Re: Pull the plug from Java 8 in 12.1?

Hi, Two comments: -I know some people that have NetBeans platform application, and target JDK 8. I hope they'll comment here. -regarding JDK 11 and (nb-)javac - while the Java editing using JDK 11's javac is possible, I think it still leaves a lot to be desired (for example, IIRC, there were some

Re: Pull the plug from Java 8 in 12.1?

+1 to drop Support for Java 8 in NetBeans 12.1. If someone still wants to run it on Java 8 he/she can use a previous release. Laszlo Kishalmi schrieb am Do., 27. Feb. 2020, 02:13: > Dear all, > > What do you think about stopping support Java 8 as NetBeans runtime from > 12.1 and on? > > Neil men

RE: Pull the plug from Java 8 in 12.1?

Agreed--as long as NetBeans itself can still work with Java 8 projects, I think it's a good idea to bump the required JDK version for building NetBeans itself. Myself, I've been working on a lot of HiDPI-related patches for NetBeans, and they must be tested with Java 9 or above. So I had to use

Re: Re: [VOTE] (Off Topic - Github Voting) Release Apache NetBeans 11.3 [vote candidate 2]

Off topic... Is there a way to raise a vote in github to track a vote in github context? And any -1 could if need reference and new tickets as needed? I saw this but wasn’t sure about it’s use https://vote.biglybt.com/isaacs/github Eric Bresie ebre...@gmail.com > On 2/21/20 10:32 AM, Eric Barb

Re: Pull the plug from Java 8 in 12.1?

+1, for removing Java 8 as NetBeans runtime in 12.1. Many of us still compile our code against Java 8 for Java EE projects, etc., but that should not prevent NetBeans runtime from moving forward. Josh Juneau juneau...@gmail.com http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com https://www.apress.com/us/search?

Re: Pull the plug from Java 8 in 12.1?

A decision long over-due. On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 5:13 PM Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: > Dear all, > > What do you think about stopping support Java 8 as NetBeans runtime from > 12.1 and on? > > Neil mentioned it in the user's chat first regarding that we have issues > with nb-javac from time to time.

Pull the plug from Java 8 in 12.1?

Dear all, What do you think about stopping support Java 8 as NetBeans runtime from 12.1 and on? Neil mentioned it in the user's chat first regarding that we have issues with nb-javac from time to time. As we know our mid term plan is/was to rely on javac tooling instead of habing to mainta

Re: Profiling method calls does not work with JDK newer than 1.8

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 26.02.2020, 21:00 + schrieb Peter Hull: > As I understand it, we need to build the native interface (DLL/SO) on > every platform we support, zip them up into > profiler-external-binaries-8.2.zip (or -12 I guess!) then upload to > netbeans.osuosl.org/binaries, and finally u

Re: Profiling method calls does not work with JDK newer than 1.8

On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 20:00, Matthias Bläsing wrote: > ok - I'll aks the obvious question: Why try to squeze a pointer sized > type into a int sized type? Why not use a jlong? I've been back and forth on this one - I actually implemented it both ways. I went for mapping jmethodID to jint because

Re: Profiling method calls does not work with JDK newer than 1.8

On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 19:42, Matteo Di Giovinazzo wrote: > I found the whole thread and I see you found a solution: NB 12.0 might be a > good occasion to get this sorted out. Agreed, I have been a bit quiet recently because I was waiting for all the 11.3 stuff to settle down. > I see in one of yo

Re: Profiling method calls does not work with JDK newer than 1.8

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 26.02.2020, 12:42 -0700 schrieb Matteo Di Giovinazzo: > Thanks Peter! I closed 3896 as a duplicate of 1428. > > I found the whole thread and I see you found a solution: NB 12.0 > might be a > good occasion to get this sorted out. I see in one of your last > comments > [1] you

Re: Profiling method calls does not work with JDK newer than 1.8

Thanks Peter! I closed 3896 as a duplicate of 1428. I found the whole thread and I see you found a solution: NB 12.0 might be a good occasion to get this sorted out. I see in one of your last comments [1] you were stuck on integrating the fix in NetBeans infrastructure build. I guess I can try to

RE: Latest Version of NetBeans Platform?

