Looks like we have a good consensus around Jquery so far.
I must say that the main arugment for Dojo was its serious. It's a real consistent framework with embedded widgets, not only an API.
All those third parties Jquery's widgets (and Prototypes's) are a bit frightening. On the other hand
Good morning guys,
sounds good to me. I will now start implementing a example widget based
onjQuery and provide a patch asap. So erveryone can see how jQuery works.
Have a nice day.
Sascha
2010/6/9 Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
Looks like we have a good consensus around Jquery
Le 09/06/2010 10:59, Sascha Rodekamp a écrit :
Good morning guys,
sounds good to me. I will now start implementing a example widget based
onjQuery and provide a patch asap. So erveryone can see how jQuery works.
Have a nice day.
Sascha
2010/6/9 Jacques Le Rouxjacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
Hi
Le 09/06/2010 11:37, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
BTW I opened the dojo1.4 branch but I guess we will drop it and use
rather a jquery branch?
From the different inputs we had on this thread, yes, I think so.. Just
wait for the svn to be repaired !
Cheers,
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
BTW I opened the dojo1.4 branch but I guess we will drop it and use rather a
jquery branch?
Jacques
From: Erwan de FERRIERES erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr
Le 09/06/2010 10:59, Sascha Rodekamp a écrit :
Good morning guys,
sounds good to me. I will now start implementing a example widget based
jep another brunch would be great.
Our first steps should not effect the trunk i think;)
Cheers
2010/6/9 Erwan de FERRIERES erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr
Le 09/06/2010 11:37, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
BTW I opened the dojo1.4 branch but I guess we will drop it and use
rather a jquery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12877039#action_12877039
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3798:
Be careful Nicolas to not add your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12877043#action_12877043
]
Malin Nicolas commented on OFBIZ-3798:
--
Arg, so speed :/
But it's not for inclusion,
I simply renames dojo1.4 in jquery, it's available
Jacques
From: Sascha Rodekamp sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com
jep another brunch would be great.
Our first steps should not effect the trunk i think;)
Cheers
2010/6/9 Erwan de FERRIERES erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr
Le 09/06/2010
Cool thanks Jacques ... i'will have a look later and provide a first
testing patch.
Cheers
Sascha
2010/6/9 Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
I simply renames dojo1.4 in jquery, it's available
Jacques
From: Sascha Rodekamp sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com
jep another
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicolas Malin updated OFBIZ-3765:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-3765.patch
Test are now OK. When we enter in getNext fonction, I just alerte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicolas Malin updated OFBIZ-3798:
-
Summary: Add xml-rpc engine on serviceengine (was: Add generic service to
call xml-rpc request)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12877070#action_12877070
]
Nicolas Malin commented on OFBIZ-3798:
--
I rename Jira for better understanding.
To
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12877093#action_12877093
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-3798:
Nicolas,
I think it would be better if the
Thanks Erwan!
Jacques
- Original Message -
From: er...@apache.org
To: comm...@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 4:00 PM
Subject: svn commit: r953013 [1/3] - in /ofbiz/branches/jquery: LICENSE framework/images/webapp/images/jquery/
jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Wed Jun 9 13:20:21 2010
New Revision: 952997
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=952997view=rev
Log:
Implemented sql date to time converter to avoid errors with Oracle.
Modified:
On 6/9/2010 8:49 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Wed Jun 9 13:20:21 2010
New Revision: 952997
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=952997view=rev
Log:
Implemented sql date to time converter to avoid errors with Oracle.
Modified:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/9/2010 8:49 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Wed Jun 9 13:20:21 2010
New Revision: 952997
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=952997view=rev
Log:
Implemented sql date to time converter to avoid errors with Oracle.
On 6/9/2010 9:21 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/9/2010 8:49 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Wed Jun 9 13:20:21 2010
New Revision: 952997
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=952997view=rev
Log:
Implemented sql date to time converter to
jQuery Implementtion - Umbrella Main Task
-
Key: OFBIZ-3814
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3814
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: ALL COMPONENTS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3808.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Dojo Version Update to 1.4 - Umbrella Main Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3810.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Content Navigation Tree don't work with Dojo 1.4 (we use 1.4.3 in branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3812.
--
Resolution: Invalid
The ONePage Checkout don't work with the Dojo 1.4 (we use 1.4.3 in branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3811.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Move Dojo Themes into OFBiz Themes
--
Content Navigation Tree implemented with jQuery
---
Key: OFBIZ-3815
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3815
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components: content
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3815:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-3815_jqueryExample_ContentNavigation.patch
Why does EntityCondition create objects from a factory? This means
that any condition that needs to be created will end up storing the
object into the global heap, with all the requisite locks and
contention that occur from that. If a new object was just created,
however, java1.6 has the ability
Public service announcement: Object pooling is now a serious
performance loss for all but the most heavyweight of objects, and even
then it is tricky to get right without introducing concurrency bottlenecks.
Adrian Crum wrote:
Public service announcement: Object pooling is now a serious
performance loss for all but the most heavyweight of objects, and even
then it is tricky to get right without introducing concurrency
bottlenecks.
I remember when Javolution was first brought into the project. The
reason for adding it was better performance. I was new to the project at
the time, so I just assumed that was true.
Since then I have read many books and articles on Java, and now I'm not
sure that Javolution is appropriate
Adrian Crum wrote:
I remember when Javolution was first brought into the project. The
reason for adding it was better performance. I was new to the project at
the time, so I just assumed that was true.
Since then I have read many books and articles on Java, and now I'm not
sure that
On 6/9/2010 3:44 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
I remember when Javolution was first brought into the project. The
reason for adding it was better performance. I was new to the project at
the time, so I just assumed that was true.
Since then I have read many books and articles on
On Jun 9, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
Public service announcement: Object pooling is now a serious
performance loss for all but the most heavyweight of objects, and even
then it is tricky to get right without introducing concurrency
bottlenecks.
On Jun 9, 2010, at 4:56 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/9/2010 3:44 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
I remember when Javolution was first brought into the project. The
reason for adding it was better performance. I was new to the project at
the time, so I just assumed that was true.
--- On Wed, 6/9/10, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote:
On Jun 9, 2010, at 4:56 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/9/2010 3:44 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
I remember when Javolution was first brought
into the project. The
reason for adding it was better performance. I
was new to
35 matches
Mail list logo
