Some minimum JDK level needs to be specified. While this is basically
arbitrary based on the needs of the platform and work required to support
it, I think it makes sense that the minimum should be some LTS version. To
get the widest audience would suggest that version should be the oldest LTS
Hi Neil,
Am Donnerstag, dem 16.03.2023 um 11:23 + schrieb Neil C Smith:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 at 22:22, Neil C Smith wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Feb 2023, 19:11 Matthias Bläsing,
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Am Freitag, dem 10.02.2023 um 10:12 + schrieb Neil C
Hi Eric,
Am Mittwoch, dem 15.03.2023 um 18:58 +0100 schrieb Eric Barboni:
>
> [Temporary use non maven dependencies for external dependencies]
>
> Or maybe we already have this.
>
Actually we have a partial solution. Have a look here:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 11:46, Svata Dedic wrote:
> I see the rapid movement between
> JDK versions that is even increasing with increased frequency of JDK
> releases (with only limited features that make a real difference for NB
> development) as dangerous
But also a reality we don't control,
Speaking for myself personally:
I'd like to step in the discussion, as I see the rapid movement between
JDK versions that is even increasing with increased frequency of JDK
releases (with only limited features that make a real difference for NB
development) as dangerous - but I still lag
Hi Matthias,
On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 at 22:22, Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2023, 19:11 Matthias Bläsing,
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am Freitag, dem 10.02.2023 um 10:12 + schrieb Neil C Smith:
>> > On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 at 19:02, Matthias Bläsing
>> > wrote:
>> > > - commit to make