For my NetBeans Platform application, I usually maintain my own private branch based on the latest NetBeans release (currently 11.3), and build it myself. That allows me to add my own patches as needed, which I then contribute upstream after testing them in my platform app for some time. (I also

Re: Profiling method calls does not work with JDK newer than 1.8

On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 18:39, Matteo Di Giovinazzo wrote: > > Profiling method calls does not work with JDK newer than 1.8 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-3896 It is the same as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1428 I think. -

Profiling method calls does not work with JDK newer than 1.8

Hi, since the NB 12.0 merge window is open, I would strongly suggest to have this fixed by 12.0: Profiling method calls does not work with JDK newer than 1.8 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-3896 Thanks! -- Matteo Di Giovinazzo

Re: Latest Version of NetBeans Platform?

The right one is 112. On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, 11:34 AM Tim Mullé wrote: > Hi, > > I’d like to start developing on the NetBeans Platform and am curious what > exactly is the latest version? Which Netbeans IDE version should I use? > 8.2? 11.2? > > If I download NetBeans 11.2 and create a new “NetBe

Re: Latest Version of NetBeans Platform?

On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 17:34, Tim Mullé wrote: > I’d like to start developing on the NetBeans Platform and am curious what > exactly is the latest version? 11.3. It's released but not been announced yet - takes a few days for everything to be updated. > If I download NetBeans 11.2 and create a

Re: Latest Version of NetBeans Platform?

Thanks.. I also downloaded the latest 11.3 beta today and tried to create a new NB Platform Application and the splash/about screens still show “Apache NetBeans Platform 10” I’d like to support people running on JDK8 and JDK11+ with my NB RCP applications.. But I also don’t want to miss out on

Re: Latest Version of NetBeans Platform?

The latest version I am aware of is 11.3 https://github.com/apache/netbeans/releases/tag/11.3 Michele Costabile michele.costab...@gmail.com > Il giorno 26 feb 2020, alle ore 18:34, Tim Mullé ha > scritto: > > Hi, > > I’d like to start developing on the NetBeans Platform and am curious what

Latest Version of NetBeans Platform?

Hi, I’d like to start developing on the NetBeans Platform and am curious what exactly is the latest version? Which Netbeans IDE version should I use? 8.2? 11.2? If I download NetBeans 11.2 and create a new “NetBeans Platform Application” and run it and look at the “About” dialog.. it tells me

Re: archetype for javafx maven

On 2/25/20 6:25 PM, Ernie Rael wrote: > On 2/25/2020 3:13 PM, Glenn Holmer wrote: >> On 2/25/20 4:56 PM, Ernie Rael wrote: >>> Once it's in the local, you can use the "maven project from archetype", >>> not sure why it needs to be in local first. >> When I run the above command, it works; after tha

Re: archetype for javafx maven

My primary concern is having something that works out of the box on NB-12; and note that both maven and javafx are shown as goals for that release. Neil's suggestion of a standard way to expose common actions certainly makes sense. And Gj's proposed API change to allow adding nbactions.xml as

RE: Creating a GitHub pull request error code 500

Yes, it is happening to me too. URL: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/compare/master...oyarzun:NETBEANS-3332?expand=1 "Looks like something went wrong! We track these errors automatically, but if the problem persists feel free to contact us. In the meantime, try refreshing." Eduardo Quinta

Re: archetype for javafx maven

On Wed, 26 Feb 2020, 14:50 Ernie Rael, wrote: > On 2/26/2020 12:52 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > The preferred approach is still to not fork -- and there is now movement > in > > the PR: > > > > https://github.com/openjfx/javafx-maven-archetypes/pull/8 > > > > So my preference would be to cont

Re: Features page for 11.3

On 2/26/20 3:25 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > When we release 11.3, here's the features page we'll make available with > the highlights drawn from our Wiki: > > https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb113/index.html > > It's not completely complete and I'm adding more content continually -- > how

Creating a GitHub pull request error code 500

Is anyone else having an issue creating a pull request to apache/netbeans from their fork? I'm trying to create a pull request for this branch https://github.com/oyarzun/netbeans/tree/NETBEANS-3332 I keep getting a 500 error code when it redirects to the compare page. I've also created a GitHub

Re: archetype for javafx maven

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-3104 Gj On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 3:50 PM Ernie Rael wrote: > On 2/26/2020 12:52 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > The preferred approach is still to not fork -- and there is now movement > in > > the PR: > > > > https://github.com/openjfx/javafx-mave

