The Buildbot has finished a build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2218
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 894563
I was for the tests-*.xml type of file because it was consistent with services defintions files names. But I should say that I
don't like to have dashes and underscores in names at large (should I say that it remains me my 1st and only short experience with
Cobol 25 years ago ). It would be
Yes but the definition and implementation of a test need two separate
files. Same is true for a service except the entity-auto feature.
There is an example btw.
party/script/org/ofbiz/party/test/PartyTests.xml
party/testdef/PartyTests.xml
Both of files above reside in different folders in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3386.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Thanks
If a test is written as a simple-method it should be names like other files, ie
as *Services.xml or *SimpleMethods.xml (an older form, not used much).
-David
On Dec 30, 2009, at 2:39 AM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Yes but the definition and implementation of a test need two separate files.
Same
Bruno Busco wrote:
One thing we need in the framework is the possibility to create a
userLogin with an associated email address and have the possibility to
have the password emailed if forgotten.
This is actually done in
public static String emailPassword(HttpServletRequest request,
The Buildbot has finished a build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2219
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 894570
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES reassigned OFBIZ-3381:
-
Assignee: Erwan de FERRIERES
Update of the geolocation screen in party
Hi all,
While looking at the uiLabels, I was wondering if there is an existing
tool which can quickly find all the unused ones in OFBiz.
I don't know if there are some of them, but if some are present, it
would be nice to remove them.
Cheers,
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
chris snow updated OFBIZ-3385:
--
Attachment: patch.txt
Axis2 integration returns Unsupported Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8
Please devs, don't forget to add your changes in Main New features with short
explanations
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+features
Thanks
Jacques
Forget it, there is already Only Not Used Labels ;o)
Jacques
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
Hi Erwan,
I don't think so. But may be derived from the Only Missing Translations
feature in Webtools Label Manager?
Jacques
From: Erwan de FERRIERES
Maybe Jira can help in populating this page:
New Features resolved from 2009-12-01 to 2009-12-31:
The Buildbot has finished a build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2220
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 894576
hi all,
I am trying to implement an ajax tooltip feature in ofbiz, what i am doing are:
1, define a request map in controller.xml to handle request for
tooltip resource from client. the client requested uri looks like:
http://localhost:8080/tooltip?res=${uiLabelMap.CommonUpdate}
2, write a
I put a comment to Gavin at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2353
We want to receive it only when it fails. Anyway it's better to receive in both
cases than never :)
Thanks
Jacques
From: build...@apache.org
The Buildbot has finished a build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full
As mentioned already in the jira issue what we want is notification of
when the status changes i.e. from pass to fail or from fail to pass
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 31/12/2009, at 12:39 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I put a comment to Gavin at
The Buildbot has finished a build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2221
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 894593
The Buildbot has finished a build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 894595
Hi devs,
I am trying to remove some OFBiz components but even removing few
specialpurpose components make the build or the data loading
impossible.
I think we need to gain back the components independence in a controlled way.
Even reviewing commits is not so easy to detect that a change
introduce
Nicolas,
Your proposal for a new method like, SequenceUtil.getNextSequence(String
key, long staggerMax) sounds like what I am proposing. Would the
staggerMax parameter set the next range of sequence IDs? For example:
Before calling getNextSequence method
SeqName: MySequence
SeqId: 1000
Now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3374:
---
Attachment: lookups.patch
Hey,
sorry for the late update (yersterday was birthday time, i
David E Jones wrote:
If a test is written as a simple-method it should be names like other files,
ie as *Services.xml or *SimpleMethods.xml (an older form, not used much).
Shouldn't test definitions(classes, simple methods, entity defs, etc)
only be active if tests are being run? This would
So, every success of buildbot will send a message? I would prefer
just when an error is detected, then when the build is fixed after
such an error. Seeing one for every commit seems to be worthless.
Adam Heath wrote:
So, every success of buildbot will send a message? I would prefer
just when an error is detected, then when the build is fixed after
such an error. Seeing one for every commit seems to be worthless.
Ah, I see others agree with this too.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795374#action_12795374
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3374:
Hi Sascha,
Right, I found this line
+
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795470#action_12795470
]
chris snow commented on OFBIZ-3385:
---
I'm also having problems trying to call
The security-aware artifacts implementation is nearly complete. The
branch is out of date and I can't get it synchronized with the trunk
because there are too many conflicts. I would like to create a new
branch and port the security-aware artifacts implementation over to that.
Any objections?
Not a problem from my POV.
Thanks for your continued work on this Adrian!
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
The security-aware artifacts implementation is nearly complete. The
branch is out of date and I can't get it synchronized with the trunk
because there are too many conflicts.
Hi,
the MyPortal component has many seed data that create a dependence
from many other components.
This is done because the seed data create the default MyPortal
portalPages that include several portlets from all other components.
For example:
PortalPagePortlet portalPageId=MYPORTAL_EMPLOYEE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795541#action_12795541
]
Sumit Pandit commented on OFBIZ-3366:
-
Thank you Awdesh.
Validate operations in
That still represents a dependency on the other component.
Lower level components should not even have anything that represents an
awareness of a higher level component.
The solution, and the only solution, is to move the data to the higher level
components. It's that simple.
-David
On Dec
On Dec 30, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The security-aware artifacts implementation is nearly complete. The branch is
out of date and I can't get it synchronized with the trunk because there are
too many conflicts. I would like to create a new branch and port the
security-aware
If my Ofbiz application is hosted in a intranet where proxy setting details
need to provided for internet access Where exactly i need to metion the
proxy setting details for google checkout access.??
--
View this message in context:
34 matches
Mail list logo
