Error when deleting a product image from content
Key: OFBIZ-4431
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4431
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: content
Affects
Service setInvoiceStatus improved
-
Key: OFBIZ-4432
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4432
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Christian Fischer
Attachments: se
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Fischer updated OFBIZ-4432:
-
Attachment: secas_olap.xml.patch
> Service setInvoiceStatus improved
> --
Hans,
Jacques gave some examples of where an override is currently used and
why it is needed. Could you give us another reason besides "i think an
override is an overkill" - like a reason based on a design issue or a
real-world problem?
-Adrian
On 9/19/2011 7:55 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
I as
product.groovy improved
---
Key: OFBIZ-4433
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4433
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Christian Fischer
Attachments: Product.groovy.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Fischer updated OFBIZ-4433:
-
Attachment: Product.groovy.patch
> product.groovy improved
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107709#comment-13107709
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-4433:
Why is this change needed? And why is the issue m
If i use the widget comments option i want it to be generally applied
and taken away depending on the properties setting. I do not want to
find out that somewhere it is not following the setting, then have to
dig in the code and find out that is, because somebody put an
undocumented override somewh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Fischer reopened OFBIZ-4432:
--
needs to be tested
> Service setInvoiceStatus improved
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107714#comment-13107714
]
Christian Fischer commented on OFBIZ-4433:
--
If you take the name frome the entity
Hans,
We can document the behavior in the properties file, and we have this
discussion on record to describe the behavior and the reason why it was
done that way. I believe those things will help avoid confusion in the
future.
So, can we implement the behavior I described? I believe you alre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107716#comment-13107716
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-4433:
You can localize entity fields by using the UI la
ajaxAutocompleteOptions.ftl
---
Key: OFBIZ-4434
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4434
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Christian Fischer
Attachments: ajaxAutocomple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Fischer updated OFBIZ-4434:
-
Attachment: ajaxAutocompleteOptions.ftl.patch
> ajaxAutocompleteOptions.ftl
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107722#comment-13107722
]
Christian Fischer commented on OFBIZ-4433:
--
In this Patch we get a productName fr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-4274:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: REST payloads are a Map that contains the service parameters and service
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031517#comment-13031517
]
Adrian Crum edited comment on OFBIZ-4274 at 9/19/11 10:13 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-4274:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: RestXmlRepresentation.pdf is the proposed XML representation.
)
> Impleme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031141#comment-13031141
]
Adrian Crum edited comment on OFBIZ-4274 at 9/19/11 10:15 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-4274:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: Replaced PDF file with original XML file.)
> Implement a REST Servlet
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-4274:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: Updated patch and PDF file so anyone who is interested can see the
config
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-4274:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: Updated POC config patch.
)
> Implement a REST Servlet
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-4274:
---
Attachment: (was: RestXmlRepresentation.xml)
> Implement a REST Servlet
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-4274:
---
Attachment: (was: RestExampleSchema.xsd)
> Implement a REST Servlet
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-4274:
---
Attachment: RestXmlRepresentation.xml
RestExampleSchema.xsd
> Implement a REST Servle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13105193#comment-13105193
]
Adrian Crum edited comment on OFBIZ-4274 at 9/19/11 10:19 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13102570#comment-13102570
]
Adrian Crum edited comment on OFBIZ-4274 at 9/19/11 10:19 AM:
--
Hi All.
I apologize for all the noise from Jira - I am finished with the high
level REST servlet design and I wanted to clean up the issue so it would
be easier to read.
I know everyone is busy, but if you could spare a few minutes to take a
look at the proposed REST servlet design I would r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-4433:
> product.groovy improved
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-4433
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107732#comment-13107732
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4433:
Aboutthe Resolved status: if you provide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107732#comment-13107732
]
Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-4433 at 9/19/11 10:28 AM:
--
Fixed typo in ProductionRun class.
