On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 12:58, Eric Barboni wrote:
> What if,
> In Release 11.2, Linux Installer is not ok. And fix implies NetBeans
> sources changes.
>
> We would vote again on source to make release 11.2fix1 with installer and
> still have a 11.2 with missing one missing convenience?
Not a
lenga
Envoyé : mercredi 16 octobre 2019 13:29
À : dev@netbeans.apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Handling convenience binary vote(?) for 11.2
Makes sense, thanks.
Gj
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 13:26, Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 12:13, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> >
&
Makes sense, thanks.
Gj
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 13:26, Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 12:13, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> >
> > But can’t they all be handled in the same vote thread? (Sorry this has
> > probably been explained multiple times, but maybe just in this part of
> the
>
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 12:13, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>
> But can’t they all be handled in the same vote thread? (Sorry this has
> probably been explained multiple times, but maybe just in this part of the
> thread too it would help.)
Ideally, no. I think we need to require that people who are
But can’t they all be handled in the same vote thread? (Sorry this has
probably been explained multiple times, but maybe just in this part of the
thread too it would help.)
Gj
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 13:09, Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 16:49, Neil C Smith wrote:
> > I'm still not
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 16:49, Neil C Smith wrote:
> I'm still not totally sold on doing that instead of multiple vote
> threads, but we do need to be clearer on all the stuff we release, and
> what we expect everyone to actually check before voting. With more
> thought, I'm veering towards Laszlo'
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 14:16, Eric Barboni wrote:
> I like the template, I would prefer a complicated vote that make people aware
> of all the stuff we release as PMC.
I'm still not totally sold on doing that instead of multiple vote
threads, but we do need to be clearer on all the stuff we relea
h
Envoyé : jeudi 3 octobre 2019 19:08
À : dev
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Handling convenience binary vote(?) for 11.2
On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 17:00, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
> In case if we would like to vote on binaries, IMHO, I'd go with a
> mixed option. We could keep the source and the bi
On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 17:00, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
> In case if we would like to vote on binaries, IMHO, I'd go with a mixed
> option. We could keep the source and the binary zip distribution on a
> single thread as they have "instant visibility". Then vote on the
> installers (probably by platfo
Dear all,
In case if we would like to vote on binaries, IMHO, I'd go with a mixed
option. We could keep the source and the binary zip distribution on a
single thread as they have "instant visibility". Then vote on the
installers (probably by platform) and other binaries on separate threads.
All I know from this voting aspect is by following other project.
On Apache Maven vote call contains,
dist is only containing sources , binaries conveniences are on repository.
Vote is handled on one thread.
On Apache Ant vote call contains,
Dist tarball contains sources and binaries ,
Maven re
11 matches
Mail list logo
