Ok, I will check it as soon as I could do it.
Thanks a lot Jacopo to take a look at it.
Marco
Messaggio originale
Da: jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
Data: 14/01/2011 8.18
A: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Ogg: Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk
Hi Marco,
The following change
Hi Hans,
could you please better explain what was the error and why you have decided to
modify the PerfReviewItem entity?
I am asking you this because, even if I don't know much about this area of the
data model, from what I understand:
- PerfReview is used to define an employee performance
I changed this entity according the datamodel resource boook and what
the forms and services where expecting,
please note the fields were not added or removed on the forms.
Regards,
Hans
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 09:59 +0100, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Hans,
could you please better explain
Ok i did not see the unusual index of the PerfRreview too: which
includes the employeeId and role. This is also not according the
dataresource book. I would even suggest to take the employeeparty and
role out of this key too and follow the general pattern that the
perfReview entity has a single
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-4014:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-4014_ModelFormField_DateTimeField_i18n.patch
Patch update against the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12981743#action_12981743
]
Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-4014:
Hm i think the only missing thing are date
Hans,
I think that you are not interpreting correctly this part of the data model,
please have a deeper look at it before going on with these modifications.
Also, with reference to the Data Model Resource Book (even if we do not have to
strictly follow what it is described there), I can't see
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 10.04 into an
official release. This will be the first release of the 10.04 series (that
contains the features up to 2010-04).
The files can be downloaded from here:
http://people.apache.org/~jacopoc/dist/
Vote:
[ +1] release as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12981749#action_12981749
]
Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-3843:
Hey Nicolas could you please have a look
+1
Marco
Messaggio originale
Da: jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
Data: 14/01/2011 14.04
A: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Ogg: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 10.04
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 10.04 into an
official release. This will be the first release of the
+1
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword ofbiz
On Jan 14, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 10.04 into an
official release. This will be the first release
+1
Jacques
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 10.04 into an official release. This will be the first release of the
10.04 series (that contains the features up to 2010-04).
The files can be downloaded from
Le 14/01/2011 14:04, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 10.04 into an
official release. This will be the first release of the 10.04 series (that
contains the features up to 2010-04).
The files can be downloaded from here:
+1
--
Sascha Rodekamp
Lynx-Consulting GmbH
Johanniskirchplatz 6
D-33615 Bielefeld
http://www.lynx.de
+1
--- On Fri, 1/14/11, Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote:
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 10.04
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Friday, January 14, 2011, 5:04 AM
This is the vote thread to transform
+1
2011/1/14 Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com
+1
--- On Fri, 1/14/11, Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote:
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 10.04
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Friday, January 14,
+1
Mirko Vogelsmeier
Auszubildender Fachinformatiker AEW
Lynx-Consulting GmbH
Johanniskirchplatz 6
33615 Bielefeld
Deutschland
Fon: +49 521 5247-0
Fax: +49 521 5247-250
Mobil:
Company and Management Headquarters:
Lynx-Consulting GmbH, Johanniskirchplatz 6, 33615 Bielefeld, Deutschland
Fon:
+1
Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.
Thanks Best Regards,
Young Gu | Software Engineer | www.infor.com
On 01/14/2011 09:04 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 10.04 into an
official release. This will be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12981788#action_12981788
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-4092:
Ryan,
Is there any chance you could upload what
hi BJ,
I think you don't understand what I mean. Maybe you can take a look at JIRA
plugin framework.
--
Regards,
Michael Xu (xudong)
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:34 PM, BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net wrote:
sounds like you extending the entity engine so the data can be on the
Cloud.
Though I
we have two focuses on the Docbook usages
1)whole document for user and technical
2)help screens for individual screens.
our current structure is each component has a documents folder then
data/datahelp folder.
suggest that the documents folder file be a book, one for user and one
for
+ 1
Bilgin
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 10.04 into an
official release. This will be the first release of the 10.04 series (that
contains the features up to 2010-04).
from the commits there are still bugs being updated.
I would say once the level of bug updated drops to zero would be a time
to release.
-1
=
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52
+1
-David
On Jan 14, 2011, at 5:04 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 10.04 into an
official release. This will be the first release of the 10.04 series (that
contains the features up to 2010-04).
The files can be downloaded from
BJ,
That's not how the release plan works. Bug fixes can be applied to the
release, and then a new (minor) version can be released.