--
Key: OFBIZ-4435
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4435
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: manufacturing
Reporter: Deepak Dixit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Deepak Dixit updated OFBIZ-4435:
Attachment: OFBIZ-4435.patch
OFBIZ-4435-Trunk.patch
OFBIZ-4435-Trunk.patch for late
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dimitri Unruh updated OFBIZ-4296:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-4296.patch
> JmsTopicListener started twice when distributed-cache-clear is act
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107748#comment-13107748
]
Paul Foxworthy commented on OFBIZ-4386:
---
Hi Jacques,
The same line was in the patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107749#comment-13107749
]
Dimitri Unruh commented on OFBIZ-4296:
--
Jacques,
thank you for your comment.
I provi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107750#comment-13107750
]
Raj Saini commented on OFBIZ-4274:
--
I am not the expert but one of my quick observation i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107755#comment-13107755
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-4274:
Raj,
I apologize if the design description was n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107758#comment-13107758
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4386:
Paul, it's already done in the last patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Foxworthy updated OFBIZ-4386:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-4386_IssuanceServices.patch
> Order not completed when filled from more than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107762#comment-13107762
]
Paul Foxworthy commented on OFBIZ-4386:
---
Hi Jacques, I've uploaded one more. Refresh
I did not look into details yet, but why SalesOpportunityWorkEffort exists if
we don't use it?
Also I agree with Scott on
The business case could be redescribed as:
- Email Received (CommunicationEvent)
- WorkEffort created to handle the communication
- Communication deemed to be a sales opportu
Unfortunately, I believe Hans's answer was
I think how it is implemented now is fine. I hope i commented now
enough?
In other words, he don't want to cvhange the way it's done at the moment. Did yo consider "my proposition" Adrian, Hans? I think
it's a good compromise...
Jacques
From: "Adr
Perhaps your reply was meant for another thread?
-Adrian
On 9/19/2011 1:10 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Unfortunately, I believe Hans's answer was
I think how it is implemented now is fine. I hope i commented now
enough?
In other words, he don't want to cvhange the way it's done at the
momen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Foxworthy updated OFBIZ-4427:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-4427.patch
I tried commenting out isEmpty( Object ) and isNotEmpty(Object), a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107806#comment-13107806
]
Paul Foxworthy commented on OFBIZ-4427:
---
https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/~br=t
Oops, indeed :/
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum"
Perhaps your reply was meant for another thread?
-Adrian
On 9/19/2011 1:10 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Unfortunately, I believe Hans's answer was
I think how it is implemented now is fine. I hope i commented now
enough?
In other words, he don't
Unfortunately, I believe Hans's answer was
I think how it is implemented now is fine. I hope i commented now
enough?
In other words, he does not want to change the way it's done at the moment. Did yoy consider "my proposition" (based on Scott's)
Adrian, Hans? I think it's a good compromise...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107812#comment-13107812
]
Raj Saini commented on OFBIZ-4274:
--
Adrian,
Thanks for the clarification.
There are RES
Jacques:
what i wrote?
> as long as the properties setting in the trunk will show or hide all
> widget comments (so in the trunk NO override) then it is fine.
Regards,
Hans
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 15:24 +0200, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Unfortunately, I believe Hans's answer was
>
> > I think how
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107903#comment-13107903
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-4274:
Raj,
I understand what you are saying, but the O
+1
KISS
one place to turn off and on. common sense says you use for development
then you turn it off so there are no comments in the ouput.
So there is not need to have the comments turned off at component level.
Hans Bakker sent the following on 9/19/2011 2:14 AM:
> If i use the widget comments
BJ,
The original message of this thread points out why that approach does
not work. If comments are defaulted to on, then there MUST be a way to
turn them off for things like CSV output.
-Adrian
On 9/19/2011 4:39 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
+1
KISS
one place to turn off and on. common sense says
actually I was suggesting that ofbiz as a whole would be re-factored to NIO
My underlying motivation is to stop expanding libraries and start only
having what ofbiz is really using.
and that is a harder effort but well worth it.
But I am willing to work with the jira.
