Re: Log4J and its consequences for NetBeans and open source in general

2022-01-16 Thread Eric Bresie
Eric Bresie ebre...@gmail.com On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 5:59 AM antonio wrote: > Hi, > > For me open source is a way to learn something, do some hacking and have > some fun, so I'm not specially worried about other people's > requirements, complaints or demands (*). > > Whoever is unsatisfied wit

RE: Log4J and its consequences for NetBeans and open source in general

2022-01-15 Thread Eirik Bakke
n be completed by Tuesday." There are some companies that will actually pay for these things. (See e.g. https://www.sqlite.org/purchase/license ) -- Eirik -Original Message- From: Geertjan Wielenga Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 6:07 AM To: dev Subject: Log4J and its consequences

Re: Log4J and its consequences for NetBeans and open source in general

2022-01-15 Thread antonio
Hi, For me open source is a way to learn something, do some hacking and have some fun, so I'm not specially worried about other people's requirements, complaints or demands (*). Whoever is unsatisfied with this approach may either start giving a hand or seek for commercial support elsewhere

Re: Log4J and its consequences for NetBeans and open source in general

2022-01-15 Thread Neil C Smith
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 15:56, antonio wrote: > > Related (Apache PLC4x) > > "Your free trial version of “open-source” has expired, please update to > a commercial plan" > > https://github.com/chrisdutz/blog/blob/main/plc4x/free-trial-expired.adoc Thanks for that link. A good read, if depressingl

Re: Log4J and its consequences for NetBeans and open source in general

2022-01-14 Thread Jaroslav Tulach
pá 14. 1. 2022 v 12:08 odesílatel Geertjan Wielenga napsal: > Hi all, > > Some interesting reading: > > https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/13/opensource_apacheplc4x_payment/ > > > https://www.theregister.com/2021/12/14/log4j_vulnerability_open_source_funding/ > > As established thus far, there i

Re: Log4J and its consequences for NetBeans and open source in general

2022-01-14 Thread Eric Bresie
Would it be worth putting a link / page maybe from the contribute" to provide a way of donations and/or links to "service providers for hire for Netbeans and/or Apache"? Eric Bresie ebre...@gmail.com On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 9:56 AM antonio wrote: > Related (Apache PLC4x) > > "Your free trial v

Re: Log4J and its consequences for NetBeans and open source in general

2022-01-14 Thread antonio
Related (Apache PLC4x) "Your free trial version of “open-source” has expired, please update to a commercial plan" https://github.com/chrisdutz/blog/blob/main/plc4x/free-trial-expired.adoc Have fun, Antonio El 14/1/22 a las 14:06, antonio escribió: Agreed! Now onto the task: let's kick butt

Re: Log4J and its consequences for NetBeans and open source in general

2022-01-14 Thread antonio
Agreed! Now onto the task: let's kick butt and have fun! Cheers, Antonio On 14/01/2022 12:07, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: For me personally, I may be arriving at a situation where I'm going to be ignoring e-mails clearly coming from corporations and (to avoid those people switching to gmail accou

Re: Log4J and its consequences for NetBeans and open source in general

2022-01-14 Thread Brett Ryan
You just shook my tree to start contributing again, I have been a bit quiet lately due to time constraints, but I do mean to get back on the horse. On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 22:08, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Hi all, > > Some interesting reading: > > https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/13/opensource

Log4J and its consequences for NetBeans and open source in general

2022-01-14 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Hi all, Some interesting reading: https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/13/opensource_apacheplc4x_payment/ https://www.theregister.com/2021/12/14/log4j_vulnerability_open_source_funding/ As established thus far, there is no impact on NetBeans for the log4j situation in terms of attack vectors, si