Re: Facility on OrderHeader

Hi Suraj, Is there still a ship group for intangibles like services or digital downloads? Thanks Paul Foxworthy On 1 December 2017 at 19:37, Suraj Khurana wrote: > Hello, > > We can associate facility at ship group level, every SO or PO contains at > least

Re: Change default Theme to Rainbow Saphir

Thanks! - Original Message -From: Jacques Le Roux To: dev@ofbiz.apache.orgSent: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:10:28 - (UTC)Subject: Re: Change default Theme to Rainbow Saphir Hi Dan, I'll not remove it but it will no longer be the default theme, WIP:

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

This is done, the default theme in trunk is now Rainbow Saphir, see OFBIZ-9990/9924 Jacques Le 01/12/2017 à 11:08, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi James, Le 30/11/2017 à 16:30, James Yong a écrit : +1 to using Flat Grey theme as the default for the upcoming release for the reason given by

Re: Change default Theme to Rainbow Saphir

This is done, the default theme in trunk is now Rainbow Saphir, see OFBIZ-9990 I have also updated https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Visual+Themes+Gallery BTW it would be great if we could use the same logo everywhere and get rid of old version at least in svn trunk It's a

Re: Change default Theme to Rainbow Saphir

Hi Dan, I'll not remove it but it will no longer be the default theme, WIP: http://markmail.org/message/yaerkxdecxv3lrdl Jacques Le 02/11/2017 à 19:30, stim...@comcast.net a écrit : This bug under Tomahawk theme was never addressed. I'd suggest removing Tomahawk as long as a default theme

Re: Planning for the creation of the new 17.xx branch(es)

Hi James, Le 30/11/2017 à 16:30, James Yong a écrit : +1 to using Flat Grey theme as the default for the upcoming release for the reason given by Jacques Was trying out on Visual Theme selection. Saw some rough edges on the OFBiz logo for Tomahawk & Flat Grey themes. Actual OFBiz logo seen in

Re: Permission overrides auth parameter of service

Thanks everyone for your inputs. Yes, there are similar occurrences where permission service is defined and service is used in case of an anonymous user as well. Example: *CreateShoppingList* and related services I was presuming we can execute any service as permission service irrespective of

Facility on OrderHeader

Hello, We can associate facility at ship group level, every SO or PO contains at least one ship group as well. Is there any other case for which we need to maintain the facility at OrderHeader level? If not, I propose we should remove it from OrderHeader level and always maintain it at ship group