Jacques Le Roux sent the foll
yes I understand. but a simple turn off all comments lets you work with
that. but if you want to see what is generating that, then turn them all on.
Like Hans said, I really don't want to have to go through code to find
where it is turned off or on.
Adrian Crum sent the following on 9/19/2011 8:56
And there are others who don't like the all-or-nothing approach. Please,
unless you have something new to add, can we stop talking in circles?
-Adrian
On 9/19/2011 5:02 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
yes I understand. but a simple turn off all comments lets you work with
that. but if you want to see wh
Then I suggest a vote, though mine is none binding.
Adrian Crum sent the following on 9/19/2011 9:06 AM:
> And there are others who don't like the all-or-nothing approach. Please,
> unless you have something new to add, can we stop talking in circles?
>
> -Adrian
>
> On 9/19/2011 5:02 PM, BJ Fre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107984#comment-13107984
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-4430:
---
My suggestion to use NIO was more for all of Ofbiz.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13108006#comment-13108006
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-4430:
---
Quick review there are two possible solutions with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kiran Gawde updated OFBIZ-4410:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-4410-breadcrumbsEfficientCode.patch
Updated the patch to work with trunk
> breadcr
If the main problem is not wanting to go through all the code to find
where the comments are on/off, perhaps a solution would be log
messages at startup saying which comments are turned on where? Then
when anyone sees/doesn't see comments they do/don't want, they can
look at the startup logs to see
Anne,
Logging the settings is not necessary because the design is not that
complicated. A setting in the widget.properties file is the default.
That setting can be overridden in web.xml, and the setting in web.xml
can be overridden in an individual screen widget by setting a value in
the rend
Thanks Adrian. I was just trying to work out a way everyone would get
what they really wanted.
Your precedence makes sense to me, and I'm not sure I understand
others' concerns. But that doesn't mean I think they are unimportant,
just that I haven't managed to understand yet.
I was thinking their
Anne,
Your suggestions are appreciated.
We're already making a mountain out of a molehill with this issue, and
logging the setting would just add to the mountain.
-Adrian
On 9/20/2011 1:29 AM, Anne wrote:
Thanks Adrian. I was just trying to work out a way everyone would get
what they really
Thank you everyone for your patience and comments during this
discussion. I believe we are near a resolution.
From my perspective, this is where we stand:
1. I proposed the following design based on David's suggestion:
If the widget.verbose setting in the properties file is false, then it
ove
Ok Adrian, at least for the third time: (five times in a different
wording)
what i wrote?
> as long as the properties setting in the trunk will show or hide all
> widget comments (so in the trunk NO override) then it is fine.
Regards,
Hans
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 02:10 +0100, Adrian Crum wrote:
Thank you Hans, but repeating your confusing replies does not make them
any clearer.
I need a simple yes or no answer: May we implement the design I proposed?
-Adrian
On 9/20/2011 2:17 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Ok Adrian, at least for the third time: (five times in a different
wording)
what i w
Sorry my English Adrian, as usual, every change in the system you make
as difficult as possible, technically you are very good and from that
point of view happy to have you in the community, but communication and
consideration of end users, no one is perfectso sure (that means
YES) you can go a
Thank you Hans.
I will work on the proposed design and get it committed. If there are
any issues with the commit, I hope we can discuss them here and not
engage in a commit war.
-Adrian
On 9/20/2011 2:31 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Sorry my English Adrian, as usual, every change in the system y
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13108329#comment-13108329
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-4430:
---
in current httpClient.sendHttpRequest()
Hi Scott,
We looked into your comment, but found that inventoryitem owner is not
always affecting accounting:
1. service product: foreign owner: no account update
2. rental product: is owner: also no accounting update
we are following however your remark to generalize:
for both product types we
Hi Adrian,
we looked into this and still decided to have a component entity which
is loaded with the run-install command and can be connected with a
tenant of which the seed/demo data is loaded. Because the tenants are
already in a entity it would be easier to have the components there too.
we us
72 matches
Mail list logo
