Cool. Is there a possibility to share your work via PM? This way I can test
the solution on my side also.
Jernej
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 8:23 AM Xiang Xiao
wrote:
> We have implemented file lock to support the database engine like sqlite
> and unqlite. The implementation will go upstream soon.
We have implemented file lock to support the database engine like sqlite
and unqlite. The implementation will go upstream soon.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 3:04 PM Jernej Turnsek
wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to use Sqlite on NuttX and I have managed to successfully
> build the Sqlite3 library. When
Hi,
the same problem as new UNUSED macro was causing me problems when building
external libraries, like LuaJIT, an assert macro is also causing problems
when building Sqlite3 library. Sqlite code has a lot of assert statements
which are usually excluded when NDEBUG is set. But when assert is
Hi,
I would like to use Sqlite on NuttX and I have managed to successfully
build the Sqlite3 library. When running the library, I have noticed that
Sqlite is using fcntl F_SETLK and F_SETLKW for locking and those are not
implemented on NuttX. Is there a plan to implement this in the future?
Reference to cheap FPGA boards (< $20) were added to the new repo, more
docs will follow there: https://github.com/cederom/nuttx-fpga
So, FPGA is not strictly related to $$$
FPGA development boards are indeed not cheap, as the chips themselves are
expensive. But those of us who are in the field know some solutions. Indeed
I'm working on designing a low cost FPGA board right now.
Until mine is ready, a useful alternative is to reuse some mass marketed
products that are
Okay, this may be too complex and too early, true I also had lots of
issues and was not able to work on my FreeBSD with Open-Source only
tools, lets start step by step from simple things first then more
complex ones, will try again with NuttX+FPGA funding next round, thank
you guys, I will be in
Let's follow the discussion here to avoid polluting the previous thread.
On 2/18/24, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> Closed, okay, and the FPGA part did not get in?
>
> --
> CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
>
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 10:17 PM Alan C. Assis wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tomek,
>> Thank you
Hi Victor,
Yes, as I said before I also think this is a very important field, but at
least for this chinese board I realized that things are not there yet.
Maybe using a Lattice FPGA could work better, but anyway, a good FPGA board
to run a RISC-V is not too low cost.
Tang Primer 20K is lower
Hi
I have experience doing FPGA development including graphics (micropython
port, ImGUI port, USB mouse/keyboard etc.)
I think the open-source tool ecosystem for FPGA development is mature
enough not to depend on proprietary tools and IP, mainly related to Lattice
devices but also for most Xilinx
Tomek,
The list with all GSoC 2024 from Apache Foundation is here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/GSoC+2024+Ideas+list
Until now we have two contributors interested in participating, but we
proposed 6 projects.
Best Regards,
Alan
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 8:02 PM Tomek
No, as we pointed out, it is a long term project that needs to be well
thought out.
You listed many possibilities, we need to define a goal and focus on it.
Let me share my (bad) experience with FPGA:
Sometime ago I bought a low cost Tang Primer 20K board expecting to start
using open-source
12 matches
Mail list logo