Re: [NOTICE] Apache NetBeans 12.0 merge windows OPEN

Looks like a dup of this, already merged:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-3903Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device Original message From: Enrico Olivelli Date: 2/26/20 2:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: dev@netbeans.apache.org Subject: Re: [NOTICE] Apache NetBeans 12.0 mer

Re: archetype for javafx maven

On 2/26/2020 12:52 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: The preferred approach is still to not fork -- and there is now movement in the PR: https://github.com/openjfx/javafx-maven-archetypes/pull/8 So my preference would be to continue to focus on not forking What about nbactions.xml? -ernie --

Re: Features page for 11.3

Looks great Geertjan, thanks! Josh Juneau juneau...@gmail.com http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com https://www.apress.com/us/search?query=Juneau On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 3:25 AM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Hi all, > > When we release 11.3,

RE: Features page for 11.3

Yep good catch. FlatLaf is only integrated Eric -Message d'origine- De : Alessandro Envoyé : mercredi 26 février 2020 11:44 À : dev@netbeans.apache.org Objet : Re: Features page for 11.3 Hi Gertjan, had a quick look to the features page and it looks good. Only thing is in the Appe

Re: Features page for 11.3

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:44 AM Alessandro wrote: > Hi Gertjan, >had a quick look to the features page and it looks good. > Only thing is in the Appearance section it's said that FlatLaf was donated > but I don't think it is correct. > > Many thanks, made those changes! It would be great t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans VisualStudio Code Extension for Java 0.0.1 [vote candidate 1]

+1 Gj On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:38 PM Eric Barboni wrote: > +1 > > The hash is missing but it's: > e9111499a7b3d71fce5496a633116574f617067b > > Best Regards > Eric > -Message d'origine- > De : Jaroslav Tulach > Envoyé : lundi 24 février 2020 13:19 > À : dev > Objet : Re: [VOTE] Relea

Re: Features page for 11.3

Looks awesome! Great job! Thanks! Kai On 2/26/2020 10:25 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: Hi all, When we release 11.3, here's the features page we'll make available with the highlights drawn from our Wiki: https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb113/index.html It's not completely complete and

Re: Features page for 11.3

Nice work. On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, 13:44 Alessandro wrote: > Hi Gertjan, >had a quick look to the features page and it looks good. > Only thing is in the Appearance section it's said that FlatLaf was donated > but I don't think it is correct. > > I would reword that sentence as: > A strong foc

Re: Adding vuejs support using language server

Currently digging through the internet. I'll share my findings here maybe I could help someone since this support is highly requested by netbeans users. Thank you On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, 15:27 Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > On Twitter you also got a pointer from Chris. > > Gj > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 a

cleaning git/jenkins

Hi, As part of cleanup after release I want to remove the tag that are non-released 11.3-vc2,11.3-vc1,11.3-beta3,2,1 only 11.3 to be kept. I also will clean Jenkins build that were conserved to setup vote and beta artefacts. Memory of tags are here for 11.3: https://github.com/apache/net

Re: Adding vuejs support using language server

On Twitter you also got a pointer from Chris. Gj On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 13:24, Patrick Musembi wrote: > Thanks for the pointer, I will be very grateful > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, 11:43 Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > > There was a session on this topic at FOSDEM in February this year, the > > vide

Re: Adding vuejs support using language server

Thanks for the pointer, I will be very grateful On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, 11:43 Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > There was a session on this topic at FOSDEM in February this year, the > video is being worked on and when it is ready, should be soon, will let you > know. > > Gj > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 6

RE: new jira project for NetBeans infra

It can be done by you only (as PMC of NetBeans) or by asking infra Eric -Message d'origine- De : Sven Reimers Envoyé : mercredi 26 février 2020 12:36 À : dev Objet : Re: new jira project for NetBeans infra +1 -Sven Geertjan Wielenga schrieb am Mi., 26. Feb. 2020, 12:09: > It make

Re: new jira project for NetBeans infra

+1 -Sven Geertjan Wielenga schrieb am Mi., 26. Feb. 2020, 12:09: > It makes sense to me. Do we need infra to set this up or can we do this > ourselves? > > Gj > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 11:54, Eric Barboni wrote: > > > Hi, > > I have to persist, for my sanity. > > > > Still want a new jira

