Re: Python Donation Status

2021-08-28 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
It’s the last piece of the donation process and is pretty much stuck. You can ask and keep asking about this, the answer will be the same. I propse that we should simply be happy with what we have and move on. Python support, I suggest, should be lightweight and done via LSP rather than the old

Re: Python donation status

2020-10-06 Thread Ernie Rael
I'd like to see a non apache.netbeans branch if it would result in some modules that could be installed into regular NB. I'd contribute PRs once and a while for bugfixes, maybe more as time permits. If netbeans is ever interested in it, it could be merged. -ernie On 10/3/2020 7:37 AM, Eric

Re: Re: Re: Python donation status

2020-10-03 Thread Eric Bresie
Okay so digging through other emails on the subject I find a lot of the old code including python code in the Mercurial / hg repository as mentioned previously here [1] as well as Tim's Maven-ized version here [2] So the question is, to get "python" brought in is this as simple as (1) make a

Re: Re: Re: Python donation status

2020-10-02 Thread Eric Bresie
Is anyone working on python? If not, what needs to be done to start the ball rolling? Is it still pending Oracle vetting for the donation? Eric Bresie ebre...@gmail.com On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:00 AM Eric Bresie wrote: > >Hopefully there isn’t a newer thread on this but was looking

Re: Re: Re: Python donation status

2020-09-17 Thread Eric Bresie
Hopefully there isn’t a newer thread on this but was looking through old emails. Assume this is related to NETBEANS-4538 Please support Python. Is the contribution in question the same as associated with the nbpython.org project? On that site it seems to indicate it’s dual

Re: Re: Re: Python donation status

2020-04-19 Thread Julio César Rocha
What needs to be done by us individually? I contributed a bit of build logic about 6 years ago. Whichever commits are attributed to me, I'd obviously donate. I had also signed the OCA before. On 2020/04/13 05:13:17 Lou Dasaro wrote: > Everyone on my team was required to sign the OCA before

Re: Re: Python donation status

2020-04-12 Thread Lou Dasaro
Everyone on my team was required to sign the OCA before committing code was allowed. I'm sure we could sign something else if need be. Most of the code was written by Sun employees who are long gone. I am not able to work on the project, except for consults like this. Regards, On 2020/04/10

Re: Python donation status

2020-04-10 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
OK, thanks a lot, passed all this on, let's see. Gj On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 3:31 PM Matthias Bläsing wrote: > Hi, > > Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2020, 11:39 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > > The argument could be made that since the code was part of contrib under > > the OCA (Oracle

Re: Python donation status

2020-04-10 Thread Matthias Bläsing
Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2020, 11:39 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > The argument could be made that since the code was part of contrib under > the OCA (Oracle Contributor Agreement), it belongs to Oracle and Oracle can > simply donate it. yes - and assuming, that correct procedure was

Re: Python donation status

2020-04-09 Thread Lou Dasaro
Hello All, I can vouch that nearly all of the code in the Python modules was written by Sun or Oracle engineers. Bug fixes were subsequently written by three or four volunteers, all of whom signed the OCA. A couple of Oracle engineers helped out in their spare time with some (bug fixes) code.