+1
- build runs clean, and successful
- verified the checksum and the signature
Thanks for your had work!
Kai
On 11/27/2019 4:21 PM, Neil C Smith wrote:
Dear all,
This is the voting candidate for the 11.2 update 1 release of Apache
NetBeans. This release is identical to 11.2 except for backp
Apache rules do not go well with end user applications such as NetBeans IDE.
The binary zip could be used as a baseline for building the installers
and this fact itself gives it more legitimacy / security.
OpenBeans could also distribute 'vanilla' NetBeans installers bundling
AdoptOpenJDK. There'
OFF TOPIC
I used
wget -r -nH --cut-dirs=6
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/netbeans/netbeans/11.2-u1/nbms
to fetch the individual artifacts. I expected to see only the nbms
directory. I was surprised to see
$ ls
index.html netbeans-11.2-u1-source.zip
netbeans-11.2-u1-so
+1
Using Win7, jdk1.8
Went through the checklist. While testing [NETBEANS-3257] ran into some
exceptions (couldn't use Go to Symbol on test project), which also
happened on 11.2. Filed [NETBEANS-3475].
-ernie
On 11/27/2019 7:21 AM, Neil C Smith wrote:
Dear all,
This is the voting candida
+1 (binding)
- Checked jar files
- Verified the checksum and the signature
- BUILD SUCCESSFUL
- Verified that [NETBEANS-3335] and [NETBEANS-3290] have been fixed
- [NETBEANS-3257] I could rename a java method
Thanks a lot for the work,
Junichi
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 12:21 AM Neil C Smith wrot
On 11/27/2019 3:11 PM, Neil C Smith wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, 22:56 Ernie Rael, wrote:
Is the "nbms/" or "nbms/java" intended?
Yes, [snip]
Actually, I was wondering about the relative path, but I don't really
know how these signatures are supposed to be used. Getting the stuff
with "wg
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, 22:56 Ernie Rael, wrote:
> Is the "nbms/" or "nbms/java" intended?
>
Yes, although it's normally ./nbms/java etc. Don't think lack of ./ causes
a problem? I had to do them manually post-signing rather than using the
ones from the build.
Best wishes,
Neil
>
All the sha512 signatures are of the form
...4d31bc720f637 nbms/updates.xml
Is the "nbms/" or "nbms/java" intended?
-ernie
On 11/27/2019 7:21 AM, Neil C Smith wrote:
Dear all,
This is the voting candidate for the 11.2 update 1 release of Apache
NetBeans. This release is identical to 11.2
If it is helpful, I would be willing to help with this endeavor!
-brad w.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 3:08 PM Neil C Smith wrote:
>
> Would it help in getting C/C++ support in too? Or is that waiting for
> 12.1?
>
>
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:23 PM Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 20:13, Emilian Bold wrote:
> > An exe installer would be a derivative work imho even if it bundles
> > the same bits.
> >
> > Calling that installer NetBeans based on nominative fair user seems an
> > interesting angle
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 13:47, Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, 13:33 Eric Barboni, wrote:
>>
>>Can we shift by a month the schedule of xx.3 eventually whiteout messing
>> quarterly release ? Allowing maybe more volunteers (me for example :D )
>
>
> Given problems with 11.2 related to
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 19:41, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
> I do not think that after this discussion we would get the exception
> from the board Geertjan might try to bring it up there as well.
Well, we'll see. I personally have serious misgivings about ASF's
current position on "platform" dependenc
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 20:13, Emilian Bold wrote:
> An exe installer would be a derivative work imho even if it bundles
> the same bits.
>
> Calling that installer NetBeans based on nominative fair user seems an
> interesting angle.
I think it's a major stretch to call the installer derivative.
+1
Validated:
- checksum for source zip is correct
- contents of source is identical with repository brach release112
as of commit d54c01082b55 (differences are contrib, git directories
and LICENSE file). The differenes are expected
- signature of the binaries validates
- build runs clean
- t
> However, we can certainly have build scripts that have optional flags
> that allow anyone building from the source release to include either
> of those things for themselves. That's no different to providing the
> option for a binary consumer to install at runtime. And means we
> don't all have
I would be in favor of continuing as we have been doing -- providing an
installer that assumes a JDK is available. Not bundling a JDK is not the
end of the world though yes inconvenient and I don't think we should throw
out the baby with the bathwater.
Gj
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 8:41 PM Laszlo Ki
Dear all,
It is a great burden to us to provide the best out-of-the-box install
experience with NetBeans. That would mean, providing an installer with
JDK, nb-javac probably javafx.