Re: new jira project for NetBeans infra

It makes sense to me. Do we need infra to set this up or can we do this ourselves? Gj On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 11:54, Eric Barboni wrote: > Hi, > I have to persist, for my sanity. > > Still want a new jira subproject for all infra stuff for NetBeans :D > > Eric > > > -Message d'origine-

RE: new jira project for NetBeans infra

Hi, I have to persist, for my sanity. Still want a new jira subproject for all infra stuff for NetBeans :D Eric -Message d'origine- De : Eric Barboni Envoyé : jeudi 20 février 2020 13:54 À : dev@netbeans.apache.org Objet : new jira project for NetBeans infra Hi, I wonder if we can

Re: Features page for 11.3

Hi Gertjan, had a quick look to the features page and it looks good. Only thing is in the Appearance section it's said that FlatLaf was donated but I don't think it is correct. I would reword that sentence as: A strong focus of the 11.3 release is around appearance, since the NetBeans dark look

Re: compatibility with dark look and feel

Hi Ernie, the usual way to handle the choice of colors is to use UIManager.getColor("laf_color_name") and choose a suitable "laf_color_name". Every LAF define a set of color names, there are some basic ones (e.g. selection, text, shadow, button face, etc.) and some widget specific ones (e.g. butt

Re: [NOTICE] Apache NetBeans 12.0 merge windows OPEN

On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 14:27, Eric Barboni wrote: > All post release commits are done (sigtests and spec version increments). > Consider master mergeable again. Great job! > I'm up to do release manager another round but any volunteer welcome. +1 In my opinion, it would make a lot of sense for

Features page for 11.3

Hi all, When we release 11.3, here's the features page we'll make available with the highlights drawn from our Wiki: https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb113/index.html It's not completely complete and I'm adding more content continually -- however, feedback is needed and especially if you've

RE: [NOTICE] Apache NetBeans 12.0 merge windows OPEN

Hi Enrico, You are welcome to do so. Best is to add 12.00 milestone on PR. Regards Eric -Message d'origine- De : Enrico Olivelli Envoyé : mercredi 26 février 2020 08:06 À : dev@netbeans.apache.org Objet : Re: [NOTICE] Apache NetBeans 12.0 merge windows OPEN Eric, I have filed this iss

Re: archetype for javafx maven

The preferred approach is still to not fork -- and there is now movement in the PR: https://github.com/openjfx/javafx-maven-archetypes/pull/8 So my preference would be to continue to focus on not forking -- however, now that Ernie's solution is available, we could use it from the "Maven Project f

Re: building CND

Yes, these are some of the files listed in Jan's instructions. It will be good to catch anything that there is in addition to what Jan describes, to make his instructions as complete as possible. Gj On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 9:48 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > I get the message: > > -do-compile: > [

Re: building CND

I get the message: -do-compile:  [nb-javac] Compiling 70 source files to /home/legine/workspace/netbeans/cnd/cnd.utils/build/classes    [repeat] /home/legine/workspace/netbeans/cnd/cnd.utils/src/org/netbeans/modules/cnd/utils/MIMEExtensions.java:224: error: Cannot find resource org/netbeans/m

Re: [DISCUSS] Wrapping up Oracle's donation of NetBeans to Apache

Yes, I think if the CND work Jan has done would be available in a branch or some repo at Apache, that would help a lot and we'd have a centralized starting point. Gj On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 5:39 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hi all > > Does it make sense to create a separate donation repository? May

Re: Adding vuejs support using language server

There was a session on this topic at FOSDEM in February this year, the video is being worked on and when it is ready, should be soon, will let you know. Gj On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 6:38 AM Patrick Musembi wrote: > Hello everyone, how am I supposed to add language under netbeans? I have > syntax

Re: building CND

To help people to help you, please provide the error message or some kind of clues about what it is specifically that you're missing in the build? Gj On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 9:18 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Okay I merged your cnd branch into my repo. Still not build able thought. > > I do understa

Re: building CND

Okay I merged your cnd branch into my repo. Still not build able thought. I do understand it correctly that I still need to move some files as described in your readme? Building To build the C/C++ support, please copy the following files from the original NetBeans reposi