Azul Zulu JDK for a while now with no issues. Ve
How about downloading the JDK as a step in the installer? Then any distribution
could be added to that list by the community with a PR request and no license
issues will be needed to solve.
Best regards,
Eduardo Quintanilla
Software Developer
-Original Message-
From: Josh Juneau
Sent:
Hi all,
The Adopt project would like to distribute NetBeans but we’ve yet to sort out
what is needed to make that happen. For example, I believe we can’t call the
distro Apache-NetBeans so we’re thinking of calling it Adopt-NetBeans. This
implies that there a number of things we need to alter a
I have been using Azul Zulu JDK for a while now with no issues. Very
simple zip to extract. +1 for targeting Zulu as the free OpenJDK for use.
However, I'm not sure if we could necessarily "Package" it with Apache
NetBeans. If there is an OpenJDK that would be acceptable for packaging
along with
I have added https://github.com/apache/netbeans-website/pull/368 to fix 2
gremlins I introduced and include Antonio’s suggestions.
Kind Regards,
MArk
>
>> On 24 May 2019, at 18:38, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>>
>> Bottom of the page you should see that you can edit the page live on GitHub.
>>
The other problem with .ZIP is that it doesn't preserve permissions bits
for *nix, breaking Maven and several other built-in tools.
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 11:55 AM mike james
wrote:
> Hi
> I'm new so tell me if I'm doing something wrong/odd.
>
> Can I just say that while experienced programmers
OK, which one?
Gj
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:36 PM mike james
wrote:
> Yes go for the installer - important to get new users no question about it.
> And I follow about licencing problem (sometimes I think FOSS licensing is
> also too confusing for mortals).
> But - at least pick one and include
This is probably an enhancement request or an activity for a future time but
with the more recent changes in Java I seem to recall with the jlink and/or
jpackage coming that it is possible to no longer require a JDK directly be
installed but build a package with a subset of items for inclusion i
Yes go for the installer - important to get new users no question about it.
And I follow about licencing problem (sometimes I think FOSS licensing is
also too confusing for mortals).
But - at least pick one and include instructions on how to install it.
It doesn't have to be the best or have anythi
NetBeans runs on JDK 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12.
But that's not the point in this discussion. The discussion is about
installers -- and just to save some time here, we cannot bundle the JDK
with NetBeans into an installer and then distribute that installer from
Apache because the JDK is GPL licensed, wh
Hi guys, great job. I follow, but not too good at helping (yet).
JDK 8 would be a good idea I think. Build up asap to latest.Do many use wrote:
OK, let's target beginners. Hmmm which JDK should we focus on? How do
we decide? There's no way to decide, we cannot decide for beginners or
a
OK, let's target beginners. Hmmm which JDK should we focus on? How do
we decide? There's no way to decide, we cannot decide for beginners or
anyone else which JDK they should use. No other tool or IDE can do that
either.
Gj
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 4:07 PM mike james
wrote:
> See I told you
See I told you it was confusing.
I know I'm going on about beginners a lot but you really do need to target
them.
You have got the experienced seasoned user and they aren't going anywhere
unless
there is a really good reason but the future is in the beginner. If they go
off to IntelliJ, Eclipse or
Use the version "Next" in JIRA
On 5/30/19 5:06 AM, Svata Dedic wrote:
Hi,
I want to ask - how should we mark issues which are intended to be
solved in NetBeans 11.1 ?
Right now, I have:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2361
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2565
ht
But there's several more, e.g., off the top of my head, Pivotal has one and
there's also JetBrains Runtime.
Gj
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 3:28 PM Eduardo Quintanilla
wrote:
> I would recommend reading the Java Is Still Free document
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nFGazvrCvHMZJgFstlbzoHjpA
I would recommend reading the Java Is Still Free document
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nFGazvrCvHMZJgFstlbzoHjpAVwv5DEdnaBr_5pKuHo/edit?usp=sharing
From that document
Free Builds for Linux, Windows, Mac, etc. [OpenJDK, no commercial support]:
AdoptOpenJDK (commercial support also availab
Hi,
I want to ask - how should we mark issues which are intended to be
solved in NetBeans 11.1 ?
Right now, I have:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2361
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2565
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2577
Two of them are alrea
It is exactly this sort of confusion that makes it tougher for beginners to
get started.
I tried to help a beginner recently and I got confuse too :-)
If I remember correctly the old installer checked for an installation and
told you want to do if it didn't find one.
I think the current installer i
Sure, though the question will be 'which JDK'. :-) There's about a dozen of
them right now.
Gj
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:52 PM Patrick Musembi
wrote:
> Can we also provide a link for downloading jdk if there is no jdk installed
> mainly because of non-java developers.
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019,
Can we also provide a link for downloading jdk if there is no jdk installed
mainly because of non-java developers.
On Thu, May 30, 2019, 13:22 Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Excellent, thank you for this feedback.
>
> More from others, welcome.
>
> Gj
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 11:55 AM mike james
Excellent, thank you for this feedback.
More from others, welcome.
Gj
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 11:55 AM mike james
wrote:
> Hi
> I'm new so tell me if I'm doing something wrong/odd.
>
> Can I just say that while experienced programmers have no problems with
> "unzip this" and so on
> NetBeans i
Hi
I'm new so tell me if I'm doing something wrong/odd.
Can I just say that while experienced programmers have no problems with
"unzip this" and so on
NetBeans is a very attractive IDE for the complete beginner and an
installer lowers the barrier to
them getting started with NetBeans in particular
AFAIK, no work has ever been done for C# and F#.
You'd need to start from scratch to create that, best would be to start
with a feature request outline, which you could add here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Feature+Request+Outlines
Gj
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:59 AM H
40 matches
Mail list logo