-Adrian
On 1/14/2011 9:54 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
from the commits there are still bugs being updated.
I would say once the level of bug updated drops to zero
I agree with your perspective, however note that there is not a 9.04.1
=
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52
Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/
Systems Integrator--
The policy has changed since
Jacques
From: BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net
I agree with your perspective, however note that there is not a 9.04.1
=
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
I was going on
https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/release-plan.html
# Once a release branch stabilizes an initial stable release tag and
pre-built package will be issued
to me stable means no bugs being found.
=
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
Please change subject in order to keep the voting thread clean.
In my opinion we should also release a new version of the 09.04 branch, i.e.
Apache OFBiz 09.04.01: it will be a big fix release. In fact I was going to
propose a vote for it after the release process for 10.04 will be complete.
Hi Scott,
I see now that you introduced the fullPath=true stuff at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=935146view=rev. Is it really needed
there?
Thanks
Jacques
From: jler...@apache.org
Author: jleroux
Date: Fri Jan 14 21:47:23 2011
New Revision: 1059180
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3075.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Release Branch 10.04
I mixed 2 commit comments.
In this should read
Note also that we had not to remove fullPath=true in @ofbizUrlcancelOrderItem/@ofbizUrl (orderitems.ftl), to avoid
InsecureFormPostToSecureRequest error. It was not there in R9.04 (has been introduced by Scott at
the reason for my -1 to me is not off topic.
however nice to hear we will have .01 on 9.04.
=
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52
Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan Foster updated OFBIZ-4092:
---
Attachment: rf_flatgrey.patch
Incorporated Adrian's styling and bug fixes from latest patch, dialed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan Foster updated OFBIZ-4092:
---
Attachment: rf_flatgrey_images.zip
Update The Flat Grey Visual Theme
To reject a new created order, the order status does not change
---
Key: OFBIZ-4117
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4117
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Hi Jacopo,
I do not have the book here, but just checked the system and there the
perfReviewId is already a unique value, why have employeePartyId and
roleId also in he primary key?
I suggest to change the PerfReviw entity also and take the
employeePartyId and roleId also out of the primary key.
+1
On 14 Jan 2011, at 21:04, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 10.04 into an
official release. This will be the first release of the 10.04 series (that
contains the features up to 2010-04).
The files can be downloaded from here:
+1
Thanks Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 10.04 into an
official release. This will be the first release of the 10.04 series (that
contains the features up to 2010-04).
The files can be downloaded from here:
+1.
Thanks Regards
Arun Patidar
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 10.04 into an
official release. This will be the first release of the 10.04 series (that
contains the features up to 2010-04).
The files can be downloaded from here:
+1
--
Thanks and Regards
Brajesh Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Anil Patel wrote:
+1
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword ofbiz
On Jan 14, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to transform our
+1
--
Regards
Ankit Jain
On Friday 14 January 2011 06:34 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 10.04 into an
official release. This will be the first release of the 10.04 series (that
contains the features up to 2010-04).
The files can be
+1.
Recently use the 10.04 for development now issues are minimal.
Rishi Solanki
Manager, Enterprise Software Development
HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.
Direct: +91-9893287847
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Ankit Jain ankit.j...@hotwaxmedia.comwrote:
+1
--
Regards
+1
Regards,
Jyotsna Rathore
HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On Jan 14, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 10.04 into an
official release. This will be the first release of the 10.04 series (that
contains
+1.
Thanks and Regards
Amit Sharma
HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On Friday 14 January 2011 06:34 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 10.04 into an
official release. This will be the first release of the 10.04 series (that
Hi Hans,
On Jan 15, 2011, at 3:55 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
I do not have the book here, but just checked the system and there the
perfReviewId is already a unique value, why have employeePartyId and
roleId also in he primary key?
Because the performance review is done for a
Please also help to verify that the distribution zip file
http://people.apache.org/~jacopoc/dist/ is working properly and the signatures
are ok.
Kind regards,
Jacopo
On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 10.04 into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12982030#action_12982030
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-4092:
Thanks Ryan!
I will work on finalizing the theme
+1.
--
Ashish
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 10.04 into an
official release. This will be the first release of the 10.04 series (that
contains the features up to 2010-04).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12982035#action_12982035
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-4092:
Ryan,
Just curious - the subdued colors and app
50 matches
Mail list logo
