Thanks for cleaning it out
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021, 20:17 Gregory Nutt wrote:
> All of the junk repositories are gone (that is a good thing to do
> regardless of what we decide to do with the directory). The
> github.com/nuttx directory still exists. The following people have write
> access:
>
TANK U SIR! =)
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 8:17 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> All of the junk repositories are gone (that is a good thing to do
> regardless of what we decide to do with the directory). The
> github.com/nuttx directory still exists. The following people have write
> access:
>
>-
All of the junk repositories are gone (that is a good thing to do
regardless of what we decide to do with the directory). The
github.com/nuttx directory still exists. The following people have write
access:
- Alan Carvalho de Assis, acassis
- Anthony Merlino,antmerlino
- David Sidrane,
I will go ahead and remove github.com/nuttx content. There is nother there
of value now and everything is available elsewhere. So that is safe to do
in any case.
The nxflat stuff in that repository is broken for modern gcc. I fixed it
and have hosted it standalone here as well as added some basic CI.
https://github.com/btashton/nxflat
--Brennan
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021, 7:38 AM Nathan Hartman
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 9:10 AM Abdelatif Guettouche
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 9:10 AM Abdelatif Guettouche
wrote:
>
> We've been told before that we can host well known projects even if
> they are in an incompatible license. We discussed moving them to
> Apache.
> I'm not sure if we want to revive that discussion as it always went
> unnoticed, but
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:27 AM Tomasz CEDRO wrote:
> Regarding kconfig-frontends I am in touch with Espressif and Debian
> maintainers, also contacted initial author Yann MORIN. Maybe putting
> this package into the Apache organization would be a good idea if
> possible..?
It occurred to me
> I would be happy to delete the whole thing. Adbelatif has offered to
> delete the contents as well. But we would need consensus. A few people
> writing emails doesn't constitute consensus. That is why we have formal
> votes so that everyone's voice is heard and the direction is clear.
We
> Either way is fine, but we need action now. I have seen the same topic
> happen on the email list many times, but nothing happens after that
>discussion.
I would be happy to delete the whole thing. Adbelatif has offered to
delete the contents as well. But we would need consensus. A few
It's going to be a clear trademark problem and the GitHub organization is
controlled by random people. Most PPMC members have no control over it.
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021, 11:51 PM Alin Jerpelea wrote:
> I propose that we delete the contents of https://github.com/NuttX/ and we
> host there only
I propose that we delete the contents of https://github.com/NuttX/ and we
host there only the components that have conflicting licenses under
https://github.com/NuttX/nuttx-extras
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021, 06:45 Xiang Xiao wrote:
> Some tools(e.g. kconfig-frontend) are critical for NuttX, but in
Some tools(e.g. kconfig-frontend) are critical for NuttX, but in an
unmaintained state, so we have to maintain our own version.
Two options here:
1. Host on https://bitbucket.org/nuttx/, Greg needs to share the admin
right to all PPMC/Commmiter member.
2. Host on
Agreed it will just complicate things moving towards graduation. I had
asked for it to be taken down a long time ago.
--Brennan
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021, 7:10 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> No, https://github.com/NuttX/nuttx is just garbage and should be deleted.
> It has nothing to do with Apache NuttX
Removing is one time destructive operation. Something may be still
necessary from there.
Archiving with a redirect message seems safer solution, it will be
still available to read/download but no updates, then things could be
removed after careful examination if/when necessary :-)
Tomek
On Sat,
I don't know what to do with the submodule repositories: Documentation,
configs, and arch. Should these be retained online somewhere so that those
very old releases could be built?
Those directories were originally part of nuttx/, then moved to submodules,
then later merged back under nuttx/.
BTW the version of the OS we have there, is _very_ old. The description says:
> This is an old snapshot of NuttX from when arch/, configs/, and
> Documentation/ were submodules
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 5:43 PM Abdelatif Guettouche
wrote:
>
> I can access it and deleting it is a click away
I can access it and deleting it is a click away (provided that Github
doesn't ask for every members approval)
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 5:17 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> I just tried accessing github.com/nuttx and it appears that I can no longer
> see project information. I don't know what is going
I just tried accessing github.com/nuttx and it appears that I can no longer
see project information. I don't know what is going on with those
repositories.
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 9:09 AM Abdelatif Guettouche <
abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> People who have admin access to that org
People who have admin access to that org are all committers/PPMC members.
If we want to take it down we can do that.
As Greg mentioned earlier, that was supposed to host GPL repos and the os
and apps version there are outdated.
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021, 16:53 Tomasz CEDRO wrote:
> I have contacted
I have contacted GitHub support in that matter. Maybe taking ownership
of that org / repo will be possible.
Tomek
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 4:39 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> The project never was at that location, https://github.com/NuttX.
> Everything there is of uncertain lineage and uncertain and
The project never was at that location, https://github.com/NuttX.
Everything there is of uncertain lineage and uncertain and should just be
removed or converted to mirrors.
Prior to moving to https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx*, the project
was on bitbucket at https://bitbucket.org/nuttx/.
Maybe you could re-gain access Gregory manage users and put it in an
"archived state" with a note that the project moved to Apache
organization? :-)
That way nothing will be deleted, while note on new upstream will
redirect users to a new place decreasing confusion.
There is a chance that
No, https://github.com/NuttX/nuttx is just garbage and should be deleted.
It has nothing to do with Apache NuttX and I don't think anything has been
touched there in months.
A thought was that this could be a place to keep GPL tools and applications
that are needed with NuttX but that are
Hello world :-)
Another thing I found confusing a bit for a newcomer is the dual
repository model:
1. https://github.com/NuttX/nuttx
2. https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx
There is not information or redirect on 1 that development takes place on 2.
Is 2 going to become 1 back again when
24 matches
Mail list logo
