Hi Matthias, On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 at 22:22, Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sun, 12 Feb 2023, 19:11 Matthias Bläsing, > <mblaes...@doppel-helix.eu.invalid> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Am Freitag, dem 10.02.2023 um 10:12 +0000 schrieb Neil C Smith: >> > On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 at 19:02, Matthias Bläsing >> > <mblaes...@doppel-helix.eu.invalid> wrote: >> > > - commit to make NetBeans runnable on JDK LTS -1 >> > > - build with JDK LTS -1 >> > > - be able to be build with the current JDK >> > >> > +1 as long as that includes the platform. >> > >> > That is what I suggested in the other thread (I don't see why we need >> > multiple threads incidentally!) >> > >> > An LTS-1 strategy seems closest to how NetBeans used to function - >> > major-1, in a time when it also had more development resources? >> > >> > Let's also be clear, though, that adopting an LTS-1 strategy means >> > dropping JDK 11 support either in our first release after JDK 21, or >> > the first after JDK 22 - so latest May 2024. >> >> why would we do that? I said _runnable_ and _buildable_. As long as the >> current JDK support the target release I did not exclude that. > > > In which case I don't understand what you mean by committing to make NetBeans > buildable and runnable on LTS-1? That to me means dropping the commitment to > JDK 11 when it becomes LTS-2.
I'd still really like to see us make some movement here before the next release freeze in a month. I'd still like to understand whether we're saying the same or different things about adopting an LTS-1 strategy here? Thanks, Neil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