See the threads:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a3e6051130e18aae3f7a81c562a63ac96d3a3a07d4bcbee074392d59
+1 (binding), did the above listed checks, tried to reproduce some of the
related issues before/after including the update 1 release and couldn’t
reproduce after including the update. Thanks a lot for this work.
Gj
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 16:21, Neil C Smith wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> This is the vo
Awesome! Worked like a champ after the update using that update center link
you provided.
Thanks!
Mark Claassen
Senior Software Engineer
Donnell Systems, Inc.
130 South Main Street
Leighton Plaza Suite 375
South Bend, IN 46601
E-mail: mailto:mclaas...@ocie.net
Voice: (574)232-3784
Fax: (574)2
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 17:30, Emilian Bold wrote:
> I don't see what I'm doing as splitting the effort. If anything it's
> complementary. Can NetBeans bundle a JDK? Can it bundle nbjavac?
Depends what you mean! Can we bundle either in our binaries - at the
moment, no, although there is still an
> > I didn't mean to involve you too much with this, just curious if my
> > patch made sense. I certainly don't want to split the efforts under
> > NetBeans.
>
> I think that was meant that you doing it separately is splitting the
> effort! Ideally something to solve here.
I don't see what I'm do
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 16:06, Mark A. Claassen wrote:
> Wow. The Netbeans community is pretty great! I will wait for the updated
> daily builds to refresh and give it a try.
The daily builds should have been fixed a few days ago, but you could
also try adding the temporary update centre in the
Wow. The Netbeans community is pretty great! I will wait for the updated
daily builds to refresh and give it a try.
Mark Claassen
Senior Software Engineer
Donnell Systems, Inc.
130 South Main Street
Leighton Plaza Suite 375
South Bend, IN 46601
E-mail: mailto:mclaas...@ocie.net
Voice: (574)23
Dear all,
I might be caught up a bit with some LaF works recently. I'm working on
creating two color schemes (a light and a dark) based on:
https://github.com/morhetz/gruvbox/
My question is: where to put it? They are a bunch of xml files and one
property file.
Options:
1. IDE Defaults mo
Dear all,
This is the voting candidate for the 11.2 update 1 release of Apache
NetBeans. This release is identical to 11.2 except for backported
fixes for -
[NETBEANS-3257] Fixed issue on refactoring rename of java method (and
potentially other nb-javac issues)
[NETBEANS-3335] Enhance robustness
Actually I've seen that when I added the dark LAF to the build.
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1651/commits/05d9e9fa9e6eaa343c9012bf3745567299c8acaf
build.xml was the fix for that, however only the fixed working version
were ever merged to the master.
But master builds fine for Travis
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 14:01, joe foe wrote:
>
> This is known problem with 11.2 . See NETBEANS-3290 in netbeans JiRA.
>
> Alternative is to use 11.1 .
I am literally as I type pushing the update that should fix this for
11.2 via SVN for update vote. Once that is done, your feedback during
the
This is known problem with 11.2 . See NETBEANS-3290 in netbeans JiRA.
Alternative is to use 11.1 .
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, 14:58 Mark A. Claassen, wrote:
> I wrote a plugin for a VCS system that we use called AccuRev. I wrote
> this for Netbeans version 7. Because I used some internal APIs and
I wrote a plugin for a VCS system that we use called AccuRev. I wrote this for
Netbeans version 7. Because I used some internal APIs and was not a "friend"
of some modules, I needed to recompile it for every version. However, to
Netbeans credit, I have always been able to do that without chan
Dear members of Apache NetBeans community.
I want to call a vote on releasing Apache NetBeans utilities
nb-repository-plugin version 1.5
This is an Apache Maven plugin that help populating a maven repository with
Apache NetBeans materials.
This what we use to populate the maven artefacts t
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 08:26, Emilian Bold wrote:
> I didn't mean to involve you too much with this, just curious if my
> patch made sense. I certainly don't want to split the efforts under
> NetBeans.
I think that was meant that you doing it separately is splitting the
effort! Ideally something
Hi all,
I have started seeing this error after updating to the latest git master
and running `ant` or `ant build-basic`:
> ...\netbeans\nbbuild\build.xml:660: Target "all-o.n.swing.laf.dark" does
not exist in the project "nbbuild". It is used from target
"nbmerge-build-one-cluster".
Has anyone else
I didn't mean to involve you too much with this, just curious if my
patch made sense. I certainly don't want to split the efforts under
NetBeans.
It would be great if there was a single flag in the canonical build
that would include nb-javac but it doesn't seem obvious to me how...
Especially cons
33 matches
Mail list logo
