Re: [Degrees of freedom under ASF ]

2019-12-20 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 3:44 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > On 12/19/2019 2:35 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > > >> Do I understand you correctly? We can use the original google group and > add a user there with the dev@nuttx.apache.org? > > Mailing list are archived / mirrored in serval places, h

RE: [Degrees of freedom under ASF ]

2019-12-19 Thread David Sidrane
First I would say: It is really good as an It is an archive, leave at that google, Done! -Original Message- From: Nathan Hartman [mailto:hartman.nat...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 7:16 AM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: [Degrees of freedom under ASF ] On Thu, Dec

Re: [Degrees of freedom under ASF ]

2019-12-19 Thread Gregory Nutt
On 12/19/2019 2:35 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, Do I understand you correctly? We can use the original google group and add a user there with the dev@nuttx.apache.org? Mailing list are archived / mirrored in serval places, here’s a couple: https://lists.apache.org https://markmail.org/search/

Re: [Degrees of freedom under ASF ]

2019-12-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Do I understand you correctly? We can use the original google group and add a > user there with the dev@nuttx.apache.org? Mailing list are archived / mirrored in serval places, here’s a couple: https://lists.apache.org https://markmail.org/search/ https://nabble.com (for some lists and it’

Re: [Degrees of freedom under ASF ]

2019-12-19 Thread Gregory Nutt
It’s preferable yes. But if they can be archived and searchable that’s fine. Often a solution is automatically sending that conversion to a mailing list or bringing back a summary to the list. Do I understand you correctly? We can use the original google group and add a user there with the

Re: [Degrees of freedom under ASF ]

2019-12-19 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:11 AM David Sidrane wrote: > On 2019/12/19 14:00:36, Justin Mclean wrote: > > > Does this need to be on only these mailing lists we have been provided by > > > ASF? > > > > It’s preferable yes. But if they can be archived and searchable that’s > > fine. Often a solutio

Re: [Degrees of freedom under ASF ]

2019-12-19 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:11 AM David Sidrane wrote: > On 2019/12/19 14:00:36, Justin Mclean wrote: > > It’s preferable yes. But if they can be archived and searchable that’s > > fine. Often a solution is automatically sending that conversion to a > > mailing list or bringing back a summary to

Re: [Degrees of freedom under ASF ]

2019-12-19 Thread David Sidrane
Thank you Justin for the quick answers! 1 more below On 2019/12/19 14:00:36, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I would like to get some clarification on the projects degrees of freedom > > under ASF from our mentors. > > As long as you follow the Apache Way you are free to do what you want. W

Re: [Degrees of freedom under ASF ]

2019-12-19 Thread Duo Zhang
In general, all discussion should happen on the infrastruct hosted by ASF, like mailing-list, JIRA, etc. This is what I have learned in the past. And when GitHub becomes popular, the solution is to send the comments on GitHub to a special mailing list of the project to record them on the infrastruc

Re: [Degrees of freedom under ASF ]

2019-12-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I would like to get some clarification on the projects degrees of freedom > under ASF from our mentors. As long as you follow the Apache Way you are free to do what you want. We have a lot of history and over time have built up guidelines which describe what has worked well. Sometimes it'