[jira] Resolved: (OFBIZ-857) Remove sessionid for Googlebot Co.

2007-04-04 Thread Dimitri Unruh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dimitri Unruh resolved OFBIZ-857. - Resolution: Fixed Could someone please review this patch?! Kind regards Dimitri Unruh Remove

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-857) Remove sessionid for Googlebot Co.

2007-04-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-857: -- Attachment: (was: patch.txt) Remove sessionid for Googlebot Co.

[jira] Reopened: (OFBIZ-857) Remove sessionid for Googlebot Co.

2007-04-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-857: --- This issue was closed, don't know why. Remove sessionid for Googlebot Co.

Re: release?

2007-04-04 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
I think that we have to make a plan. What I think should be done before/for the release is at least: 1) fix or resolve at least the critical bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310500priority=2resolution=-1 2) of course, prepare the distribution as

Re: Questions about error status of the jobs in JobSandbox

2007-04-04 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi Andy, what do you think? can I commit it? Jacopo David E. Jones wrote: I think it's a good idea, it is more informative and accurate than Finished. Andrew Zeneski would know better if it will have any side effects or not. -David On Mar 31, 2007, at 6:13 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

Re: Removing unnecessary jdbc jar files

2007-04-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Jacopo, We may keep hsqldb.jar. Often practical to have it on hand. Jacques - Message d'origine - De : Jacopo Cappellato [EMAIL PROTECTED] À : dev@ofbiz.apache.org Envoyé : mercredi 4 avril 2007 10:45 Objet : Re: Removing unnecessary jdbc jar files Hi all, apart from the changes

Re: release?

2007-04-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux
I think that we have to make a plan. What I think should be done before/for the release is at least: 1) fix or resolve at least the critical bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310500priority=2resolution=-1

Re: What about moving the build/* files into the new runtime folder?

2007-04-04 Thread Ashish Vijaywargiya
Jacopo, How will you manage the content of the build folder ??? Will you add the prefix or suffix for the content of each component or the component name itself ??? BTW I like the idea. I vote for it +1. On 4/4/07, Jacopo Cappellato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now that we have the new runtime

Re: What about moving the build/* files into the new runtime folder?

2007-04-04 Thread Jonathon -- Improov
+1 Jonathon Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Now that we have the new runtime folder, containing all the runtime objects, what about moving all the build/* files from each component into a new runtime/build/ folder? In this way the only folder in which there will be files written while

Re: What about moving the build/* files into the new runtime folder?

2007-04-04 Thread Gautam Deb
+1 Jonathon -- Improov wrote: +1 Jonathon Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Now that we have the new runtime folder, containing all the runtime objects, what about moving all the build/* files from each component into a new runtime/build/ folder? In this way the only folder in which there will be

Re: What about moving the build/* files into the new runtime folder?

2007-04-04 Thread David E. Jones
In a way it is nice for each component to contain and control it's own stuff, but this does bring up a good point. For a release we should probably wipe out the build classes directories and just keep the jar files. For development it's nice to have the jar files to make it possible to

Re: release?

2007-04-04 Thread David E. Jones
This is a good list, though we can probably drop off anything related to a marketing concern for now, like preparing a press release. At this point the developer/committer community in OFBiz seems to be _too_ busy, and a bunch of new user traffic coming into the project might be

Re: Refactoring the ui of the Store Shipping screens

2007-04-04 Thread David E. Jones
Either way, it's great to see this stuff getting cleaned up. It's a pretty confusing set of old stuff. -David On Apr 4, 2007, at 3:37 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: With rev. 525223 I've started the cleanup and refactoring of the Store Shipping screens. I've added a new tab where you can

Re: What about moving the build/* files into the new runtime folder?

2007-04-04 Thread David E. Jones
On Apr 4, 2007, at 8:22 AM, Jonathon -- Improov wrote: For development it's nice to have the jar files to make it possible to rebuild incrementally. I guess each build.xml file would have to know about the runtime folder and explicitly put it's stuff there, and if it doesn't and

Re: release?

2007-04-04 Thread David E. Jones
Here is that document for OFBiz: http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Release+Plan It hasn't been changed in a while, and it is clear about the preliminary nature of an initial release based on a release branch, but there is no real name for it yet. I guess my thought was really in two

Re: What about moving the build/* files into the new runtime folder?

2007-04-04 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
David, I'm sorry but I'm not sure to understand what you are suggesting to do. Are you saying that we should keep the build folders where they are now? Jacopo David E. Jones wrote: In a way it is nice for each component to contain and control it's own stuff, but this does bring up a good

Re: What about moving the build/* files into the new runtime folder?

2007-04-04 Thread David E. Jones
Whoops, you caught me. Yeah, I was being rather vague about what I think we should do... All in all, I think this approach is fine and will improve certain things, especially keeping our directory structure clean. The only downside I can think of is that right now you can pretty much

Re: What about moving the build/* files into the new runtime folder?

2007-04-04 Thread Jonathon -- Improov
David, Actually, OFBiz doesn't do any searching around, everything on the classpath is configured very explicitly, mostly through the ofbiz-component.xml files for runtime, and through build.xml file for the build. All the more why it's a good idea to get every module's ofbiz-component.xml

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-588) Replace all div class=tabletext wrappers with p or just remove them and set the style info in the BODY element in the css file

2007-04-04 Thread Adrian Crum (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12486696 ] Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-588: --- Anil, This work still needs to be reviewed and committed. The only

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-869) French translation for Accounting module

2007-04-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12486700 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-869: --- Eric, Great news, all good wills are welcome ! French translation

Re: What about moving the build/* files into the new runtime folder?

2007-04-04 Thread Shi Yusen
-1 This improvement will introduce a further proposal: should the src be moved out? I think if compared with version release, this priority is quite low. Shi Yusen/Beijing Langhua Ltd. 在 2007-04-04三的 10:52 +0200,Jacopo Cappellato写道: Now that we have the new runtime folder, containing all the

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-871) Epson POS printers do not work with jdk 1.5

2007-04-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
Epson POS printers do not work with jdk 1.5 --- Key: OFBIZ-871 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-871 Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) Issue Type: Test

[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-872) console.log not pointed to runtime directory

2007-04-04 Thread Jacopo Cappellato (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-872: --- Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato console.log not pointed to runtime directory

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-872) console.log not pointed to runtime directory

2007-04-04 Thread Jacopo Cappellato (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-872. --- Resolution: Fixed Thanks David, your patch is in rev. 525699 console.log not pointed to