Hi Laszlo,
It will probably be at the weekend when I can do the Mac installer. But
yeah I've no problem doing it.
My main concern here and the reason for my -1 is that there seems to be a
push for a convince binary without knowing if the main vote passes. If it
doesn't then it's a waste of time a
Noticed a regression from 12.1: the new Java 15 nb-javac fails to parse
code using "permits" as an identifier (not uncommon in code related to
semaphores, for example). Reported as
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-5055
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 12:06 AM Laszlo Kishalmi
wrote:
> Dear
Following up on my self, it seems that calling a command programmatically
wont be possible after all since the LSP classes are module private.
Is there a workaround for this?
Cheers.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 9:15 PM Randamuna Namae wrote:
> Hello dear community,
>
> I'm working on integrating Ap
Hello dear community,
I'm working on integrating Apache NetBeans with Scala's LSP server and got
the basics working.
The problem I'm facing is that after starting the LSP client and
initialization is done with the Scala LSP Server, I need to send a command
to it programmatically so that it does a
Well, I plan to close the VOTING round for 12.2 source Tomorrow morning
PST (That would be Tomorrow late afternoon in Europe). After that is out
I'd start a round for the Window and Linux binaries, also I'd ask John
to prepare the Mac binary. That would be the right time to start the VS
Code bi
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020, 21:01 Jaroslav Tulach,
wrote:
> It is my understanding that finishing source vote and only then starting
> vote
> on complementary binaries is not Apache policy, just a NetBeans project
> habit.
>
Not always, or by design - concurrency is hard! ;-)
Neil
>
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020, 20:01 John Mc, wrote:
> -1
>
> Votes on convenience binaries should surely wait to see if the parent
> project vote passes imo.
>
We often have voting in parallel, just this, like others, would be
dependent on the main vote passing.
Best wishes,
Neil
>
> Well, it would have been nicer to wait the close of the 12.2 vote. I
> know it seems to be a matter of formality by now, but still..
The best time to object was on Thursday when I described the plan to vote in
parallel:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
r2c456e2ae9cde981e2027c9ac65ec9e6244
+1 (binding)
* verified SHA512 (netbeans-12.2-bin.zip, netbeans-12.2-source.zip,
netbeans-platform-12.2-bin.zip, netbeans-platform-12.2-source.zip)
* verified ASC (netbeans-12.2-bin.zip, netbeans-12.2-source.zip,
netbeans-platform-12.2-bin.zip, netbeans-platform-12.2-source.zip)
* NOTICE
-1
Votes on convenience binaries should surely wait to see if the parent
project vote passes imo.
Regards
John
On Mon 23 Nov 2020, 18:58 Laszlo Kishalmi,
wrote:
> Well, it would have been nicer to wait the close of the 12.2 vote. I
> know it seems to be a matter of formality by now, but still
+1
Product Version: Apache NetBeans IDE 12.2
Java: 15; OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 15+36
Runtime: OpenJDK Runtime Environment 15+36
System: Windows 10 Pro version 2004 64Bit; UTF-8; en_US
Kai
On 11/21/2020 9:06 AM, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
Dear community,
This is our second voting candidate for t
+1
- verified sha512 and asc signatures for sources and convenience binaries
- verified LICENSE and NOTICE
- sources don't contain any other .jar files than mentioned
- built on Ubuntu 20.10 with JDK 1.8.0_275
Tested both built NetBeans and convenience binaries
- opened PHP project - navigation,
Well, it would have been nicer to wait the close of the 12.2 vote. I
know it seems to be a matter of formality by now, but still..
Also it would have been really nice to start a new [VOTE] thread instead
of messing with the original 12.2 one.
On 11/23/20 8:52 AM, Martin Balin wrote:
Dear com
+1
built with openjdk 11.0.9.1 2020-11-04
runtime:
Product Version: Apache NetBeans IDE 12.2
Java: 15.0.1; OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 15.0.1+9-18
Runtime: OpenJDK Runtime Environment 15.0.1+9-18
System: Windows 10 version 10.0 running on amd64; Cp1252; fr_FR (nb)
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 09:06, Laszl
+1 (binding)
- .asc and sha checked.
- binary installed
- a Maven project can be opened
- code completion works
> Dear community,
>
> I want to start voting on Apache NetBeans Language Server VSCode
> extension convenience binary for 12.2 release of Apache NetBeans. It is
> built off the main Ap
Dear community,
I want to start voting on Apache NetBeans Language Server VSCode
extension convenience binary for 12.2 release of Apache NetBeans. It is
built off the main Apache NetBeans 12.2 voting candidate 2, sent by
Laszlo Kishalmi.
Build description is here
https://github.com/apache/ne
+1 (binding)
Checked files and sigs, built with JDK 8 on Ubuntu 20.04, tested with
Adopt JDK 14.
Product Version: Apache NetBeans IDE 12.2
Java: 14.0.2; OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 14.0.2+12
Runtime: OpenJDK Runtime Environment 14.0.2+12
System: Linux version 5.4.0-54-generic running on amd64; UTF-8
+1 (binding)
- Checked jar files
- Verified the cryptographic signatures, the NOTICE and LICENSE file
- BUILD SUCCESSFUL (openjdk version "1.8.0_275")
- Tried creating a PHP project and running CC. Works fine.
Thanks,
Junichi
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 5:06 PM Laszlo Kishalmi
wrote:
>
> Dear commu
+1 (binding)
- Verified signature, NOTICE and LICENSE file
- Built and ran without issues using Zulu-11 JDK on OS X 10.14.6:
Product Version: Apache NetBeans IDE 12.2
Java: 11.0.5; OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.5+10-LTS
Runtime: OpenJDK Runtime Environment 11.0.5+10-LTS
System: Mac OS X version 1
Hey Alan,
I just can answer the opened files. The opened files are handled from the
projects. So it is Independent from the Import. If you Import Settings with all
your opened projects, the assumption is that the files that were opened before,
also opened. But this is not working. I think this
+1 (binding)
* SHA512 of source zip checked
* verified netbeans-12.2-source.zip.asc signature
* LICENSE, NOTICE files present and contains expected content
* built from the sources
* the product contains LICENSE, NOTICE
* opened [java] project, built run, edited source
* verified netbeans-12.2-bi
+1
tested the binaries on Ubuntu 20.04.
Martin
On 21. 11. 20 9:06, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
Dear community,
This is our second voting candidate for the 12.2 release of Apache
NetBeans. It is built off the same commit as 12.2-rc3. Please note
all requirements below for validating sources and conve
+1 (binding)
- sha512 is OK
- `.asc` file is OK
- NOTICE and LICENSE seem OK
- builds and runs on BigSur
- `find . -not -type dir | grep jar$` seems to be fine
- convenience binary downloads and runs on Linux
In addition to the above I've successfully built
```
$ ant -f java/java.lsp.server buil
I vote Yes.
This version again brings some welcome feature, in particular the improved in
line hints, which
are great for teaching.
On 2020/11/16 07:57:59, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> This is our first voting candidate for the 12.2 release of Apache
> NetBeans. It is built
24 matches
Mail list logo
