Le 05/02/2015 08:02, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
I think that they are showing search results as the user types and the ERP does
not care what field you are entering.
If you start typing in the postal code field it will display everyone whose
postal code matches what you have typed so far.
When you
I would though wait that all the possibly related opened Jiras will be fixed. Some projects are based on the R14.12 branch and people expect this
branch to be stable even if not yet released.
Jacques
Le 04/02/2015 06:34, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Jan 17, 2015, at 11:16 PM, Adrian Crum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14306824#comment-14306824
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5929:
Quoting tofumiyo...@outlook.com on dev ML
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-6060:
---
I reverted in R14.12 at r1657749
We can no longer reset services definitions by clearing caches
On 05/02/2015 9:49 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
All of this is already stated on the OFBiz web site, so I don't
understand the point of this reply.
Reference?
My plans are no different than many other branch backports that have
been done in the past.
Jacques seemed to find that not to be true.
I
Exactly. I would like to wait a few months to make sure all issues have
surfaced and have been fixed.
Btw, I apologize for all of the recent bugs resulting from the refactor.
I had done some work on it on one weekend, and then set it aside. When I
returned to it the next weekend, I thought it
Jacques Le Roux created OFBIZ-6060:
--
Summary: We can no longer reset services definitions by clearing
caches
Key: OFBIZ-6060
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6060
Project: OFBiz
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6060 for that
While at it I found this discussion:
http://markmail.org/message/e63blvefzkxvvjrn
I though noticed that nowadays clearing all caches manually does not take much time on an up to date machine. So clearing only services caches
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-6060:
---
Description:
Rupert Howell told me that between the middle of 2014 and the end of October we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum reassigned OFBIZ-6060:
--
Assignee: Adrian Crum
We can no longer reset services definitions by clearing caches
Thanks for report,
I put your message as a comment in the Jira
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5929?focusedCommentId=14306824
Please do so yourself next time (answer in Jira rather than directly to the
ML), thanks!
Jacques
Le 27/01/2015 05:20, 杜 文吉 a écrit :
also find that
All of this is already stated on the OFBiz web site, so I don't
understand the point of this reply.
My plans are no different than many other branch backports that have
been done in the past.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 2/5/2015 6:41 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Wheeler updated OFBIZ-6059:
---
Summary: UOM missing 2 entries (was: RB UOM missing 2 entries)
UOM missing 2 entries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Wheeler updated OFBIZ-6059:
---
Description:
Uom abbreviation=Pb description=Petabyte of Data uomId=DATA_Pb
uomTypeId=DATA_MEASURE/
Ron Wheeler created OFBIZ-6059:
--
Summary: RB UOM missing 2 entries
Key: OFBIZ-6059
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6059
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Releases are stable.
Things that are not released are mutable.
The use of unconventional conventions should be stopped as soon as possible.
If a branch has reached a state where no more changes except bug fixes
are expected then prioritize and clean up the JIRA issues that are
sufficiently
Too far past my pay-grade!
This is more for the people working on the long-term development plans
and the marketing position of OFBiz.
Not every competitor has all of the ideas incorporated into their products.
Not every idea is going have an ROI that the OFBiz community will find
compelling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14308072#comment-14308072
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6060:
Yes, just revert it and you will see.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14308063#comment-14308063
]
Adrian Crum edited comment on OFBIZ-6060 at 2/5/15 9:53 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum closed OFBIZ-6060.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 14.12.01)
Fixed in rev 1657714. Thanks!
We can no
Le 05/02/2015 15:49, Adrian Crum a écrit :
All of this is already stated on the OFBiz web site, so I don't understand the
point of this reply.
My plans are no different than many other branch backports that have been done
in the past.
If memory serves, other branches backports have always
21 matches
Mail list logo
