[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839189#action_12839189
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-3522:
--
I am testing this now and this is an u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato resolved OFBIZ-3522.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Adam Heath (was: Jacopo Cappellato)
> webtools ViewG
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839193#action_12839193
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-3522:
--
Fixed in Release Branch 9.04 and SVN t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Busco updated OFBIZ-3505:
---
Attachment: party_to_agreement_entity_move.patch
The party_to_agreement_entity_move.patch moves all t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Busco updated OFBIZ-3505:
---
Attachment: party_to_agreement_entity_move.patch
Forgot to flag the ASF license grant
> Data model t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Busco updated OFBIZ-3505:
---
Attachment: (was: party_to_agreement_entity_move.patch)
> Data model to have Content and Party ap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839201#action_12839201
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3505:
---
It would seem that agreements are between parties
Ag
Thanks Jacopo,
I hope the person who did the wrong formatting will compate before/after to understands what s/he did wrong. Maybe Hans you can
invite him/er to do so?
Jacques
From: "Jacopo Cappellato"
Fixed it in rev. 916923
Jacopo
On Feb 26, 2010, at 4:28 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Adam,
What would be your preferred tool for managing the builds if we made
ofbiz more modular?
Many thanks,
Chris
Adam Heath wrote:
Christopher Snow wrote:
Hi Adam,
I too would like to see a more modular ofbiz (e.g. maven + osgi), but
that is a big step. For example, it would be gr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839218#action_12839218
]
Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-3505:
Thank you BJ for reviewing the patch.
I see what y
On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Christopher Snow wrote:
> Me too, however with the current dependencies ,framework effectively depends
> on applications anyway.
And in fact we have to fix this.
Jacopo
>
> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> I am against moving party in the framework; we can discuss if
On Feb 26, 2010, at 10:47 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
> This is what I am also trying to do.
> Just have the possibility to *remove* all the applications but party
> and content from an OFBiz installation and have it working.
I think this has to be done into two separate and independent steps:
1) fram
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839223#action_12839223
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-3505:
--
About agreements: I think this was alr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839225#action_12839225
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3505:
---
The data model book uses Order for agreements.
but I
thanks jacopo, will see it does not happen again.
Regards,
Hans
On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 07:55 +, jaco...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jacopoc
> Date: Sat Feb 27 07:55:32 2010
> New Revision: 916923
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916923&view=rev
> Log:
> (A bunch) of formatting fixes:
you are welcome, Hans (btw, it was not a big deal).
Jacopo
On Feb 27, 2010, at 11:57 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
> thanks jacopo, will see it does not happen again.
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>
> On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 07:55 +, jaco...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jacopoc
>> Date: Sat Feb 27 07:55:32 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839234#action_12839234
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3505:
Creating agreements in Party looks ok to m
Hi,
When we decide to create this page in the wiki it was decided that only Main New Fearture will get in. Also it was more destined to
end users than devs
When I look at recent adds, for instance
a.. Accounting
a.. Converted simple events in FixedAssetMaintEvents.xml to services.
I don't t
If we wanted to list the things like you mentioned, we could create a page like
Si Chen used to have - which was a summary of the commit log.
-Adrian
--- On Sat, 2/27/10, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> From: Jacques Le Roux
> Subject: Main New Features In The OFBiz Trunk
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Heath reopened OFBIZ-3522:
---
Not fixed, you can't edit anything either.
> webtools ViewGeneric does not work with entities that have
Christopher Snow wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> What would be your preferred tool for managing the builds if we made
> ofbiz more modular?
Must be stand-alone. Can't depend on anything from the network.
Network resources may not be available in all cases. Plus, network
resources can become stale, and g
lekt...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: lektran
> Date: Sat Feb 27 15:40:17 2010
> New Revision: 916972
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916972&view=rev
> Log:
> The following deprecated classes, constructors or methods have been removed:
> org.ofbiz.entity.transaction.TransactionUtil.rollbac
lekt...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: lektran
> Date: Sat Feb 27 15:40:21 2010
> New Revision: 916973
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916973&view=rev
> Log:
> Minor code cleanup: removed unnecessary cast and changed how a static field
> was being accessed
>
> Modified:
>
> ofbiz/tru
Based on the replies to this thread, I created a new package -
org.ofbiz.base.lang - and I moved some classes there. Revision 916987.
-Adrian
--- On Fri, 2/19/10, Adrian Crum wrote:
> From: Adrian Crum
> Subject: Discussion: New package org.ofbiz.base.types
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839268#action_12839268
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-3522:
--
It is actually. I have tested it befor
Do we really need that? I think those interested by this kind of information
can follow the commits.
I'm pretty sure a such page will not be maintained seriously in the mid term.
We have already some difficulties to maintain the Main New Fearture which, I repeat, sould be only a summarize at the
On 27/02/2010, at 9:46 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
> lekt...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: lektran
>> Date: Sat Feb 27 15:40:17 2010
>> New Revision: 916972
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916972&view=rev
>> Log:
>> The following deprecated classes, constructors or methods have been removed:
Hello Hans | Tim,
Here are major points for your ready reference that are supported/
present in the eBay component before the introduction of ebaystore
component:
* Multiple product store handling support in which you can maintain
the relevant data for your product, category OOTB.
* With respect
Hi Adam, do you know of any tools available that meet these requirements?
Adam Heath wrote:
Christopher Snow wrote:
Hi Adam,
What would be your preferred tool for managing the builds if we made
ofbiz more modular?
Must be stand-alone. Can't depend on anything from the network.
Netw
Christopher Snow wrote:
> Hi Adam, do you know of any tools available that meet these requirements?
Um, I may be going out on a limb here, but ant?
>
> Adam Heath wrote:
>> Christopher Snow wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Adam,
>>>
>>> What would be your preferred tool for managing the builds if we made
>>> o
Thanks for this Adam. These are great points maven versus ant.
-David
On Feb 27, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
> Christopher Snow wrote:
>> Hi Adam,
>>
>> What would be your preferred tool for managing the builds if we made
>> ofbiz more modular?
>
> Must be stand-alone. Can't depend
Please excuse my ignorance...
If the ofbiz src tree was split up into new svn projects (e.g. entity
engine, service engine, etc) , would ant be able to easily manage the
dependencies between each project?
If maven doesn't do the job of managing dependencies very well, what
about ivy?
Many
David E Jones wrote:
> Thanks for this Adam. These are great points maven versus ant.
It may be possible to do what I want with maven. But the fact that in
*all* cases where I have had the horror of seeing maven used by a
project, they have *all* been network based, required maven installed
in th
There are *tons* of places in base that call Debug.logError, either
with or without an exception, then immediately throw their own
exception back to their callers.
Debug.logError should *not* be called, if the error is being reported
back to the caller in some other manner. This is a cause of maj
I've almost completed adding full test coverage on simpleTypeConvert
from before it got switched over to the new conversion framework. The
parts I don't have are GenericValue(not available from the cmdline),
java.nio.Buffer and Node(these last two because I haven't done them yet).
I then switched
Send a Confirmation email content doesn't generate correct URL
---
Key: OFBIZ-3523
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3523
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya updated OFBIZ-3523:
---
Attachment: Order_Confirmation.png
> Send a Confirmation email content doesn't genera
37 matches
Mail list logo
