Re: How to edit the NetBeans Project Incubation Status Page?

Hi, On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Wade Chandler wrote: > This is what I’m referring to: > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/netbeans.html ... I think only Incubator PMC members can edit those pages. I would recommend making that page minimal so it doesn't need to be changed often, and link

How to edit the NetBeans Project Incubation Status Page?

This is what I’m referring to: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/netbeans.html The Wiki and Incubator Web Site are available for links. Are we to request access to the SVN repo or should we submit patches? http://incubator.apache.org/incub

Re: Slack vs dev list (was: Code contribution process.)

All this is a good discussion and let's continue it. >From my point of view, I have so many channels to follow -- Twitter, Facebook, mailing lists, and more. I very rarely, although I intended to do so when the NetBeans Slach channel was set up, use Slack. A concern I have with NetBeans on Slack

Re: Slack vs dev list (was: Code contribution process.)

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Wade Chandler wrote: > ...I also hope it is a good component of a dev tools track at next years > Apache Confs :-)... At this point my dream tool is a bridge that allows people to use either a slack-like interface or an email client to talk on a single channel whi

Re: Slack vs dev list (was: Code contribution process.)

> On Mar 1, 2017, at 23:50, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > > And I wouldn't use such channels for feature discussion or even announcing > what I will work on next. I.e. "Can it be forgotten tomorrow, and we are > just as wise?” > Sure, my point on working on a feature from the perspective of Slack

Re: Two-phased code donation proposal

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > So it is acceptable if the podling release has no new features and no bugs > fixed, i.e., no new code at all?... >From the Incubator's point of view, it's absolutely fine. In the extreme (but don't tell anybody I said this ;-) a podling

Re: Two-phased code donation proposal

On 2 March 2017 at 11:10, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > So it is acceptable if the podling release has no new features and no bugs > fixed, i.e., no new code at all? Right now, we have NetBeans IDE 8.2. I > guess that means we would make that podling release NetBeans IDE 8.2.1 to > indicate that it i

Aw: Re: Two-phased code donation proposal

Of course, some bug fixes, some minor enhancements etc. > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. März 2017 um 12:10 Uhr > Von: "Geertjan Wielenga" > An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Two-phased code donation proposal > > So it is acceptable if the podling release has no new features and no

Re: Two-phased code donation proposal

So it is acceptable if the podling release has no new features and no bugs fixed, i.e., no new code at all? Right now, we have NetBeans IDE 8.2. I guess that means we would make that podling release NetBeans IDE 8.2.1 to indicate that it is really a minor release? But still the expectation would be

Re: Two-phased code donation proposal

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > ...The > release will not have any new features and will not have any bugs fixed, > instead it will purely and only have gone through all the licensing checks > and requirements from the Apache side... Agreed, that's a good thing to do fo

Re: Slack vs dev list (was: Code contribution process.)

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > ..."Can it be forgotten tomorrow, and we are just as wise?"... I like that, "we" being the whole group, i.e. dev@ subscribers. -Bertrand