The Buildbot has detected a restored build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1607
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1085
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1606
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1085599
It would be nice if we had a test for this.
-Adrian
On 3/23/2011 1:44 PM, er...@apache.org wrote:
Author: erwan
Date: Wed Mar 23 20:44:17 2011
New Revision: 1084732
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1084732&view=rev
Log:
OFBIZ-4220 a patch from Philippe Mouawad: Current implementation of U
Le 25/03/2011 08:43, hans...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: hansbak
Date: Fri Mar 25 07:43:18 2011
New Revision: 1085269
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1085269&view=rev
Log:
update of the category tree in the catalog, which now also works for large
trees. IE and blankscreen problems solved
Hi Ean, Jacopo:
Please forgive if this is obvious, but I don't understand why this is a
desired behavior. Under what circumstances would you need to represent
the inventoryItemId (as serialized inventory) in the shopping cart?
From my reading of the data model, the inventoryItemId (for serial
Yeah, this is not supported ootb because reservations happens when the order is
created, not when the items are added to the cart.
What you described could be handled, with some small changes, creating an order
and then immediately reassigning reservations by specifying the exact inventory
item.
Le 25/03/2011 09:12, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
+1, this makes more sense
Jacques
From: "Paul Foxworthy"
If we do have two tasks, how about
OK, as many of you are in favour of adding a new task, I will work on it.
Cheers,
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
Hello Jacques,
I have reopened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4225 and attach
improved patch, now parm indexing start with 0 instead of 1.
I have tested it for editRequest functionality and its working fine.
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.
www.hotwaxmedia
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Deepak Dixit updated OFBIZ-4225:
Attachment: OFBIZ-4225_TRUNK_IMPROVE.patch
OFBIZ-4225_BRANCH_IMPROVE.patch
Here is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Deepak Dixit reopened OFBIZ-4225:
-
> Lookup target-parameter in form widget is not working.
> --
The Buildbot has detected a restored build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1596
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1085
Hi Deepak,
From your comments, I'm not sure if I should wait you or do it myself (not a
big deal)?
Jacques
Deepak Dixit wrote:
Thanks Jaques,
Both ways are fine, We can use either 0 or 1 index.
I have an idea to improve target-parameter functionality and I am working on
it, will open a t
Hi Ganath,
Not at all, I was just (hardly) thinking that it may be useful for your project. Was more meant to Erwan: would this not facilitate
your mentor role (acceptance, place to use, etc.)?
More a supposition than anything else...
Jacques
From: "Ganath Rathnayaka"
I am sorry Jacques, I
+1, this makes more sense
Jacques
From: "Paul Foxworthy"
If we do have two tasks, how about
run-tests
which would revert to the older style without cobertura and would not
depend on an Internet connection, and
run-tests-with-coverage
which would use cobertura and would have the dependency
It looks more like a slave error, there are many Builbot slaves... I think it
will resume automatically... Just wait...
Jacques
From: "Hans Bakker"
it seems that the svn checkout failed?
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 07:48 +, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of
it seems that the svn checkout failed?
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 07:48 +, build...@apache.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1595
>
> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hans Bakker closed OFBIZ-4217.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 1085275.
Thanks for the patch!
> Scaling image for every size typ
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1595
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 1085269
18 matches
Mail list logo
